To: bnelson44
Who would have thought 200 years ago that we'd even be arguing this? Insane.
5 posted on
07/19/2006 2:10:45 PM PDT by
jdm
To: jdm
Who would have thought 200 years ago that we'd even be arguing this? Insane. Or the 2nd and 4th amendments, abortion, gay marriage, income tax, and a miriade of other crap that would make our forefathers puke.
13 posted on
07/19/2006 2:22:39 PM PDT by
unixfox
(The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
To: jdm
Who would have thought 200 years ago that we'd even be arguing this? Insane. No kidding. Since the Warren court, judges have wrapped politically based decisions in various penumbras and emanations of made up and lately, international or even Nigerian law. Then they get angry when we criticize them as we would any other pol.
25 posted on
07/19/2006 3:51:16 PM PDT by
Jacquerie
(How few were left who had seen the republic! Tacitus)
To: jdm
200 years ago there was no pledge. 53 years ago there was no "under God" phrase in the pledge.
You probably couldn't have imagined such things would be argued so far in the future from 200 years ago.
How the pledge used to be performed...
33 posted on
07/19/2006 4:46:16 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
(Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace higher taxes, gay weddings with Angelides.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson