To: Jacquerie; burzum
You know, I would say this:
Congress has the right to protect the free exercise of Religion.
I fall back on the Constitution:
1st Amendment:
Congress shall pass no law to establish a religion, or limit the free exercise thereof
Congress can not pass a law that tells you and me which church or religion to believe in; and Congress can not limit the free exercise of Religion (unless the religion tells you to harm another). Meaning, if Congress said you can not say God then they would be passing a law that limits the free exercise of religion. Saying God or putting religious symbols on Public property does not establish a religion. It takes a law from Congress to do that. But Congress should never pass a law that stops people from expressing themselves. That to me would seem unconstitutional.
36 posted on
07/19/2006 5:12:50 PM PDT by
do the dhue
(I hope y'all will help bail me out of jail after I dot Hack Murtha's eyes.)
To: do the dhue
Meaning, if Congress said you can not say God then they would be passing a law that limits the free exercise of religion.
How about a law that mandates all schoolchildren recite this socialist loyalty oath that mentions God?
39 posted on
07/19/2006 5:40:21 PM PDT by
Quick1
(There is no Theory of Evolution. Just a list of animals Chuck Norris allows to live.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson