Skip to comments.
New York Times chops 250 jobs (Stock at 7yr low)
The Gazette (Canada.com) ^
| 07/19/2006
| Staff Report
Posted on 07/19/2006 8:05:16 AM PDT by Moose Dung
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: stephenjohnbanker
1. Why would anyone spend $5 on their Sunday people?
2. Why would anyone actually want to read tabloid trash every day for several years? I'm hoping people use the Times for their kitty litter like I do for my local leftist newspaper.
Going in the opposite direction would be the only way to save it...:)
To: Moose Dung
The reduction in the size of its pages would mean a loss of 11 per cent of the space devoted to news propaganda, but the newspaper plans to add pages to make up for about half of that loss [by hitting up socialists & communists to do more false advertising].
22
posted on
07/19/2006 8:21:48 AM PDT
by
demkicker
(democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
To: stephenjohnbanker
Is there not ONE Conservative with enough dough to form a hostile takeover of this Red Rag? You'd have to fire everybody in the news room and deal with the unions who produce the paper. No way. Might as well build something from the ground up.
23
posted on
07/19/2006 8:22:10 AM PDT
by
D-Chivas
To: stephenjohnbanker
Is there not ONE Conservative with enough dough to form a hostile takeover of this Red Rag?...
Don't know the answer to your question, but in NYC there is an excellent full size newspaper that is far more even handed and much better written than the Times. Freepers who can should sign up for the New York Sun. I drive two miles from my Long Island home to go to the only convenience store that sells it. Maybe if L.I, Westchester, and NJ Freepers went to their local convenience stores and asked for the Sun we could increase the circulation and create a successful and "literate" challenge to the Times.
24
posted on
07/19/2006 8:22:49 AM PDT
by
xkaydet65
(Peace, Love, Brotherhood, and Firepower. And the greatest of these is Firepower!)
To: Moose Dung; abb; Milhous; martin_fierro; Liz; george76
Below is the 2 year chart comparing NYT/Ny slimes with MDY, Mid Cap ETF Index fund, and the evil Haliburton. Any fund manager who has been buying NYT the past two years should be turned into the SEC for mal practice.
25
posted on
07/19/2006 8:23:12 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
To: stephenjohnbanker
They don't have a high enough debt/equity ratio. I bet it they let it get up to "2" then someone with some balls and some loot could go out of their way to do it. But its only at .92 so it would not be profitable and probably not possible.
26
posted on
07/19/2006 8:23:35 AM PDT
by
xpertskir
(I hate hippies but love hippie music)
To: Moose Dung
Can't imagine why the New York times would have to lay anyone off /sarc
27
posted on
07/19/2006 8:23:51 AM PDT
by
McCloud-Strife
(John McCain: great American, poor Senator, Horrible Republican: Never forget, never forgive betrayal)
To: D-Chivas
Is the printing plant in question (Edison NJ) visible from the NJ Turnpike? I always see a blue building, on the east side of the turnpike (that is, the right side if one is going north). It's near the New Brunswick exit IIRC.
28
posted on
07/19/2006 8:24:23 AM PDT
by
rudy45
To: EagleUSA
"I would buy stock in it!!!"
Millions of us would.
29
posted on
07/19/2006 8:24:28 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
To: PajamaTruthMafia
30
posted on
07/19/2006 8:25:17 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
To: Moose Dung
This is what you get when the
New York Times never learned from the fiasco of the Jayson Blair scandal.
To: EagleUSA
Not yet. Their last quarter was essentially flat, or marginally higher on the prior year, and so was their ad revenue.
32
posted on
07/19/2006 8:26:46 AM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Moose Dung
To: D-Chivas
"You'd have to fire everybody in the news room and deal with the unions who produce the paper."
Most liberals are cowards, and the unions are getting weaker by the minute.
34
posted on
07/19/2006 8:27:43 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
To: Grampa Dave
In other coverage, here's what the Times management is saying about their change in the size of the printed edition:
"The company plans to finish the changes by the second quarter of 2008, and sees annual savings of about $42 million. Capital spending on the changes will be about $150 million."
So their gonna spend $150MM to save $42MM????
Bwahahaha!!
dung.
35
posted on
07/19/2006 8:28:35 AM PDT
by
Moose Dung
(Perquacky is a fools game.)
To: Grampa Dave
36
posted on
07/19/2006 8:28:49 AM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: xpertskir
You are probably right on all counts.
37
posted on
07/19/2006 8:30:38 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
To: Moose Dung
So their gonna spend $150MM to save $42MM???? They're just investing in the future! (sarc.)
38
posted on
07/19/2006 8:30:55 AM PDT
by
Socratic
("I'll have the roast duck with the mango salsa.")
To: Moose Dung
More good news.Pinch is running the NYTimes into the ground.Just not fast enough(IMO).
39
posted on
07/19/2006 8:33:56 AM PDT
by
Thombo2
To: 2banana
The NY Post and NY Times are aimed at very different markets. The Post may be "more balanced," but it is basically a trashy tabloid. Its main competitors are the New York Daily News and New York/Long Island Newsday.
40
posted on
07/19/2006 8:35:19 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson