[stands2reason]

He's not talking about the Bible, he's talking about Biblical texts.

Those are two totally different things.

(/sarcasm)

[Fester Chugabrew]

The two are not totally different. The "bible" is typically considered a specific collection of sacred writings with a more strict delineation of content than what I refer to as the biblical texts. Be that as it may, it is a consistent attribute of those who reject the biblical texts to engage in mysticism, superstition, philosophies, and false science.

Science works better when one knows where he came from and where he is going. Darwinists don't have that advantage. As such they have served as an albatross around the neck of science for the past 150 years with the exception of their keen ability to record certain specific facts in great detail.

[SaveUS]

"He's not talking about the Bible, he's talking about Biblical texts.
Those are two totally different things.
(/sarcasm)"

I see some of the craziest things in these threads. I wonder if these arguments work on any of the people they try them on? Tomzz blaming the deaths of 10's of millions of people on evolutionists is the exact reason this crap needs to stay out of public schools and buried in some private Ernest Ansley Academy.