Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darwin's Beagle ship replica plan [for his 200th birthday]
BBC News ^ | 19 July 2006 | Staff

Posted on 07/19/2006 3:55:15 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

Plans are being drawn up to build a £3.3m working replica of the boat that took Charles Darwin around the world at Milford Haven in Pembrokeshire.

Fundraising for the project, which would mark the 200th anniversary of Darwin's birth in 2009, is under way.

The aim is to built a seaworthy vessel identical to the HMS Beagle on the outside, but with a modern interior.

Darwin, who showed how natural selection could explain evolution, sailed on the Beagle between 1831-36.

Sitting opposite him on the expedition was mate and surveyor John Lort Stokes.

One of Stokes' descendents, Pembrokeshire farmer David Lort Philips, together with commercial yacht master Peter McGrath, have founded the Beagle Project Pembrokeshire.

Mr McGrath said the ship would look identical to the original Beagle on the outside but would have a 21st century interior with diesel auxiliary engines and generators.


Charles Darwin developed his early theories on board the Beagle

He said he hoped the fished vessel would inspire the scientists of the future and be used by researchers and scientists from across the world.

"Externally it will be exactly the same but we want it to do some serious scientific work and you would not want the crew living like they did in the 18th Century," he said.

The pair have spent three years putting their plans together and aim to raise the money through private and institutional investors along with public subscription.

"With all the Darwin 200 celebrations there is not one big project to focus the attention on," added Mr McGrath.

"I know the effect a square rigger has on young people - it's a jaw dropping site.

"But we do not want this just to be a replica - we want it to have genuine scientific benefits.

"We have started the fundraising. Construction will take 14 months and it has to be finished by early 2009.

"She will be built in Milford Haven and it will be her home. But what we want to do when she is built is visit the significant sights in Darwin's and the Beagle's life."

Researchers believe the original remains of the 27m-long Navy brig, that was sold for scrap in 1870, are embedded in a marsh near Potton Island in Essex.

Darwin, who published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection in 1859, came fourth in a poll run by the BBC in 2002 to find the public's greatest Briton of all time.

His voyage on the Beagle allowed him to form the basis for much of his later work.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bilgebarge; birthofanotion; canardline; crevolist; fetish; garbagescow; godless; idolworship; notthissh1tagain; obsession; onetrickpony; pavlovian; poorwiddleluddites; shipoffools; spoof; voyageofthedamned; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 461-464 next last
To: Thatcherite

Since you claim to be the real Patrick Henry, did you start this thread? Hard to beleive it got this much play. I have been getting pulled back into it all day.


221 posted on 07/19/2006 3:58:35 PM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
Science is not "all wrong." I know you meant it sarcastically, and I trust you know better than to suggest the biblical texts are ipso facto anti-science. They enjoin the reader to fill the earth and subdue it, not indulge a mysticism that discards intelligent design in cases where organized matter performs specific functions.

More to the point: Certain major features of the planet were formed at the time the planet itself was formed. The geologic record attests more prominently to catastrophism than to uniformitarianism. This would take place on a larger scale during the early stages of the earth's formation than it would have during the global deluge which you dismiss out of hand for personal reasons.

And then there's that pesky problem of time, which science has yet to define. I prefer to start with the assumption the biblical texts are accurate and authoritative. The global deluge mentioned therein is not at all difficult to recognize on the basis of the geologic record. You pretend to make no assumptions, yet your claims make fairly clear what those assumptions are. You've chosen your own biblical texts: ones that emanate from yourself and those who think like you. If I were in your shoes I'd make the same conclusions you do, and I could defend them.

222 posted on 07/19/2006 4:08:44 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

"Darwin is linked with Hitler's actions."

You have failed to demonstrate any link beyond your claim they both doubted the authority of the Bible (which itself hasn't been shown for Hitler). Most people in the world do not accept the authority of the Bible. They are not like Hitler.

"Evolutionism, insofar as it attempts to deny intelligent design, is superstitious enough without Hitler's endorsement."

You are drowning in your logical fallacies Fester, and I think you like it.

BTW, evolutionary theory doesn't deny the possibility of an intelligent designer.


223 posted on 07/19/2006 4:17:12 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite
Numerous people who believe in the divinity of Christ also accept the physical evidence that underpins evolution.

The biblical texts indicate that even demons believe in the divinity of Christ. They even acknowlege the authority of the biblical texts. I'm sure they are happy to see the physical evidence that underpins evolution used as a means to draw people away from their Creator, too.

Anyway, great to see the Beagle resurrected from the dead. Evolutionists need a holy shrine. Maybe this one will work better than public schools. Cool!

224 posted on 07/19/2006 4:18:01 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
. . . drowning in your logical fallacies . . .

Pronouncements such as this are moot when coming from one who cannot distinguish the difference between "the bible" and "biblical texts;" who thinks it is a logical fallacy to note the similarity between Hitler and the Dali Lama insofar as both exalt ther own reason over the biblical texts; who cannot see the difference between what the biblical texts say and what Adolph Hitler did under the pretext of accepting their authority.

Be that as it may, you have reason to celebrate. A shrine is about to be erected in honor of one of your favorite philosphers of history.

225 posted on 07/19/2006 4:30:14 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

"I prefer to start with the assumption the biblical texts are accurate and authoritative."

Ahh, so that is where you screwed up. Go back and start over and skip that assumption. Let us know how you progress.


226 posted on 07/19/2006 4:38:46 PM PDT by SaveUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: SaveUS

If I did that I'd be a mystic like you, calling intelligent design an "unscientific" idea. No thanks. I tend to shy away from wild speculations both in science and theology.


227 posted on 07/19/2006 4:45:04 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

"Not to mention the fact that no part of the biblical texts invites dismissal on the face of it."

A few things that invite immediate dismissal:
1. All the universe and everything in it created in 6 days.
2. God stops time to let one army kill the other.
3. Somebody rides a fiery chariot to heaven.
4. God turns Lot's wife into a salt shaker for looking back, but has no problem with Lot nailing his daughters after offering them up to S&G, and using the excuse that he was too drunk to know what what happening.
5. The global flood.
6. Putting two of every animal on earth into a homemade boat.
7. Anything in the book of Revelations.

Ok, more than a few, but you get the idea.


228 posted on 07/19/2006 4:52:38 PM PDT by SaveUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

Intelligent design is religion. There is no science to it.


229 posted on 07/19/2006 4:53:57 PM PDT by SaveUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: SaveUS

Nah. Most of those are minor physical anomalies. Nothing superstitious, mystical, unreasonable, or unscientific about them. Or maybe your car thinks it's a mystical experience when you intervene to change the oil?


230 posted on 07/19/2006 5:04:58 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: SaveUS

Coming from a superstitious mystic I can understand your opinion. The rest of us are happy to give credit where credit is due, either generally or specifically.


231 posted on 07/19/2006 5:07:05 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
who thinks it is a logical fallacy to note the similarity between Hitler and the Dali Lama insofar as both exalt ther own reason over the biblical texts

False dichotomy fallacy.
232 posted on 07/19/2006 5:22:27 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
"On the contrary, they address the very same physical realities science is bound to examine."

The difference is not in what they examine but how they examine and what can be claimed as a cause.

233 posted on 07/19/2006 5:22:42 PM PDT by b_sharp (Why bother with a tagline? Even they eventually wear out! (Second Law of Taglines))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp

Regardless, it is not true that the biblical texts "have nothing to do with science." They happen to deal with the what, the how, and the why of physical reality. All of these questions are investigated by science.


234 posted on 07/19/2006 5:31:39 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
No. The false dichotomy resides with those who divorce the biblical texts from science, and who erect a barrier between the physical and metaphysical as if this somehow is more "scientific."
235 posted on 07/19/2006 5:34:03 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
No.

You assume that an individual either derives claims regarding the workings of the universe from "biblical texts" or "their own reason". In so doing you omit the possibility of an individual deriving such claims from a religious text other than the "biblical texts". As such, you have created a false dichotomy.

The false dichotomy resides with those who divorce the biblical texts from science,

Why should the biblical texts -- and no other religious texts -- be "married" to science?
236 posted on 07/19/2006 5:35:55 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Peanut Gallery

PING


237 posted on 07/19/2006 5:39:37 PM PDT by Professional Engineer (Hurrah for the flag of the free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomzz
"The first ten or twelve paragraphs of the section on races and nations in Mein Kampf sound so much like Darwin's works that it's hard to tell the difference."

Are you of the misbegotten opinion that if you can show Hitler believed in the Theory of Evolution, the observed phenomenon of Evolution and the observed mechanisms of mutation and selection/drift will just go away? The moment you prove Hitler was an 'evolutionist' all Evolution will halt?

Or perhaps you believe proving Hitler an 'evolutionist' will cause the rest of the world's Evolution proponents to suddenly become maniacal killing machines?

What Hitler believed was secondary to what he wanted. His irrational hate would have manifested even if Darwin's ideas had not been published. Look to the man, not the tools.

238 posted on 07/19/2006 5:44:07 PM PDT by b_sharp (Why bother with a tagline? Even they eventually wear out! (Second Law of Taglines))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
Huh?! Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot were all devout Darwinists.

I'm sure you can provide us with some real evidence to back up this outrageous lie?

239 posted on 07/19/2006 5:44:22 PM PDT by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

They don't have a congress in Britain, they have a parliament.


240 posted on 07/19/2006 5:50:14 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 461-464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson