Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats fault abortion risk info
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | July 17, 2006 | KEVIN FREKING

Posted on 07/18/2006 1:35:59 AM PDT by neverdem

ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON -- Women who consult with pregnancy resource centers often get misleading information about the health risks associated with having an abortion, according to a report issued Monday by Democrats on the House Government Reform Committee.

Congressional aides, posing as pregnant 17-year-olds, called 25 pregnancy centers that have received some federal funding over the past five years.

The aides were routinely told of increased risk for cancer, infertility and stress disorders, said the report, which was prepared for Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.

Only a small fraction of the more than 4,000 pregnancy clinics nationwide get any federal funding, mostly for promoting sexual abstinence.

With a few exceptions, the federal government doesn't give money specifically for the counseling operations, but Waxman's staff said 25 centers got "capacity building grants." Thus, Waxman said, they should be held accountable for the information they dispense.

Of the 25 centers called, two could not be reached. Eight told the caller that abortion leads to a greater risk of breast cancer, the report said.

Care Net, an umbrella group for evangelical pregnancy centers across the country, instructs its affiliates to tell callers there is a possibility that abortion can lead to greater risk of breast cancer, according to Molly Ford, an official with the organization. She said there have been several studies that say it does, and several that say it doesn't.

"I know the report is wanting to say that it's conclusive, but it isn't," Ford said.

None of the pregnancy centers the committee staff called was identified, and it could not be determined if any were linked to Care Net, which has helped about a quarter of the nation's pregnancy centers begin operations.

One pregnancy center told a congressional aide the risk of cancer after an abortion could be 80 percent higher, the report noted. Ford said she doubted a pregnancy center would go that far, but the Web site for a pregnancy center in Albuquerque says the risk for cancer after an abortion is 50 percent or greater.

In February 2003, a National Cancer Institute workshop concluded that having an abortion or miscarriage does not increase a woman's subsequent risk of developing breast cancer.

The report from the Democratic aides also said the pregnancy resource centers provided false information about the mental health effects of abortion, telling the aides that it could cause severe long-term emotional harm.

However, an American Psychological Association panel said, "Severe negative reactions are rare."

But Ford said that pregnancy center counselors don't need statistics to tell them that many women undergoing an abortion experience severe emotional trauma.

"This isn't about a medical statistic to us. We do post-abortion counseling every day," Ford said.

The Administration for Children and Families within the Department of Health and Human Services funds the abstinence programs overseen by some of the pregnancy centers. Aides referred questions about the report to Wade Horn, a Health and Human Services assistant secretary, who did not want to comment until he read the report.

Waxman said that Americans are divided on the issue of abortion, but no one should support misleading teenagers about basic medical facts.

" It's wrong to pour millions of federal dollars into organizations that are providing false health information to vulnerable teenagers," Waxman said.

On the Net:

Committee on Government Reform report, minority staff: http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/

Care Net: http://www.care-net.org/


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: New York
KEYWORDS: abortion; breastcancer; democrats
According to New York State's follow up study and report about the increased incidence and prevalence of breast cancer on Long Island: "The importance of reproductive factors in affecting breast cancer risk has been known for a long time. Women who have never given birth (or had a full-term pregnancy) are at a higher risk for breast cancer compared to women who have carried a pregnancy to term.(Page 26)"

CORAM, MT. SINAI, PORT JEFFERSON STATION (CMP) FOLLOW-UP INVESTIGATION pdf format

1 posted on 07/18/2006 1:36:04 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

But Herr Waxman and his ilk have no problem screaming at us with absolute certitude that global warming is destroying the planet and secondhand smoke is killing thousands.


2 posted on 07/18/2006 2:29:47 AM PDT by Dahoser (Time to condense the stupid party nonsense: Terry Tate for RNC chairman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser; neverdem

I look forward to seeing their report on what Planned Parenthood clinics tell their customers, but I'm not holding my breath waiting for it.


3 posted on 07/18/2006 2:39:00 AM PDT by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The Democrats have never let the facts get in the way of their support for abortion. Henry Waxman thinks women shouldn't be told the other side of the story and they need to be protected from themselves. Now THAT's sexist.

(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em, Down Hezbullies.)

4 posted on 07/18/2006 2:39:24 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Congressional aides, posing as pregnant 17-year-olds, called 25 pregnancy centers that have received some federal funding over the past five years.

Who authorized this expense on the part of the taxpayers? Is this a legitimate "investigation"? If so few crisis pregnancy centers receive Federal funds, and those centers called were not identified, how do we know exactly what is going on here?

5 posted on 07/18/2006 3:19:41 AM PDT by MSSC6644
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
What's the deal with the bloody Dems?

Have they got shares in Planned Parenthood? Maybe they're just blood thirsty...
6 posted on 07/18/2006 3:29:21 AM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Henry Waxman is a monster in mind, soul and face. His only goal in life is to murder the unborn while keeping his friends in the abortion mills rolling in blood and money. An uglier goal would be diffcult to find but leave it to Wacky Waxman, he loves the smell of death and money.


7 posted on 07/18/2006 3:33:01 AM PDT by Rockiette (Democrats are not intelligent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

You would think they think this is true!

8 posted on 07/18/2006 3:50:22 AM PDT by bondjamesbond (Rice 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek

You can start here.
http://www.childpredators.com/Tapes.cfm


9 posted on 07/18/2006 4:16:38 AM PDT by AliVeritas ("One for all , all for kicking *ss and taking names" ...Scratch taking names. Vlad fatwa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
What is this guy complaining about? That these counseling centers may be driving away some of the abortion business? I thought abortions were supposed to be safe, legal, and rare.
10 posted on 07/18/2006 4:47:41 AM PDT by sportutegrl (A person is a person, no matter how small. (Dr. Seuss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Isn't that what going on the pill is supposed to do to young girls also? It's the same kind of thing. Not having a full term pregnancy for the first one. I'm astounded about hte number of teens that are on the pill, often for medical reasons.


11 posted on 07/18/2006 5:03:47 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser

Waxman needs to abort that nose. Good Lord!


12 posted on 07/18/2006 5:17:57 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser; Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek; neverdem
Herr Waxman

That is uncalled for.

On topic - and although I have no readily available statistics, my guess is that a survey would show that most women regret having an abortion.

If a woman can be scared out of having an abortion for the reasons stated above than she probably didn't have her mind set on it anyway and that means she likely have 'less convenient' but nevertheless conceivable alternatives. In other words the abortion is a lifestyle choice of convenience, not an issue of survival (at least in her mind)

Before abortion was legal, some women (although very few) literally and knowingly risked their lives to have abortions. My guess is that these women were so desperate that for them the choice was essentially an issue of survival.

If abortion were made illegal, there would still be women like latter, but then none like the former.

The logic would dictate that anything that is within the realm of truth that might persuade a woman to not have an abortion should be undertaken.

Ultimately my opinion makes me pro-choice; but in the most limited circumstances possible and with the greatest amount of prevention and intervention possible.

13 posted on 07/18/2006 6:45:12 AM PDT by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit ("my concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God's side" - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The report from the Democratic aides also said the pregnancy resource centers provided false information about the mental health effects of abortion, telling the aides that it could cause severe long-term emotional harm.

However, an American Psychological Association panel said, "Severe negative reactions are rare."

In what way would the information mentioned in the first paragraph be false given the second paragraph.

14 posted on 07/18/2006 8:05:35 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Leftists are attracted to death and harm. Like iron to a magnet. The fact that many of them gain financially is also a reason, but it's deeper than that. They love death.

Why?

Envy - they envy the Creator of life.


15 posted on 07/18/2006 8:19:52 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson