Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airmen, Soldiers thwart terrorists emplacing IED
Air Force Links ^

Posted on 07/17/2006 7:19:30 PM PDT by SandRat

7/17/2006 - BAGHDAD, Iraq (AFPN) -- The combined efforts of Air Force Airmen and Multi-national Division-Baghdad Soldiers foiled the efforts of terrorists today attempting to put into place an improvised-explosive device south of Baghdad.

Airmen from the 11th Expeditionary Air Support Operations Squadron's Joint Terminal Attack Controller unit notified Soldiers from 1st Battalion, 67th Infantry Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, of reports from their F-15E Strike Eagle pilots of four men digging beside a road.

The Soldiers moved to investigate the report and, upon arrival, saw the four suspects flee the area in a van.

The F-15E pilots departed the area to refuel and handed the operation over to an F-16 Fighting Falcon aircrew, which followed the suspects' movements from the sky and spotted them abandoning their vehicle. The pilots continued to relay the information to the JTAC on the ground.

The JTAC was able to lead Soldiers on the ground to the vehicle, where they discovered four 152 mm rounds and detonation cord.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airmen; emplacing; ied; iraq; soldiers; terrorists; thwart
hehehehehehehehe!!!! A real team they Are!!!!
1 posted on 07/17/2006 7:19:33 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

bump


2 posted on 07/17/2006 7:21:21 PM PDT by zot (GWB -- the most slandered man of this decade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
The F-15E pilots departed the area to refuel and handed the operation over to an F-16 Fighting Falcon aircrew, which followed the suspects' movements from the sky and spotted them abandoning their vehicle. The pilots continued to relay the information to the JTAC on the ground.

While a positive story..., a more positive result would have been a strike on the van..., detonating their IED in their LAP!!!!

3 posted on 07/17/2006 7:22:58 PM PDT by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSES
"While a positive story..., a more positive result would have been a strike on the van..., detonating their IED in their LAP!!!!"

Or at least capturing the four. But we got a van.

4 posted on 07/17/2006 7:32:29 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Right on! Great work! Salute!


5 posted on 07/17/2006 7:32:46 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSES

Though that would have been nice, the pilots could not know for sure that they were bad guys. Better to err on the side of caution, that's what makes US the good guys.


6 posted on 07/17/2006 7:34:25 PM PDT by Hazcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
The F-15E pilots departed the area to refuel and handed the operation over to an F-16 Fighting Falcon aircrew, which followed the suspects' movements from the sky and spotted them abandoning their vehicle.

I've read the story twice, and still can't find the sentence where they blow these 4 guys up into little pieces. Did I miss something?

7 posted on 07/17/2006 7:36:25 PM PDT by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WL-law

Nope it just doesn't say.


8 posted on 07/17/2006 7:42:11 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

...and the perps were allowed to live? Why?


9 posted on 07/17/2006 7:55:09 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat
Though that would have been nice, the pilots could not know for sure that they were bad guys. Better to err on the side of caution, that's what makes US the good guys.

I have a lot more respect for our airmen's intelligence.
Digging by the side of a road?
Fleeing in a white van when approached?
Abandoning the van?

WTH?

Fifth graders would be able to connect those dots!

10 posted on 07/17/2006 7:57:48 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Don't know if you've ever been there but it's tougher than you think.


11 posted on 07/17/2006 8:01:56 PM PDT by Hazcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

you can't read the perp's their rights from 15k feet


12 posted on 07/17/2006 8:47:47 PM PDT by cd jones (Liberals: spreading misery, calling it equality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Depends on the ordinance the fighters were carrying. They tend to carry stuff to blow up large areas.

Now, something like an Apache, with a Hellfire, or a 2.75 rocket, which could kill the van without taking out nearby houses ...


13 posted on 07/17/2006 9:09:04 PM PDT by Fatuncle (Of course I'm ignorant. I'm here to learn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat
In WWII we observed no such niceties. The job of the army is to smash, kill and destroy. The "nice" rules of engagement are lengthening the war and also the lives of our troops IMO.

Rommel, the Desert Fox, was injured and taken out of the war by a plane going by who just happened to drop their bombs on the car. The pilot had no idea a general was in the car. Unfortunately the 4 men have gotten away to kill more soldiers.

Until we crush the enemies will to oppose and fight we will never "win". Blasting the enemy, their cities and their families to smithereens worked in Germany and Japan. It would work here too.

14 posted on 07/17/2006 9:21:09 PM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X = they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom

Should read "endangering the lives of our troops"


15 posted on 07/17/2006 9:22:09 PM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X = they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
"...and the perps were allowed to live? Why?"

To see where they fled. This is how you kill an entire cell rather than just the ditch-diggers.

16 posted on 07/17/2006 9:24:19 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom

And I bet Rommel was in a military vehicle which is a legit target. The F15/16 jockeys had no way of knowing FOR SURE that they were bad guys. We don't kill indiscriminately.


17 posted on 07/18/2006 3:45:57 AM PDT by Hazcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat

No he was not in a military vehicle he was in a Mercedes.

But it was Spitfire from the British Air Force who killed his driver and gave him head injuries that took him out of the rest of the war. I am saying we should be killing more "indiscriminately" precisely because it worked in Germany and Japan where we intentionally targeted civillians. You may disagree with the methods we used in WWII but it's how we won.

We have not "defeated" the enemy in Iraq because we are fighting by different rules doctrines of warfare now which we have imposed on ourselves.


18 posted on 07/18/2006 1:46:27 PM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X = they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson