These guys are experts at "Do-Nothing", that they know about.
"But, Five Years After 9/11 The Bush Administration Has Failed To Keep America Safe"
But they have a plan to keep us safer..
Safer than what. 100% record on no attacks after 9/11?
Oh Maybe Dumb@ss Dean means they could keep us 110% safe.
I swear they are like 8 year olds (sorry 8 year olds). You know the, " I know you are but what am I," routine.
They are really, really childlike!(sorry children)
Sounds like a DU'er on dope.
We may not be as safe as we could be, but certainly more so than if a Dim were in office. Of course, the things that WOULD make us more safe, neither of the Big Two Parties has an interest in implementing.
Seal the Border. Repeal ALL gun control laws. Call up citizen militia's to help with policing their neighborhoods/borders.
Any one of those three would be a hell of a lot more effective than the TSA or Homeland inSecurity has been.
Dhimmirats are idjits..
Less safe than when? 9/11?
Democrats.
The party that spent the second half of the 1990s demonizing conservatives and chasing down a non-existent "rash of black owned church fires".
They do nothing for American security. They put party before country.
If we're less safe, why have we not been hit since 9/11? The Rats have no answer for this question.
How does the DNC explain how Clinton's policies kept us safer than we are now?
Imagine these Hezboli attacks with Saddamn and the Taliban in place like the DNC wanted??
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
Shalom Israel
bttt
Where does one begin:
(1) Clinton Administration gave missle guidance technology to Red China (who gave it to rogue states).
Clinton Administration gave nuclear technolgy to North Korea, because a NUT promised not to do bad things with it....he built Nuclear bombs, which he plans to put atop missles that can now hit us, because...see # 1.
Clinton wouldn't go after Osama bin Laden....(see hole where World Trade Center once was).
Clinton didn't go after and KILL those who murdered our soldiers....see what Somolia has become.
Clinton didn't go after those who bombed to USS Cole....
...and this is just a PARTIAL list.
But letting Bin Laden get away up to 12 times as happened during the Clinton years according to two recent books, "Why America Slept" by liberal Gerald Posner, a self-professed 2 time Clinton voter who said he'd not vote for Clinton again even if he could after what he learned of Clinton's inaction on national security, and "Losing Bin Laden" by Richard Minitier those Democratic policies including never responding in any substantive way to at least 10-12 successful and unsuccessful Al Qaeda attacks on US targets during the 90s, yup, all these Democratic policies made us so much safer.
And by the way, if we're no safer, why no Al Qaeda attacks on US soil for 5 years?
I can hear the slogan of the 1972 McGovern Presidential campaign ..."Come Home America" echoing in this drivel.
I take that back he did wipe out the evil men, women and children of the Branch Davidians.
And he did kidnap at machine-gun point one little Cuban boy who's mother died getting him to American and returned him to a communist dictator.
"But, Five Years After 9/11 The Bush Administration Has Failed To Keep America Safe"
Correction: "But, Five Years After 9/11 The NYTs and we Dems have Failed To Bring Jihad Back to America's Shores"
Very convenient.
What retards. Bin Laddie made US less safe. And would like to do it again. Hopes a RAT will be Prez. to facilitate action.
Dems trying to remain relevant.