I almost want to side with the ACLU on this. Businesses that don't want English signs simply don't get my business.
1 posted on
07/14/2006 2:13:24 PM PDT by
E-Mat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: E-Mat
I wonder what the ACLU would say to a proposal to require that all businesses with English signs add Spanish translations...
2 posted on
07/14/2006 2:15:24 PM PDT by
xjcsa
(The internet is not a truck. It's a series of tubes.)
To: E-Mat
At the insistence of the ACLU and their allies, we have voter information pamphlets, Social Security and welfare guides, and DMV tests printed in every conceivable language on Earth but they claim it's unconstitutional to make these people translate their lousy signs into English.
Liberals are the enemies of reason, justice, common sense and the survival of American civilization. They belong on another planet.
3 posted on
07/14/2006 2:17:24 PM PDT by
Argus
To: E-Mat
And they simply won't get help from the English speaking fire dept. and ambulance services who cannot understand their 911 calls and cannot read their signs to determine if they are at the correct location.
THey won't get my business either.
4 posted on
07/14/2006 2:20:05 PM PDT by
Muzzle_em
(taglines are for sissies)
To: E-Mat
I agree with that you should be allowed to post the sign you want in the language you want.
The business owner knows his clientele. If english-only patrons don't feel welcome, they won't come, and his business suffers. The loss is his. But it should remain his choice.
I similarly wouldn't agree with obliging anyone to post signs in spanish. If there is a significant spanish-only population in your area, its probably in your interest to make your business spanish-friendly, but it should always be the business-owner's call.
5 posted on
07/14/2006 2:20:21 PM PDT by
marron
To: E-Mat
Private businesses should not have any interference in what language they use for their signs or their conduct of business. It is PRIVATE business.
6 posted on
07/14/2006 2:22:28 PM PDT by
arthurus
(It was better to fight them OVER THERE than here.)
To: E-Mat
8 posted on
07/14/2006 2:26:02 PM PDT by
pabianice
To: E-Mat
Wait just a minute here! What about the Philly Cheese steak guy? Were'nt they on the other side of that issue?
To: livius
Speaking of an unwillingness to assimilate.....
10 posted on
07/14/2006 2:27:37 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(I'm trying to think but nothing happens)
To: E-Mat
13 posted on
07/14/2006 2:31:46 PM PDT by
Gritty
(The ability to simply wear out the opposition through endless litigation is the 'nuke' of the left-V)
To: E-Mat
Detroit, huh? Yeah, ebonics does need translation ... no question.
14 posted on
07/14/2006 2:32:18 PM PDT by
BluH2o
To: E-Mat
All the signs are already in English at the gun range.
15 posted on
07/14/2006 2:32:24 PM PDT by
Westlander
(Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
To: E-Mat
" Fire Chief John Childs supported the move, arguing that people passing by the site of a fire or other emergency could inform dispatchers about the location more easily if they could read the signs "
Well as long as the address is displayed and the street sign is in english, I would hope the fire dept. could find it.
16 posted on
07/14/2006 2:33:40 PM PDT by
Kakaze
(American: a Citizen of the United States of America........not just some resident of said continent)
To: E-Mat
Let's hope the ACLU doen't put their sign up in English and Fire Department misses it when it burns to the ground.
17 posted on
07/14/2006 2:34:38 PM PDT by
Boiler Plate
(Mom always said why be difficult, when with just a little more effort you can be impossible.)
To: E-Mat
According to the News, Michael J. Steinberg of the ACLU said the proposal is unconstitutional "because it singles out businesses with signs.
So that's what goes for being unconstitutional these days?
To: E-Mat
Good grief what a stupid proposed law.
20 posted on
07/14/2006 2:38:45 PM PDT by
catholicfreeper
(www.theponderingamerican.blogspot.com)
To: E-Mat
What country does the ACLU live in? This is too stupid even for words.
(The Palestinian terrorist regime is the crisis and Israel's fist is the answer.)
21 posted on
07/14/2006 2:39:59 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: E-Mat
"We write to strongly urge you to abandon the measure as... anti-immigrant One would think this would be a great help and learning aid to real immigrants. They would see the word in their native language and then the English equivalent beside it.
I suspect the ACLU's main interest here isn't to help people, they just want to attack everything American.
22 posted on
07/14/2006 2:42:35 PM PDT by
RJL
To: E-Mat
The ACLU should be required to post "Anti-American Communists" outside their offices.
23 posted on
07/14/2006 2:46:54 PM PDT by
Rocky
(Air America: Robbing the poor to feed the Left)
To: E-Mat
Multiculturalism instead of Melting Pot....
Diversity is our Strength...
All cultures are equal....
All religions are worthy of respect....
Bilingual Education -- for illegal immigrants is their right.
Illegal to ask a VOTER to show I.D. to verify identity or citizenship eligibility to vote.
DEMOCRAT politicians OPENLY encouraging illegal immigrants to "participate" in elections and voting..
Welfare for illegal immigrants is their right...
Medical care granted to illegal immigrants, that is DENIED to citizens..
We SHOULD welcome and pay the expenses of child birth for every knocked up illegal immigrant and her bastard child....
Then put them BOTH on every welfare program devised by the warped minds of Leftist Liberals....
Bull Squat!
Ah yes....
Only in America have we nearly succeeded in destroying a nation with stupidity being excused as "kindness and generosity"...
In a few generations at MOST, if we don't address the threats to border, culture and language -- "American" as we knew it will be gone.
If THIS light on the hill goes out....it may take centuries to relight..
Semper Fi
25 posted on
07/14/2006 2:50:11 PM PDT by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: E-Mat
the proposal is unconstitutional "because it singles out businesses with signs.”That doesn't make the law Unconstitional.
If one city can require that signs be in English, another city would be able to require that signs be in Spanish. I don't think we want to go there.
28 posted on
07/14/2006 3:04:29 PM PDT by
sourcery
(A libertarian is a conservative who has been mugged ...by his own government)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson