Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea: Nuclear Test Possible If UN Sanction Is Imposed
RFA ^ | 07/13/06 | Kim Yon-ho

Posted on 07/14/2006 2:25:43 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my translation

N. Korea: Nuclear Test Possible If UN Sanction Is Imposed

2006.07.13

If UN passes sanction against N. Korea, N. Korea may resort to nuclear test, according to some expert. Peter Hayes, a professor at Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology in Australia argued during an interview with RFA that Kim Jong-il may carry it out to show that he does not succumb to U.S. pressure.

Professor Hayes is an expert on energy and security issues. He has been running a project to build small power plants in N. Korea to solve its energy problem. He has visited N. Korea seven times for this project.

In the interview, he suspects that, based on his experience, domestic factors strongly influenced N. Korean decision to push ahead with missile launches. He was visiting N. Korea to discuss his project during 1998 launch of Taepodong-1 missile. At the time, a senior party official explained to Prof. Hayes that it is imperative for N. Korea to show defiance against U.S. because it will maintain pride among starving N. Korean population, and loyalty to Kim Jong-il from military and bureaucracy.

He thinks that things are no different now. Last September, joint agreement was reached at 6-party talks, but N. Korea must have concluded that no progress was made due to U.S. interference. As a result, Kim Jong-il may have found it necessary to side with military and hardliners in favor of missile launches, displaying that he is a strong leader, according to the professor.

Peter Hayes: It was incumbent upon Kim Jong Il to stand strong and be seen to be strong domestically.

External factor is also at play in the decision of N. Korean missile launches at this juncture, according to his analysis. That is, N. Korea may have concluded that it has nothing to lose. The ruling party in S. Korea was crushed in the local election of late May, which would lead to scaling down of aid to N. Korea(by S. Korea,) and U.S. showed no sign of accommodating N. Korean views on nuclear issue. Since China would not easily abandon N. Korea, N. Korea may have calculated that missile launches could provoke Japan which, in turn, draws U.S. attention.

However, Prof. Hayes predicted that, since Kim Jong-il managed to draw attention of the entire world by missile launches, it may go back to negotiation with U.S. again. Nevertheless, if UN Security Council is about to impose sanction of some kind on N. Korea, N. Korea would be severely humiliated, and Kim Jong-il may resort to nuclear test, in order to show that he does not bow to U.S. pressure, he added.

Peter Hayes: If the Security Council does deeply embarrass N. Korea, deeply push on N. Korea, then the other way for Kim Jong Il to recover is to conduct nuclear test.

He predicted that, even if N. Korea goes ahead with nuclear test, it will first show off preliminary steps to the test, to maximize its value as bargaining chip, before the final test.

Washing ton = Kim Yon-ho

/end my translation


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blackmail; brinkmanship; defiance; kimjongil; missilelaunch; mushroomcloud; negotiation; nknukes; northkorea; nucleartest; sanction; un
Good summary of things at play.
1 posted on 07/14/2006 2:25:47 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/14/2006 2:26:15 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Thanks for the translation.


3 posted on 07/14/2006 2:32:56 AM PDT by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Since when does a professor's speculation become Breaking News?
4 posted on 07/14/2006 2:38:40 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Don't you just "love" the way that N Korea and Iran have decided to deal with sanctions from the UN, or reprimands of any kind.

Sort of like a spoiled kid...do that and I'll do this.

With these two "loonies" in charge of countries (Kim Jong Il in NK and "President Tom" as Glenn Beck calls him because he can't pronounce the name, in Iran), it shows more than ever that the UN is useless, and irrelevant in this day and age.


5 posted on 07/14/2006 2:58:42 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

He sure seems eager to fill his assigned roll of kicking off WWIII more overtly.


6 posted on 07/14/2006 3:05:06 AM PDT by Quix (PRAY AND WORK WHILE THERE'S DAY! Many very dark nights are looming. Thankfully, God is still God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Since when does a professor's speculation become Breaking News?

This is a more important story than, say, "Dan Rather mulling CBS lawsuit".

7 posted on 07/14/2006 3:08:18 AM PDT by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
This looks like Kim's disinfo campaign.

Also looks like he may not be nuclear yet. Why wait to test ?

8 posted on 07/14/2006 3:37:34 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

We should give NK a pre-emptive nuclear test, followed by one in Iran for good measure. Courtesy of the US taxpayers! ;)


9 posted on 07/14/2006 4:06:36 AM PDT by Kolb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
so, 'lil kim just wants one little itty bitty test. Plenty of room for it just east of Japan.
10 posted on 07/14/2006 4:22:08 AM PDT by C210N (Bush SPYED, Terrorists DIED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
It appears to me that the best action to take is cutting off all aid, SK beefing up its defenses, and everyone laughing at lil Kim being unable to successfully launch his missile. A nuclear test may not be any more successful than the failed missile.

NK ships transporting weapons to Iran should simply disappear in deep water.
11 posted on 07/14/2006 4:49:58 AM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

One has to wonder WHERE NK would explode a nuke?


12 posted on 07/14/2006 5:19:13 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora; TigerLikesRooster
Since when does a professor's speculation become Breaking News?

a.) The story has not been widely disseminated due to the need for translation.

b.) The story is an integral part of the continuing slow-motion train wreck that is Comrade Chia Pet in North Korea.

c.) Once any Freeper complains about whether or not it is "breaking news", it thereby becomes breaking news. (this is the manifestation of a universal cosmic law which you have unintentionally validated in this instance).

Happy to help. :)

Thanks, TigerLikesRooster!
13 posted on 07/14/2006 5:31:36 AM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

"Don't you just "love" the way that N Korea and Iran have decided to deal with sanctions from the UN, or reprimands of any kind."

I don't mean a thread hijack here but you hit on something that is being overlooked.

North Korea produces missiles. Iran is trying to produce a bomb. Iran buys its missiles from NK. My thought on NK launching wasn't to demonstrate to the US that they could launch, it was to demonstrate to Iran that the short range missile is ready for manufacturing and delivery.

Both countries are working together to get concessions from the US. We aren't seeing this because of the diversion Hizbollah and Hamas caused with regards to Israel.

Out of curiosity, when relating distances, how far is Japan from NK in comparison to Iran and Israel?


14 posted on 07/14/2006 5:53:24 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Democrats - The reason we need term limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

Good, one less weapon we'll have to deal with..


15 posted on 07/14/2006 5:56:27 AM PDT by newnhdad (All your government branches are belong to us!! not for long if this cr@p keeps up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

We should test our neutron bombs north of the DMZ where all the NK artillery is dug in.


16 posted on 07/14/2006 8:10:43 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Afghan protest - "Death to Dog Washers!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Kim Jong-il may resort to nuclear test,

4 ... 3... 2... 1 ....CRICK!

17 posted on 07/14/2006 8:48:55 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson