Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush agrees to submit NSA wiretaps to FISA courts
Stop The ACLU ^ | 13-July-2006 | John Stephenson

Posted on 07/13/2006 9:22:29 AM PDT by Jay777

The ACLU and liberals can now rejoice!!!

Announced by Arlen Specter, reported by CNN and Fox. Hasn’t hit the wires yet but I should have a link soon. Specter called the negotiations with the White House “torturous.”

After giving Geneva rights to the terrorists, the administration are really taking it in the pants this week. My initial reaction is a bit of shock and some disappointment.

(Excerpt) Read more at stoptheaclu.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bushatemyhomework; gramsci
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: InvisibleChurch

I think with the spineless people in charge of this "war" on terror, I may just have to learn to speak Farsi and start reading the Koran and become a muslim. I may then complain to the ACLU if MY phone is tapped or MY email is read.


21 posted on 07/13/2006 10:07:42 AM PDT by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

The CIA is also a hotbed of dimwitted careerists who go back to the Carter Administration, with a liberal (no pun intended) sprinkling of hold-overs from the Clinton regime, which used every resource of the federal government for partisan purposes.


22 posted on 07/13/2006 10:08:05 AM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

what a mess.

the war on terror is heating up, look at what's going on in the mideast now - and we are fighting it by turning more power over to judges to determine how it will be fought.


23 posted on 07/13/2006 10:10:31 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
Bush agrees to submit NSA wiretaps to FISA courts .

This is a misleading title. More phony "redmeat" genneration for the nonthinking class.

The legislation would authorize the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to review the constitutionality of the National Security Agency's most high-profile monitoring operations

Reviewing the constitutionality of the program and having the FISA court approve each and every wiretap are two very different things. If the FISA court says the "program" is constitutional, then Bush has brilliantly shut the mouths of the critics.

24 posted on 07/13/2006 10:12:13 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54
"If, G*d forbid, we have another terrorist attack on this country, the Democrats, SCOTUS, Specter, MSM, et al will look like the "weak on terror" fools they really are."

But that is as bad as the leftists hoping for failure so
THEY can say "told you so".
25 posted on 07/13/2006 10:12:53 AM PDT by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: george wythe

Specter and sphincter are synonymous.


26 posted on 07/13/2006 10:14:24 AM PDT by b4its2late (The Road Map to Peace is looking more like a "Road Map to Pieces")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54

no, that will not work. because the president doesn't take a message to the people expressing outrage over these attempts.

americans don't want geneva protections for terrorists, and americans support the foreign intelligence wiretaps. the president could easily take a message to the people on these two issue - but he doesn't, he doesn't want to fight the apparatus of the left (the courts, the RINOs in the senate) that are defeating him on these issues.

so if a terror attack does occur, he won't be able to back and say "I told you so" - because he isn't telling anyone anything up front, he's just giving in to this.


27 posted on 07/13/2006 10:15:01 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

OK, and when FISA refuses to grant blanket constitutional authority for them - then what? then where are we? try and think a couple of moves ahead.


28 posted on 07/13/2006 10:16:50 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
From what I just read on NewsMax, the proposed bill would give the option to the president weather or not to submit info to the court. It would not be mandatory. Amen.
29 posted on 07/13/2006 10:19:10 AM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

They won't grant a blanket Constitutional Authority but they will rule as they've ruled before that the President has the Constitutional Authority to conduct foreign surveillance and then the critics will still yell that this isn't one of them.


30 posted on 07/13/2006 10:21:07 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Bush isn't going to stop doing what is necessary...he is just pacifying the baby politicians that have their feelings hurt.

By doing THAT, he IS doing his constitutionally mandated job...keeping our country safe.

To hell with the Congress and their lust for power and attention.


31 posted on 07/13/2006 10:21:48 AM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

You're exactly right and this "agreement" gives the President the option to have FISA review it. He'll probably send FISA a couple of border line test cases to see how they're leaning on that day and then if it looks favorable he'll let them see the whole program.


32 posted on 07/13/2006 10:25:37 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I have a feeling that another reason Bush is doing this..is because of that lousy decision by the SCOTUS last week...

He is probably afraid that Specter and gang would send his program to the SCOTUS, hoping for an equally BAD decision that would go their way, instead of the President's.


33 posted on 07/13/2006 10:28:04 AM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
- then what? then where are we? try and think a couple of moves ahead.

Since their say is non-binding, they do the program anyway. This is simple, why make it harder just to scare yourself.

34 posted on 07/13/2006 10:28:08 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

you seem awfully confident of that - in an environemnt where a court just granted geneva protection to terrorists, ignoring article 4 of the geneva agreement.

the bottom line - the court will do whatever it damn well pleases, and whatever political biases it has - will be reflected in the decision rendered. And if it does, and it rules against the administration - WHAT HAPPENS THEN? Do we shut the program down, does the president defy it (he won't)? Do we have the votes in the Senate to authorize it (we don't, just listen to Specter)?


35 posted on 07/13/2006 10:30:45 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

baloney, if this week is any indication - the adminsitration will not defy that ruling, they will comply with it.


36 posted on 07/13/2006 10:32:13 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport

Aw, how'd you guess?


37 posted on 07/13/2006 10:33:44 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

38 posted on 07/13/2006 10:34:20 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

You're right there too and in at least the FISA court they have already ruled that the President has these war time powers.


39 posted on 07/13/2006 10:37:01 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

I thought the court already approved it.


40 posted on 07/13/2006 10:39:08 AM PDT by go-ken-go (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson