Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mollusk fossils push back evolution, ROM scientists say
The Globe and Mail ^ | 7/13/06 | UNNATI GANDHI

Posted on 07/13/2006 6:12:42 AM PDT by doc30

Mollusk fossils push back evolution, ROM scientists say

Life 560 million years ago more advanced than previously believed, article says.

Two Canadian paleontologists have discovered dozens of fossils of a soft-bodied, deep-sea dweller that lived more than half a billion years ago, adding one more piece to the enigmatic puzzle that is the history of life on Earth.

The 189 well-preserved fossil specimens of Odontogriphus omalus have been interpreted as the world's oldest known soft-bodied mollusk, and were found in British Columbia's mountains in the Burgess Shale, one of the most important fossil sites in the world.

The newly discovered fossils are remarkable, one of the researchers notes, because there are perfect impressions of all of the animal's soft tissues.

The fossils show the early mollusk had an oval body ranging in size from a few millimetres to 20 centimetres with simple gill-like structures surrounding a muscular sole or "foot" on the underside.

The stomach, intestines, outer membrane and mouth are all visible.

This discovery pushes back the history of animal evolution tens of millions of years to 560 million years ago in Precambrian time (543 million years ago and earlier), according to the Royal Ontario Museum's David Rudkin, co-author of the article published in today's issue of the journal Nature.

Very few fossil specimens have been found from that time period. The Cambrian Period (543 million to 490 million years ago) marked the sudden appearance of complex multicellular macroscopic organisms.

In the Precambrian era, before the so-called explosion, organisms were thought to be much simpler, but this study shows that was not the case.

"This is a crucial interval in evolutionary history because it seems to represent a time in which a great deal happened," he said.

"Odontogriphus seems to be a late holdover that somehow got preserved in with the creatures from the Cambrian . . . opening up new windows on evolution for us," Mr. Rudkin said.

The specimens were collected over 15 years in the late 1980s and 1990s by the ROM and, upon closer examination, were found to have distinguishing "molluskan" features including a specialized feeding structure called a radula, made up of short rows of small, tooth-like elements that would wave and sweep food into the mouth.

The shell-less mollusks grazed on seafloor bacterial growths.

Odontogriphus, which translates to "toothed riddle" was originally discovered in 1976 from a single, poorly preserved specimen. Until now, it has been described as an "enigmatic organism," according to the study's lead author, Jean-Bernard Caron, also of the ROM.

"Our study redescribes and reinterprets previously unrecognized features that link Odontogriphus to the mollusks, one of the most diverse and important groups of animals living today," Dr. Caron said.

Odontogriphus predates modern-day mollusks -- with 200,000 living species today including snails, clams, squids and octopuses -- which began to develop hard shells during the Cambrian Period to survive.

"They were the last of their kind and they were dying out because the sea floor was changing and all these other animals started developing hard parts and new strategies for dealing with predators," Mr. Rudkin said. "The successful mollusks are those that branched off and developed shells."

Mr. Rudkin said the fact that many mollusks have survived such a catastrophic extinction could shed light on the evolutionary path many animals may take.

"Those lessons we learn from the past -- about where groups of organisms originated, when they become extinct, how they became extinct, or if they didn't become extinct entirely, how they recovered from extinction -- we use that kind of historical background to help us predict what might happen in modern extinction circumstances. Maybe there's a lesson in there for us."


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cambrian; crevolist; evolution; mollusk; pavlovian; precambrian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-137 next last
To: sully777
I'm not a doctor but I received a doctorate from Patriot University and play a scientist-preacher on TV.

You're not a real P.U. grad! Is the basement finished or unfinished? One or two car garage?

61 posted on 07/13/2006 8:34:16 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

You should include a /sarcasm tag in your posting. Otherwise folks might get the wrong idea.


62 posted on 07/13/2006 8:35:04 AM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Just can't fool anybody. :)


63 posted on 07/13/2006 8:38:02 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

One or two car garage? You must be joking: Have you seen what I charge for my videos?


64 posted on 07/13/2006 8:45:03 AM PDT by sully777 (You have flies in your eyes--Catch-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sully777
Just what I thought! You've never even been on the campus of Patriot University. You don't know what kinds of dogs the neighbors have or anything.
65 posted on 07/13/2006 8:54:11 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
RE #53 & #54: And you have the unmitigated temerity, the gall, the effrontery to question my aesthetic sense?

My dear sir - if you're going to go all "Patrick Henry for the Hoplite guy", you had best not bring your own cedentials into question with posts which make an Aztek look good.

Cordially yours,

w00t, etc.

66 posted on 07/13/2006 9:02:12 AM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: doc30

2 more gaps.


67 posted on 07/13/2006 9:05:41 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

I am a doctor! You're going to hell. I and the two shi tzus will pray for your soul.


68 posted on 07/13/2006 9:08:57 AM PDT by sully777 (You have flies in your eyes--Catch-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; sully777

Patriot University's Main Campus

69 posted on 07/13/2006 9:09:41 AM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
RE #53 & #54: And you have the unmitigated temerity, the gall, the effrontery to question my aesthetic sense?

Yeah, not my finest hour.

70 posted on 07/13/2006 9:16:03 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Junior

I guess that lecture hall also doubles as the mail room.


71 posted on 07/13/2006 9:17:32 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Yes! There she is! The real thing. Her hallowed hall and all that.
72 posted on 07/13/2006 9:18:47 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: calex59; Oztrich Boy
"I am NOT a creationists" I believe you

Actually, it is likely that calex59's claim is correct. A plural descriptor is, with few exceptions, not applicable to an individual. In this case, calex59 may be a "creationist", but he or she is probably not a "creationists".
73 posted on 07/13/2006 9:44:36 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith

So... why is that flatworm wearing lipstick?


74 posted on 07/13/2006 9:49:23 AM PDT by Starter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Doesn't sound like evolution to me. Sounds more like GOD!.....

So you're saying God said, "Over the course of the next 50 million years, let there be a sudden appearance of complex multicellular macroscopic organisms with hard parts (as opposed to earlier macroscopic soft organisms)?"

75 posted on 07/13/2006 9:54:49 AM PDT by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Something like that.........


76 posted on 07/13/2006 9:55:57 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: calex59
I will wait until all the facts are in, the dating of these fosils may be off a tad, because some scientist(read most all of them) will fake, cheat, lie, steal and falsify findings in order to prove a theory.

All the facts are never in, in science. But this finding is being published in Nature, the respected peer-reviewed journal, meaning that independent scientists have vetted the methodology, findings and analysis and found them to be significant. It's irresponsible for you to accuse the researchers in this discovery of fraud, without one shred of evidence, withought having even read the article in question.

That all fossils before the Cambrian were "soft" bodied is an old theory and unprovable, as so many postulations from evos are.

You're sure you're not a creationist?

77 posted on 07/13/2006 10:03:06 AM PDT by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: calex59
Don't cry to hard if this proves to be just another fake, designed to fit a theory that so far has been unprovable!

Don't cry to whom?

79 posted on 07/13/2006 10:07:56 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Starter
So... why is that flatworm wearing lipstick?

It's auditioning for a role on Teletubbies, which has homosexual activists giggling in anticipation of Jerry Falwell's statement denouncing it.

80 posted on 07/13/2006 10:13:32 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson