Posted on 07/12/2006 5:55:51 PM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
AG: Adhesive failure target of tunnel probe By Dave Wedge Boston Herald Chief Enterprise Reporter
Wednesday, July 12, 2006 - Updated: 06:47 PM EST
Attorney General Tom Reilly said today the investigation into the Big Dig tunnel collapse is focused primarily on the possible failure of adhesive anchors, a flaw detected as far back as 1999.
The AGs preliminary findings mirror a Bostonherald.com report yesterday that first identified adhesive anchor failure in the section of the tunnel where 38-year-old Milena Del Valle of Jamaica Plain was killed Monday night. Yesterdays Bostonherald.com report also revealed the Mass Pike spent at least $439,000 in 2004 to replace adhesive anchors in the tunnel ceiling.
We have information and documents that a problem with the anchor bolts in this area was identified in 1999, Reilly said in a press conference this afternoon near the accident scene. It was not only identified but there was a plan to address that problem. We are trying to find out now, was that plan implemented.
Reilly said that his own team of engineers is focusing on hardware and is taking control of the scene, categorizing evidence.
A source said that Bechtel officials arrived at the scene this afternoon but they were prohibited from entering by investigators.
U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan was also scheduled to arrive at the accident scene this afternoon.
I was thinking the same thing.
But why suspend a multi-ton concrete
slab over traffic?
There must be some Structural Engineers
reading this thread who can shed some
light on this?
What would you expect of a pork barrel, over budget project that was personally pushed through Congress by the likes of Ted Kennedy and John Kerry. Blame won't be found because of their involvement.
|
"Souds like brain dead engineering to me."
The tried and true method is to imbed hook bolts in the structure --- "but they are so hard to line up and its a lot easier to drill holes and glue the bolts in later."
The original reason given was the need to create a plenum (air duct) to evacuate the exhaust gasses from the tunnel. The reason they were so heavy was they needed to sustain hurricane force winds when they cranked the fans up all the way in the case of an accident and fire. Then, there were some reports that said they didn't need to be so heavy as they were mostly cosmetic.
Now they are taking down all the panels and will reopen the tunnel w/o any because they "think" it will be ok....
If they do indeed need a plenum and they open the tunnel w/o it, and there's a big fire and they can't evacuate the smoke, there might be a major disaster in our future...
...but will anyone dare investigate the building inpectors who signed off on all of the Big Dig's work?
I think the mud guys had a better in with engineering that the tin knockers
Everyone of those panels generated campaign contributions, kickbacks, patronage jobs, jobs for relatives of some politicians.
We would be better off if we just agreed to allow politicians and political parties a 5% skim off of every contract up front.
Including the AG.
It seems to me that the tunnel design requirements
drove this creation without a reasonable
regard for safety. Therefore, it becomes OK
to suspend 2 tons of concrete over someone's
head with superglue. Amazing how requirements
that should make things safer now end up
causing a death, truly tragic.
.
These firms wil keep the usual 33% to %40 in 'fees' to be kicked back to the AG (after he 'retires' and joins the firm) or the democratic party: see Spitzer in NY.
For the AG it's a win-win situation: he gets to grandstad about gong after the dastardly manufacturer while creaming a fortune in kickbacks from the law firms.
Bangladesh on the Bay.
All the more reason for the US atty to get on the stick.
'NUFF SAID!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.