Skip to comments.
Supercomputers help physicists understand a force of nature
University of Washington News Office ^
| 11 July 2006
| Staff (press release)
Posted on 07/12/2006 9:07:26 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Bold and underlining added by me. Contact info at the end of the original article is omitted.
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
| SciencePing |
An elite subset of the Evolution list. See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
2
posted on
07/12/2006 9:08:36 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
To: PatrickHenry
Genesis 11:6 And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
3
posted on
07/12/2006 9:11:50 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
===> Placemarker <===
4
posted on
07/12/2006 9:13:05 AM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
The work was paid for in part by grants from the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation.This is certainly a good and proper use of taxpayer money.</sarcasm>
It's just as Constitutional as the National Endowment for the Arts and NPR.
6
posted on
07/12/2006 9:39:42 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: newgeezer
Seriously, you can't think of a Constitutionally relevant use of nuclear physics? Really?
7
posted on
07/12/2006 9:44:34 AM PDT
by
Physicist
To: PatrickHenry
It should be pointed out that while this result is new, the general technique of Lattice QCD is more than 20 years old. The hardware is finally getting to the point where the theory can live up to its full potential.
8
posted on
07/12/2006 9:47:13 AM PDT
by
Physicist
To: newgeezer
"This is certainly a good and proper use of taxpayer money.</sarcasm>"
Absolutely. The government has no rational for funding nuclear research. You betcha.
9
posted on
07/12/2006 9:56:24 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(non-evangelical atheist)
To: PatrickHenry
"any old quark masses would do."
A phrase never used before in human history.
To: newgeezer; MineralMan; Physicist
iirc, in the Constitution, the Congress is explicitly authorized to support the "useful arts" (ie: science, technology, industry)
been a few months since I last read the USC, so I may be mistaken
11
posted on
07/12/2006 11:16:02 AM PDT
by
King Prout
(many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
To: King Prout
Constitution of the US, Article I, Section 8 - Powers of Congress:
8. To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries:
12
posted on
07/12/2006 11:19:57 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
To: PatrickHenry
I don't think this clause justifies NPR. I used to listen to NPR when it was the only source of classical music, but they dropped music, and I picked up XM radio as part of my DirecTV package.
As with so many other things, that which you pay for is better and cheaper than that which is "free."
13
posted on
07/12/2006 11:25:39 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: PatrickHenry
hrmn... patents, but not funding. i appear to have been in error.
14
posted on
07/12/2006 11:47:17 AM PDT
by
King Prout
(many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
To: Physicist
Whenever I hear "lattice functions", I think of Lebesgue integration.
15
posted on
07/12/2006 12:15:49 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(The ultimate in wisdom is to live in the present, plan for the future and profit from the past.~Anon)
To: PatrickHenry; All
Great article, PH. Here's an animation of a quark-antiquark pair modeled using the lattice gauge QCD mentioned in the article. (A description of this as well as some other cool animations can be found
here (Visualizations of Quantum Chromodynamics). )

I saw many of these simulations at a talk I attended about a year ago. Lattice QCD appears the to be the best shot we yet have at modeling the internal behavior of nuclear matter (something that is not nearly as well-understood as we would like it to be). Lattice QCD is very mathematically intensive work; it takes a lot of computing muscle to do these types of simulations.
16
posted on
07/12/2006 12:22:41 PM PDT
by
Quark2005
("Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs." -Matthew 7:6)
To: King Prout
hrmn... patents, but not funding. i appear to have been in error. But they funded scientific work anyway. Navy ships were used for charting coasts, exploring, that kind of thing. Defense related, arguably. And then there's the Lewis & Clark expedition, the granddaddy of all scientific programs (with other reasons to give it some cover, I suppose).
17
posted on
07/12/2006 12:44:36 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
To: King Prout
"iirc, in the Constitution, the Congress is explicitly authorized to support the "useful arts" (ie: science, technology, industry)
been a few months since I last read the USC, so I may be mistaken
"
Yup. It's there in Article I.
18
posted on
07/12/2006 1:01:17 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(non-evangelical atheist)
To: Physicist
Seriously, you can't think of a Constitutionally relevant use of nuclear physics? And you end up with $billions handed over to ADM for ethanol using the same justification. Ain't no different. Mercantilism, (or corporate welfare, if you prefer) pure and simple.
It isn't the function of government. Period.
To: Physicist
The hardware is finally getting to the point where the theory can live up to its full potential. Was the solution memory, bandwidth, or CPU limited? Or a combination?
Cheers!
20
posted on
07/12/2006 7:22:01 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson