Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stephanopoulos Embarrassingly Backtracks from Charge Iraq Precluded Korea Nuke Fix ( Clintonista )
News Busters ^ | July 10, 2006 | Brent Baker

Posted on 07/10/2006 7:43:25 AM PDT by george76

On Sunday's This Week, during the roundtable discussion, host George Stephanopoulos embarrassed himself and had to backtrack after he raised Clinton Defense Secretary William Perry's recommendation -- that President Bush bomb the nuclear missiles on the launchpad in North Korea -- but then went a step further and combined Perry's proposal with blaming the Iraq war for preventing that type of action in 2003, only to be thoroughly refuted by George Will.

“I don't even believe what I said,” Stephanopoulos sheepishly conceded, “So I take it back, you're right.”

Stephanopoulos had proposed: “What if in 2003, instead of invading Iraq, President Bush takes out the reprocessing facilities in North Korea, which according to Secretary Perry, President Clinton was willing to do back in 1993 before they started the negotiations?

We would be in a far different place."

How ground troops in Iraq precluded one of many Navy ships not committed to Iraq from firing off a few missiles at a target, Stephanopoulos did not explain.

But Will pointed out how “the capital of South Korea is 30 miles away from the 38th parallel, North Korea, and we don't know what kind of spasm might result from this irrational regime. North Korea could destroy that capital without a soldier leaving the North Korea and using entirely conventional weapons."

To which, Stephanopoulos offered his retraction and quickly segued to the Lieberman Senate race.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; bush; clintonista; dod; georgewill; iraq; korea; lieberman; missile; navy; northkorea; perry; presidentbush; senate; stephanopoulos; terrorism; waronterror; will; williamperry; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Reaganesque
Which, of course, begs the question, what else have you said that you didn't believe? Have you made such statements before when you didn't have anyone around to refute you?

Exactly what I was thinking...further, we know that you wouldn't have owned up to this if you hadn't been caught.

I guessed he worked for billyblythe for some time.

21 posted on 07/10/2006 8:28:12 AM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Clinton was busy with his White House coffee meetings...taking money for his library fund from the Communists in trade our missle and nuclear technology.


22 posted on 07/10/2006 8:28:41 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mannaggia l'America

LOL - good one


23 posted on 07/10/2006 8:30:59 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (LINCOLN: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Deb

LOL

That is Stupid translated, I looked it up online. How great is that!
Putz did not come up! LOL


24 posted on 07/10/2006 8:32:22 AM PDT by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mannaggia l'America

LOL


25 posted on 07/10/2006 8:32:36 AM PDT by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

Seoul is the price that would be paid for any act of war against NK. In fact, the single most threatening act that South Korea could commit against the North would be to evacuate their own capital city.


26 posted on 07/10/2006 8:37:51 AM PDT by MainFrame65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: george76
No big deal. Georgie made a very stupid mistake. About par for the course. He was a Cintonista and always will be. Nothing new to see here. Time to move on. However, this video news report is sending ripples of discontent around the web:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueAdeZuns3A

27 posted on 07/10/2006 8:47:20 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Gotta love that rough tough Clinton guy. The "woulda, coulda, shoulda" presidency.


28 posted on 07/10/2006 8:54:28 AM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

If only Clinton wasn't elected...He wouldn't have given a Communist Dictator Uranium and $800 Million annually...

Damn Perot voters!


29 posted on 07/10/2006 9:22:09 AM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: george76

The Dems are gung-ho to fight wars we are not fighting. Its how they strut and act brave while undercutting the actual war we are fighting.

Does anyone remember how many leading Dems and Dem journalists, during the run-up to the war in 2003, insisted that we attack North Korea, that NK was the real threat? This all the while we were moving troops into the middle east, preparing to invade Iraq. It was clear to me at least that NK was rattling sabers in an effort to distract us from Iraq. Bush refused to be distracted. But the Dems seized on NK as an opportunity to pose as tough militarists.

The catch is that we know what they would do if we were serious about NK. They would do what they did; promise them anything, free fuel, a free nuke plant, anything. Because that is exactly what Clinton and Carter did do. They had no interest in a confrontation with NK when it was their turn at the helm.


30 posted on 07/10/2006 9:37:57 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

StuffinEnvelopes making a fool out of himself is nothing new.


31 posted on 07/10/2006 9:52:56 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Anointed lefty media analysts thinking through only one checkers move in a game of three dimensional chess. As always.

Oh, and Bill Clinton threatened to kick some country's butt again, right?

32 posted on 07/10/2006 9:55:58 AM PDT by Ghengis (Alexander was a wuss!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
Damn Perot voters!

Quit blaming the voters. If GHWB had been such a great President, he would have been re-elected. He didn't even show a serious campaign for re-election. He acted like he really wasn't interested in being re-elected. The voters needed some sign of leadership that was lacking and that wasn't Bill Clinton.
33 posted on 07/10/2006 10:01:48 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Catching StuffinEnvelopes making a fool out of himself , again, is fun.


34 posted on 07/10/2006 10:07:45 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise; Grampa Dave
Needs repeating...

The "woulda, coulda, shoulda" presidency.

35 posted on 07/10/2006 10:08:51 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ghengis

Clinton and his Clintonistas would loose even at checkers.


36 posted on 07/10/2006 10:11:11 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: george76

"This Week With an Idiot"


37 posted on 07/10/2006 10:11:36 AM PDT by ushr435
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

ROFLMAO. Yep. Redeploy to Okinawa. Ruthlessly bomb North Korea in 2003. Negotiate to give nuclear material to unstable regimes.

They're brilliant really.

LOL.


38 posted on 07/10/2006 10:11:42 AM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Oh look everybody...It's a hijacker.


39 posted on 07/10/2006 10:14:21 AM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: george76

The panel this week also included Donna Brazile, another font of wisdom. So I guess the show should be named:

"This Week With a Couple of Idiots"


40 posted on 07/10/2006 10:15:29 AM PDT by ushr435
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson