Carnival puts bite on Hillary's brother

"This article reminds us of the almost daily stink of the Clintons."

I'm reminded of when sissy boy was running for president.

Some newscaster was interviewing people from Arkansas to get an idea of who sissy boy was. The gentleman said something to the effect that the country didn't know what it was in for.

Boy, did he have that right.

Um. I don't think you can get a refund on a bribe.

Found this little tidbit:

...According to the [House Government Reform Committee] report, Rodham met the Gregorys at an event to raise money for Clinton's second term and approached them in 1997 about retaining him to explore new business opportunities.

With the assistance of his sister, Hillary, Rodham helped the Gregorys get contracts to stage carnivals at the White House in 1998 and 2000, the report said.

A federal jury in Mobile, Alabama, convicted the Gregorys of fraud in 1982 in connection with improprieties at two banks they owned.

Part of the conviction was overturned, and in 1986 the case ended when the Gregorys pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy and misapplication of bank funds. Both were given probation.

Source

And, according to the committee (from the Times article): The Gregorys had sought pardons because they thought their criminal records would disqualify them from winning state carnival contracts, according to the report.

Funny that state carnival oversight has higher standards than the Clinton White House did.

Since the Gregorys would have paid Hell booking a White House event if they had told Tony to go fly a kite, it's kinda' difficult to determine what part was bribery & what part was extortion. And, I'm guessing that so long as your 'payment for services rendered' comes in the form of a 'loan', it doesn't count as taxable income.

Remember that the Clintons(spit) are trailertrash and Hag Hillary is uppity ugly trailertrash.

I cracked up laughing,

you have a good memory.

By the way when he was finished, so was his party.

.......In 1994 (Sen. Barbarba Boxer's) daughter, Nicole Boxer, married Tony Rodham, brother of then First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, in a ceremony at the White House. The couple had one son, Zachary, and divorced in 2000.[3]

http://www.answers.com/topic/barbara-boxer#wp-_note-2

_______________________________________________________

Judge Capua is Pictured here with President Clinton at a dinner party at Vernon Jordan's Home in Washington on behalf of Tony Rodham and Nicole Boxer's Marriage. Mr. Kelly, pictured on the left, is President Clinton's Step Father, and Attorney Marisa Pia, pictured on the right, is Mr. Capua's Daughter.

http://www.floridamediationgroup.com/referenc/spcscrap.html

This is the same Hillary brother who married/impregnated/divorced the daughter of Senator Boxer?

Few years back, there was a big contretemps when Anthony was discovered in flagrante delicto with his neighbor's wife......while Boxer's grandchild was elsewhere on the premises.

Marisa Pia, pictured on the right, is Mr. Capua's Daughter.

That picture is creepy. Look at the way the 'Toon is looking at her.

--The Two-Legged Snake In a Crusty Pants Suit -----

ROFL!

My 15 year old son is interested in knowing just what the Clintons did that was horrible.
He wants to be able to discuss it intelligently with others. It can't take forever, these are short attention spanned teens, not homeschoolers. :D
What, in your opinion, are the worst things that happened in the Clinton presidency??
Short version (not length of list, just items, I can describe them in more depth)

ping

....Did Hugh Rodham ever pay back the hundreds of thousands of dollars in other "loans" he received for his "work" on the pardons????.......

All Hugh got was a promissory note from Hillary who actually ended up with the money

Ha! You were smart not to want a long list!
My daughter (18) just graduated from H.S., and is very conservative.
Here are the things that she found most offensive:
1. The whole Lewinsky thing, and how he soiled the Oval Office.
2. 'That depends on what the meaning of is is'. Huh?
3. The selling of our secrets to the Chinese.
4. The way that folks just kept, uh, 'dying' in the administration. Vince Foster, Ron Brown, to name a few.
Arkanacide?
5. The 'oral/anal sex isnt really sex' debacle. In order to try to save himself, he has caused things to go on in the teen population such as STDs in middle school. I mean, if the PRESIDENT says that it isnt sex..../sarc
There is the short list. Do you get the feeling that I could go on for days? ;-)

You might want to tell your son, too, the story of how, as President Bush was being sworn in for his 1st term, there was a team in the Oval Office scrubbing down and painting everything! Even the ceiling! (dontya know it NEEDED it? ewwww)
I love this story!

OH MY.....A Rodham that is tainted?????? Who would have thought it........(sac/on)

Article II, Section 3, of the United States Constitution provides:

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information on the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Articles of Impeachment follow:

Article 1: Perjury before Independent Counsel Ken Starr's grand jury.

In his conduct while President of the United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has willfully corrupted and manipulated the judicial process of the United States for his personal gain and exoneration, impeding the administration of justice, in that:

On August 17, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton swore to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth before a Federal grand jury of the United States. Contrary to that oath, William Jefferson Clinton willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony to the grand jury concerning one or more of the following:

(1) the nature and details of his relationship with a subordinate Government employee;

(2) prior perjurious, false and misleading testimony he gave in a Federal civil rights action brought against him;

(3) prior false and misleading statements he allowed his attorney to make to a Federal judge in that civil rights action; and

(4) his corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of witnesses and to impede the discovery of evidence in that civil rights action.

In doing this, William Jefferson Clinton has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore, William Jefferson Clinton, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.

(Approved 21-16 by the House Judiciary Committee on Friday, December 11, 1998)
(Passed 228-206 in the House of Representatives at 1:25 p.m. on Saturday, December 19, 1998)

Article 2: Perjury in the Paula Jones civil case.

In his conduct while President of the United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has willfully corrupted and manipulated the judicial process of the United States for his personal gain and exoneration, impeding the administration of justice, in that:

(1) On December 23, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton, in sworn answers to written questions asked as part of a Federal civil rights action brought against him, willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony in response to questions deemed relevant by a Federal judge concerning conduct and proposed conduct with subordinate employees.

(2) On January 17, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton swore under oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth in a deposition given as part of a Federal civil rights action brought against him. Contrary to that oath, William Jefferson Clinton willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony in response to questions deemed relevant by a Federal judge concerning the nature and details of his relationship with a subordinate Government employee, his knowledge of that employee's involvement and participation in the civil rights action brought against him, and his corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of that employee.

In all of this, William Jefferson Clinton has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.
Wherefore, William Jefferson Clinton, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.

(Approved 20-17 by the House Judiciary Committee on Friday, December 11, 1998)
(Failed 229-205 in the House of Representatives at 1:42 p.m. on Saturday, December 19, 1998)

Article 3: Obstruction of Justice related to the Jones case.

In his conduct while President of the United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, and has to that end engaged personally, and through his subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or scheme designed to delay, impede, cover up, and conceal the existence of evidence and testimony related to a Federal civil rights action brought against him in a duly instituted judicial proceeding.
The means used to implement this course of conduct or scheme included one or more of the following acts:

(1) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to execute a sworn affidavit in that proceeding that he knew to be perjurious, false and misleading.

(2) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to give perjurious, false and misleading testimony if and when called to testify personally in that proceeding.

(3) On or about December 28, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly engaged in, encouraged, or supported a scheme to conceal evidence that had been subpoenaed in a Federal civil rights action brought against him.

(4) Beginning on or about December 7, 1997, and continuing through and including January 14, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton intensified and succeeded in an effort to secure job assistance to a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him in order to corruptly prevent the truthful testimony of that witness in that proceeding at a time when the truthful testimony of that witness would have been harmful to him.

(5) On January 17, 1998, at his deposition in a Federal civil rights action brought against him, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly allowed his attorney to make false and misleading statements to a Federal judge characterizing an affidavit, in order to prevent questioning deemed relevant by the judge. Such false and misleading statements were subsequently acknowledged by his attorney in a communication to that judge.

(6) On or about January 18 and January 20-21, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton related a false and misleading account of events relevant to a Federal civil rights action brought against him to a potential witness in that proceeding, in order to corruptly influence the testimony of that witness.

(7) On or about January 21, 23 and 26, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton made false and misleading statements to potential witnesses in a Federal grand jury proceeding in order to corruptly influence the testimony of those witnesses. The false and misleading statements made by William Jefferson Clinton were repeated by the witnesses to the grand jury, causing the grand jury to receive false and misleading information.

In all of this, William Jefferson Clinton has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore, William Jefferson Clinton, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.

(Approved 21-16 by the House Judiciary Committee on Friday, December 11, 1998)
(Passed 221-212 in the House of Representatives at 1:59 p.m. on Saturday, December 19, 1998)

Article 4: Abuse of Power by making perjurious statements to Congress in his answers to the 81 questions posed by the Judiciary Committee.

Using the powers and influence of the office of President of the United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has engaged in conduct that resulted in misuse and abuse of his high office, impaired the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, and contravened the authority of the legislative branch and the truth-seeking purpose of a coordinate investigative proceeding in that, as President, William Jefferson Clinton, refused and failed to respond to certain written requests for admission and willfully made perjurious, false and misleading sworn statements in response to certain written requests for admission propounded to him as part of the impeachment inquiry authorized by the House of Representatives of the Congress of the United States.

William Jefferson Clinton, in refusing and failing to respond, and in making perjurious, false and misleading statements, assumed to himself functions and judgments necessary to the exercise of the sole power of impeachment vested by the Constitution in the House of Representatives and exhibited contempt for the inquiry.

In doing this, William Jefferson Clinton has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore, William Jefferson Clinton, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.

(Approved 21-16 by the House Judiciary Committee on Saturday, December 12, 1998)
(Failed 285-148 in the House of Representatives at 2:15 p.m. on Saturday, December 19, 1998)

The United States Senate consciously refused to do its Constitutional duties and acquitted William Clinton.

In April, 1999, about two months after being acquitted by the Senate, Clinton was cited by
Federal District Judge Susan Webber Wright for civil contempt of court for his "willful failure" to obey her repeated orders to testify truthfully in the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit. For this citation, Clinton was assessed a $90,000 fine, and the matter was referred to the Arkansas Supreme Court to see if disciplinary action would be appropriate.

Regarding Clinton's January 17, 1998 deposition where he was placed under oath, the judge wrote:
"Simply put, the president's deposition testimony regarding whether he had ever been alone with Ms. (Monica) Lewinsky was intentionally false and his statements regarding whether he had ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky likewise were intentionally false . . ."

Later--in January, 2001, on the day before leaving office--Clinton agreed to a five year suspension of his Arkansas law license as part of an agreement with the independent counsel to end the investigation. Based on this suspension, Clinton was also automatically suspended from the United States Supreme Court bar, from which he chose to resign.

Clinton's resignation was mostly symbolic, as he had never practiced before the Supreme Court and was not expected to in the future. The Paula Jones lawsuit was eventually settled out of court for $850,000.

This is just part of what the Chief Executive of the most ethical administration did while in office.

Hillary's other brother ..Hugh Rodham

Ok, so I left out the perjury part...
I was relating what my teen daughter found most disgusting.
Btw, let me know how you get a teen boy to sit down and read what you wrote, no matter how informative it was.
I had a great time reading it! Brings back old (bad) memories! ;-)

Tony Rodham

Well thank you, I think that I will skip breakfast now.
Lunch, too.

Tony Rodham's mother-in-law , Barbara Boxer