Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Threat From North Korea
SpaceWar.com ^ | 07/07/06 | by Anthony H. Cordesman

Posted on 07/07/2006 1:44:49 PM PDT by garbageseeker

The same North Korean ICBM efforts that throw a rock at Alaska can throw a large nuclear warhead at every ally the United States has in Northeast Asia. Japan and South Korea are not only close allies, they are critical trading partners. The risk of a war in this part of the world would inevitably threaten Chinese involvement in some form, and possible bloc trade with much of China for an extended period even if China did not become involved. Our troops and our bases in most of Asia would be at hazard as well.

Americans need to stop thinking parochially and selfishly and start thinking strategically. North Korea does not have to be able to hit the United States with meaningful nuclear threats to do much to deter or damage the United States

(Excerpt) Read more at spacewar.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: atomic; china; clintonlegacy; cordesman; geopolitics; iaea; icbm; iran; iranianmissiles; japan; kimiljong; kimjongil; koreanpeninsula; lefties; liberalopinion; looneyleft; missile; mushroomcloud; nationalreview; northkorea; nuclearwar; nukewars; opinion; proliferation; rodong; scud; scudmissile; southkorea; taepodong; taepodong1; taepodong2; wwiii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
This is a rather interesting article. I would like your comments on it.There is a slight bias in the article and does not take into account of threat of a missile attack by North Koreans on the continential United States in the long range.
1 posted on 07/07/2006 1:44:56 PM PDT by garbageseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

The real threat from NK is that they are going into the export business.


2 posted on 07/07/2006 1:47:03 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

I say the next time they start fueling one of these things, we should send a submarine based, GPS guided cruise missle to the launch pad.


3 posted on 07/07/2006 1:47:12 PM PDT by Paloma_55 (I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
That have already have exporting business. They sell their missiles to Iran
4 posted on 07/07/2006 1:47:59 PM PDT by garbageseeker (It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

I agree


5 posted on 07/07/2006 1:48:21 PM PDT by garbageseeker (It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

Why can't China do something about their crazy aunt in the attic? hint: they're bankrolling these launches.


6 posted on 07/07/2006 1:50:42 PM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Bump

China is also providing them with fuel and food. Most likely goes directly to the party bosses and the military.
7 posted on 07/07/2006 1:52:26 PM PDT by garbageseeker (It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55
I say the next time they start fueling one of these things, we should send a submarine based, GPS guided cruise missle to the launch pad.

Yep...and release a tape with an OBL lookalike taking full credit.

8 posted on 07/07/2006 1:53:21 PM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
hint: they're bankrolling these launches.

To see if we react and how. It's like getting your little cousin to throw a rock at your neighbors house and letting him get in trouble for it. If no consequences, it's only a matter of time and you'll be able to do the same with impunity.

9 posted on 07/07/2006 1:53:33 PM PDT by b4its2late (Schumer is such an ass......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
"One other point. When it comes to political posturing, the Bush administration deserves a bit of credit on its own. Talking about activating an unproven ballistic missile defense, whose booster seems to have serious reliability problems, to deal with a test it probably was almost certain would never hit the United States was posturing on its own."

This guy is worried about our defense shield. He goes on to ridicule the idea. He and the chicoms are dying to know how accurate it is. LOL!

10 posted on 07/07/2006 1:54:57 PM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

All these countries that think We're too bogged down in I and A to be a real threat, seem to discount the fact that our Navy and AF are basically idol.


11 posted on 07/07/2006 1:56:55 PM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

I heard a fellow on the Glenn Beck show yesterday call in and say that every time North Korea launches something, the US radar systems (and presumably the defense systems in Alaska) light up to track the NK missile.

He said the Chinese watch this with their own systems (including satellites) to determine ways to evade or neutralize them. I don't know how accurate this comment is, but Beck said he would investigate it.

If this is true, then China and NK are in cahoots, as most of us think they are.

China has another interest here - to let the USA spend a portion of our treasure on defense systems and on bases in South Korea. They figure, I think, that they can always get someone to give them the design and operational secrets when the defense systems are developed - just like they did with missile guidance systems in the Clinton years.


12 posted on 07/07/2006 1:57:30 PM PDT by RandyRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
This guy is worried about our defense shield. He goes on to ridicule the idea

Sounds like a liberal.
13 posted on 07/07/2006 1:57:55 PM PDT by garbageseeker (It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RandyRep
He said the Chinese watch this with their own systems (including satellites) to determine ways to evade or neutralize them. I don't know how accurate this comment is, but Beck said he would investigate

I have heard this too.
14 posted on 07/07/2006 2:02:34 PM PDT by garbageseeker (It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

IMO we should take out the NK government and its nuclear capability for both strategic and humanitarian reasons. It saddens me to think of the millions of starving and tortured people there, struggling from one day to the next with very little hope of survival.


15 posted on 07/07/2006 2:03:51 PM PDT by American Quilter (Equal laws protecting equal rights...the best guarantee of loyalty and love of country. -- Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

You reminded me of this thread. They never did figure it out. http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1661514/posts


16 posted on 07/07/2006 2:04:00 PM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
This "analysis" seems nuts to me.

"Semi-suicidal" if NK launches a preemptive nuclear strike?

If NK were to do that, it would be over in minutes - his million man army and all.

The writer goes on about what a threat NK is to our allies in the area, and then goes on about how Bush overreacted to the threat and how that threat is no real threat yet to the US... Duh, they're our allies... A threat to our allies is a threat to ourselves. An attack on Japan is an attack on the US for all practical purposes.

Sorry, but this guy sounds like an idiot to me.
17 posted on 07/07/2006 2:05:18 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

Bump


18 posted on 07/07/2006 2:05:59 PM PDT by garbageseeker (It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

I see the note at the bottom that this was "extracted" from a longer paper. I wonder if the long version was the same sort of disjointed rambling.

As to lighting up their missile on the ground - just keep in mind that it would mean the immediate destruction of Seoul and the deaths of a great many of its residents. North Korea has artillery - some of it possibly loaded with chemical or biological weapons - in range of the entire city, and we would not be able to take it out fast enough to save the city.


19 posted on 07/07/2006 2:06:13 PM PDT by xjcsa (Ted Stevens: The internet is not a truck. It's a series of tubes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandyRep
The other side to that is, that China does not want Japan to go nuclear.

NK is pushing Japan towards that end. And I have no doubt Japan would provide a formidable deterrent.
20 posted on 07/07/2006 2:08:14 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson