To: RobRoy; TonyRo76
"blue laws" pertaining to alcohol are hypocritical, misguided, and an excuse for meddlesome bureaucrats to intrude where they don't belong
Is there any point, at all, where the actions of the person who imbibed are anyone else's business, or would that be only if s/he did something that involved/harmed another PERSON?
To: Froufrou
Is there any point, at all, where the actions of the person who imbibed are anyone else's business,It would not be the business of government.
or would that be only if s/he did something that involved/harmed another PERSON?
"Involvement/Harm" is not the standard. If a person's rights have been violated by another, it becomes government's legitimate business. Not unless or until.
405 posted on
07/10/2006 7:38:11 AM PDT by
Protagoras
(("Minimum-wage laws are one of the most powerful tools in the arsenal of racists." - Walter Williams)
To: Froufrou
>>Is there any point, at all, where the actions of the person who imbibed are anyone else's business, or would that be only if s/he did something that involved/harmed another PERSON?<<
You mean on Sunday, as opposed to any other day? ;)
406 posted on
07/10/2006 7:43:29 AM PDT by
RobRoy
(The Internet is doing to Evolution what it did to Dan Rather. Information is power.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson