Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SolidSupplySide
You assume facts that are not in evidence. Re: DeLay. Very hit-and-run of you. Very Houston Chronicle (who endorsed Campbell, BTW) and Ronnie Earle of you.

Also: If the race is DeLay vs. Lampson, Lampson wins.

If the race were Campbell vs. Lampson, Campbell would have won.

Your fantastic prognostication skills did not extend to predicting the DeLay-Campbell race properly.

177 posted on 07/06/2006 1:41:26 PM PDT by AmishDude (First Supreme Emperor of the NAU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude
Your fantastic prognostication skills did not extend to predicting the DeLay-Campbell race properly.

Yeah, I predicted DeLay would win with 60% of the vote (see over-under). DeLay won with 62%. I concede I was off on that. But I was certainly closer than anyone else!

You are confusing me wanting Campbell to win the primary and me predicting Campbell would win the primary. I predicted both DeLay's margin of victory and his eventual problems in the general with uncanny accuracy.

178 posted on 07/06/2006 1:46:28 PM PDT by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

To: AmishDude
Your fantastic prognostication skills did not extend to predicting the DeLay-Campbell race properly.

Where did he say he predicted Campbell would beat DeLay in the primay? Please post evidence of this.
179 posted on 07/06/2006 1:46:31 PM PDT by Quick1 (There is no Theory of Evolution. Just a list of animals Chuck Norris allows to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson