To: SolidSupplySide
You assume facts that are not in evidence. Re: DeLay. Very hit-and-run of you. Very Houston Chronicle (who endorsed Campbell, BTW) and Ronnie Earle of you.
Also: If the race is DeLay vs. Lampson, Lampson wins.
If the race were Campbell vs. Lampson, Campbell would have won.
Your fantastic prognostication skills did not extend to predicting the DeLay-Campbell race properly.
177 posted on
07/06/2006 1:41:26 PM PDT by
AmishDude
(First Supreme Emperor of the NAU!)
To: AmishDude
Your fantastic prognostication skills did not extend to predicting the DeLay-Campbell race properly. Yeah, I predicted DeLay would win with 60% of the vote (see over-under). DeLay won with 62%. I concede I was off on that. But I was certainly closer than anyone else!
You are confusing me wanting Campbell to win the primary and me predicting Campbell would win the primary. I predicted both DeLay's margin of victory and his eventual problems in the general with uncanny accuracy.
To: AmishDude
Your fantastic prognostication skills did not extend to predicting the DeLay-Campbell race properly.
Where did he say he predicted Campbell would beat DeLay in the primay? Please post evidence of this.
179 posted on
07/06/2006 1:46:31 PM PDT by
Quick1
(There is no Theory of Evolution. Just a list of animals Chuck Norris allows to live.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson