[SolidSupplySide]

Yes, but I believe Mr. Campbell is not the preferred candidate (excepting Delay himself) of either the party or the local voters, is he?

62% of Republican voters preferred the corrupt DeLay. So Campbell didn't make it through the primary. A majority of general election voters will not vote for DeLay. Neither Campbell nor DeLay is the preferred candidate of the party and local voters.

If the race is DeLay vs. Lampson, Lampson wins.

If the race were Campbell vs. Lampson, Campbell would have won. That's why I supported Campbell, because I wanted a Republican to represent TX22.

[AmishDude]

You assume facts that are not in evidence. Re: DeLay. Very hit-and-run of you. Very Houston Chronicle (who endorsed Campbell, BTW) and Ronnie Earle of you.

Also: If the race is DeLay vs. Lampson, Lampson wins.

If the race were Campbell vs. Lampson, Campbell would have won.

Your fantastic prognostication skills did not extend to predicting the DeLay-Campbell race properly.

[fortheDeclaration]

Lampson would not beat Delay.

It would be closer then Delay wanted and would generate a great deal of DNC support.

Moreover, your claims to be for a GOP 'victory' ring hollow since you have admitted not voting for Delay in the past.

He did not meet your 'purity' standards.

But I do not think George Washington could have met them either.