To: Mike Darancette
The hyped danger is the linchpin for civil disobedience. What we need are people to start calling 911 every time they see somebody lighting up a cigarette. The police and 911 operators may be annoyed, but how can they dispute the legitimacy of the calls when they are employed by the same local governments that repeatedly hype the fact that smokers subject us to death or grievous bodily harm, no less than a psychopath wielding a chainsaw?
By insisting that second-hand smoke is a killer, how will they react to someone who uses deadly force against a smoker?
8 posted on
07/05/2006 11:06:13 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Joe 6-pack
What we need are people to start calling 911 every time they see somebody lighting up a cigarette. The police and 911 operators may be annoyed, but how can they dispute the legitimacy of the calls when they are employed by the same local governments that repeatedly hype the fact that smokers subject us to death or grievous bodily harm, no less than a psychopath wielding a chainsaw? When the smoker, oops I mean smoking, ban went into effect in Delaware, the Chief of the Dover Police Department issued a press release telling everyone to NOT call them....they would not respond for a smoking violation unless it involved a criminal event such as assault.
According to my sources the majority of arrests that have been made in Dover (and Delaware in general) regarding smoking ban violations have been of anti-smokers physically attacking smokers.
19 posted on
07/05/2006 11:28:53 AM PDT by
Gabz
(Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
To: Joe 6-pack
What we need are people to start calling 911 every time they see somebody lighting up a cigarette. The police and 911 operators may be annoyed..
You might want to rethink this one - tying up 911 lines will punish not so much the police and 911 operators as it will punish those in need of police and ambulance services. I'd hate to see the death of a heart attack victim on someone's conscience when there might be better ways to deal with the issue.
28 posted on
07/05/2006 12:03:51 PM PDT by
retMD
To: Joe 6-pack
By insisting that second-hand smoke is a killer, how will they react to someone who uses deadly force against a smoker?Interesting question.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson