Posted on 07/04/2006 8:42:50 AM PDT by DouglasKC
What are you thinking?
Species do not breed true; they breed a whole array of variations on a theme, some of which are more survivable. The world is full of examples.
Example: A few thousand years ago a segment of the world's population found itself in a lower-sunlight, more-cold-than-usual environment. Certain traits already present in the sub-population were given a chance to out-breed others. The part of the world's population not subject to those forces had no pressure to adapt in the same way: it may have adapted to something different. Magnify those forces over a thousand generations, and you have evolution.
Self correcting DNA. From Molecular Biology of the Cell
Yes, the copying fidelity of DNA is extraordinary. However copying errors do occur, You and I both have several mutations from our parents, just like every other living thing on earth. At some loci in the human genome there are more than 100 alleles. Yet Adam and Eve had 2 each. Noah's sons and their wives had 2 each (and Noah's sons presumably shared half their genetic material with each other). All other species sequenced have similar genetic variation that cannot have arisen from a single pair c. 5000 years ago. The copying fidelity of DNA does not represent a limit to change, just a limit on the pace of change.
So, how does speciation occur then?
Then you know that only an IDiot trying to fleece superstitious simpletons would even suggest on a public forum that polonium halos can be found in granite!
That's it? Sheesh, at least your brethren actually try to fire back.
Watch the DVD series "Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution" Volumes 1-3.
Which is why you REALLY shouldn't chime in on evo threads....you are clueless! You sound like a fourth grader.
Well, according to creationists, all critters were originally vegetarians, so any ability to shoot bugs from under the water had to have evolved since The Fall, and since this was ~6k years ago, evolution must've happened far quicker than Darwin even thought.
Huh? Are you saying that animals cannot learn from experience?
You're reply made absolutely no sense in light of the post to which you were replying.
"I think I should help out the newbies: Evolution Troll's Toolkit."
Very nice.
George (who took four years of honors geology courses at Montgomery College, and was a docent for two years at the Smithsonian Institutes' Museum of Natural History Naturalist Center)
And, in the same way that our societies change, grow, mutate and die-off, so do individual organisms.
You want "the secret of life" - "the meaning of the universe"...here it is
BE HAPPY
I have personally spoken with God, and he commanded it.
If you think this requires years of study, worship, pennance and sacrifice, you are a fool.
After all, would you want anything less for "your children"?
Geez, you think a REAL caring and compassionate God would have fixed up all of the problems by now....
Like, when I "create" a fish tank, I only populate it with species that won't eat each other. And, if they get a disease, I "heal" them. And, I'm only a stupid human. Your telling me your God can't do better than that??
Pretty piss-poor God if you ask me....
I submit this is how the game of darts evolved, Guinness Stout providing the "refraction".
How would the "first fish" with a grooved mouth structure "know" that it could spew water that way to hit a target insect? As far as I know, no other fish shoots jets of water for any reason, dolphins and whales not being fish. Therefore, the whole evolution precept would seem to fall flat. A "learned skill" would have to be passed down from generation to generation via outright teaching or observation. If another fish that did not have this "grooved mouth structure" had the opportunity to watch and learn, it still could not do the same function............
you posited a way that is not verifiable, so it is no more than an opinion, not science.
______________
An interesting statement. Wouldn't carrying this statement out a bit further suggest that Christianity is "no more than an opinion" (as you say), because it is not verifiable?
"As far as I know, no other fish shoots jets of water for any reason,"
Hmm, slow changes over time to develop a specialty that insures survival. Sounds a lot like.... evolution.
It wouldn't "know." When it happened to be facing in the right direction it would get the extra food.
Um, if God creates nothing that kills, but created man who kills as a result of his free will (which God also created), hasn't God created something that kills.
Or does logic not apply?
And water just happened to come forth out of its mouth for no obvious reason?...................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.