Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Votes to Lift Various Diplomatic Restrictions on Taiwan
tancredo.house.gov ^ | 06/28/2006 | Will Adams

Posted on 07/03/2006 1:34:10 PM PDT by NapkinUser

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO), a member of the House International Relations Committee, was joined by Congressmen Robert Andrews (D-NJ), Steve Chabot (R-OH), and Sherrod Brown (D-OH) in offering an amendment that would lift some restrictions on the U.S.’s diplomatic relations with Taiwan. The amendment passed the House by voice vote this afternoon.

“Lifting these humiliating restrictions will force State Department bureaucrats to treat Taiwan as an equal partner in freedom and democracy,” said Tancredo. “China shouldn’t control our foreign policy, Americans should.”

“The State Department’s ‘Guidelines on Relations with Taiwan’ are an unnecessary roadblock to clear communication between United States officials and their counterparts in Taipei. The removal of these restrictions – which placed strict limitations on how Taiwanese officials were to be addressed, where meetings could take place and what celebrations could be attended – will enable the United States to more effectively communicate and interact with a close friend and one of the strongest Asian democracies,” said Andrews. “In approving this amendment, the House voted for respecting democracy and human rights abroad.”

“We should treat Taiwan like we treat our other allies,” said Chabot. “Let’s do the right thing and scrap these counterproductive guidelines that prevent high level U.S. officials from communicating with their counterparts in Taiwan.”

"Taiwan is a model of economic growth and democracy that should be emulated around the world, but we have senseless guidelines that keep the Taiwanese leadership from coming to the United States. I support today's amendment which would allow U.S. officials to communicate with representatives of Taiwan's democratically elected government,” said Brown.

The amendment to the Science, State, Justice, Commerce Appropriations Bill would roll back a State Department memo which sets several arbitrary restrictions on communication between Taiwan and the U.S. The restrictions include:

1. Meetings between executive branch personnel and Taiwan representatives may not occur in the State Department buildings, the White House, or the Old Executive Office Building.
2. Executive branch personnel from the foreign affairs agencies (CIA, DOD, White House, State, and NSC), nor any other executive branch employee above the rank of GS-14 may attend the annual October 10 reception in Washington hosted by Taiwan’s mission in the U.S. commemorating the founding of the Republic of China (Taiwan’s official national name)
3. Executive branch personnel are not permitted to attend functions at the Twin Oaks estate in Washington.
4. Officials from the DOD and State above the rank of office director or the rank of Colonel or Navy Captain may not travel to Taiwan on “official business.” Executive branch officials at or above Assistant Secretary (State) or Three Star flag officers (Military) may not travel to Taiwan for personal travel without advance clearance from State. All travel must be on “tourist” rather than “official” passports.
5. Executive branch personnel may not officially correspond through the mail directly with Taiwan officials unless their correspondence is first sent the American Institute in Taiwan (our ‘unofficial embassy’). And any such correspondence may not be on letterhead, nor may it contain the official title of the author. Personal correspondence between executive branch personnel and Taiwan officials (like thank you notes) are subject to the same restrictions.
6. Executive branch officials are not permitted to refer to Taiwan by its official name “Republic of China”, nor can they refer to Taiwan’s government as a “government.” Instead, the term “Taiwan Authorities” must be used. It also prevents Executive branch personnel from referring to the people who live in Taiwan as “Taiwanese” – instead, it requires them to refer to these people as “people on Taiwan.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: congress; freetaiwan; good; taiwan; tancredo; upyourschina

1 posted on 07/03/2006 1:34:14 PM PDT by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Wow! Tancredo actually doing something constructive! I may have to take back some things I've said...


2 posted on 07/03/2006 1:37:21 PM PDT by loreldan (Without coffee I am nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Good for Tancredo. China could make N. Korea fall in line any time they choose to. Why give them any say-so in our choice of diplomatic relations?


3 posted on 07/03/2006 1:37:47 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (The Left hates America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Now if Tancredo could follow up with some legislation mandating that real, live, loyal and patriotic AMERICANS be the only individuals permitted to work at the State Department, he might start getting somewhere.

But this is a good start.

The State Department, the place where America's Enemies always feel welcome when they can't make it to the U.N.


4 posted on 07/03/2006 1:39:15 PM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Aren't there Manchurians in Manchuria? Why exactly did the government switch recognition of China from the Taipei administration to the Beijing one? Mainland China was not as developed as today.


5 posted on 07/03/2006 1:41:22 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
It's about time. We seem to kiss the Saudi's asses and treat real friends like crap. I recently got back from Taiwan and the Taiwanese people treated me and the rest of us Americans that went down there, like royalty. I'm telling you that they love Americans down there. I felt almost guilty while there because of our unfair regulations against them. The Commies are our enemies, Taiwan is our ally.
6 posted on 07/03/2006 1:44:18 PM PDT by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Bttt!


7 posted on 07/03/2006 1:55:22 PM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

The foreign policy of liberalism is to treat our friends like enemies, neutrals like friends, and enemies like neutrals.

There is no reason that we should favor the communist Chinese regime (undemocratic, dangerous to its neighbors, and promoting the worst regimes they can find, such as those of Chavez, Castro, Mugabe, Kim Jung Il, Ahmonajihad), over the legitimate, democratic, peaceful government on Taiwan.


8 posted on 07/03/2006 2:06:59 PM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

This is well done by Congressman Tancredo.


9 posted on 07/03/2006 3:03:29 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

IIRC, recognition was extended to Beijing as a substitute for Taipei in order to subvert a perceived axis between Beijing and Moscow during the Cold War. It was supposed that this would befriend the communist Chinese and win their help at the Paris Peace Talks, so that they might assist us in bringing the North Vietnamese to the table and get them to deal.

In fact, it was one of the more cowardly and despicable acts of the realpolitik that characterized the Kissinger regime of the Nixon administration; however, it was widely hailed at the time as a sage policy which might serve to throw a monkey wrench into the communist works. It was also hailed by countless comsymps as overdue recognition of Beijing's "right" to rule the entire Middle Kingdom and all Chinese formerly governed by the emperor and the Chinese Republicans.


10 posted on 07/03/2006 3:19:36 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster


11 posted on 07/03/2006 3:27:58 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson