Posted on 07/03/2006 7:37:02 AM PDT by veronica
How about "Quis" Sulzberger instead of Pinch?
Why not publish pictures of the residences of NYTimes Board of Directors members: Brenda C. Barnes, Raul E. Cesan, Lynn G. Dolnick, Michael Golden, William F. Kennard, Janet L. Robinson and Thomas Middlehoff. I'm sure they will enjoy the publicity.
Unbelievable treachery!!!
The gloves are coming off against The Treason Times.
Pray for W and Our Troops
This is a scathing article, spot on and unfettered. Needs to be bumped frequently.
How about Pinch Laval... give a little French-stench to it.
So crush it already, I'm all for it.
Pinch Sulzberger is a marxist.In an earlier time he'd be arrested and charged with treason.I get the impression he feels he's untouchable.Megalomaniac?
Perhaps it is also time to give up imprecatory prayers for these "children of Belial."
This is outright traitorous. Publishing detailed information about the location and movement of our executive leaders during a time of war should set at the very least set the Secret Service into motion. There has got to be some type of law about this. This paper needs to be shut down in the name of national security.
At the very least, Rumsfeld and Cheney should file a civil lawsuit against the times for endangering their families.
I'm thinking of Robespierre, Trotsky and a whole lot of others: If Sulzberger actually lived in a Marxist society, he's find himself hanging from a lampost in short order.
When you see those photographs of him you begin to understand why the New York Times has become the country's premier homosexual newspaper.
Maybe they should rename it the Village Voice. Oh, that name's already taken.
This was done on purpose and land or water entry makes it more difficult for protection. The NY Times is looking pretty ugly these days. The readers of the NY Times have to decide how they feel about this matter. The advertising customers should be boycotted and told why. A list of NY Times ads on the net and a massive email effort may help.
There is only one reason the treacherous nyt would publish security information on the VP Cheney's house and that is to give information to would be terrorists. The nyt really is an Al Quaeda operative. JessM
You are right. The thing that will hurt the N.Y. Times most is to get to their advertisers. If the advertisers are boycotted and told why, they will think again about where their advertising dollars should be spent.
Here you go. Link by Sweetness & Light
Yet, if someone published on the web pictures of all the doors and security chcekpoints for the NYT Building, "Putz" Sulzberger would go nuts.
Sulzberger:"He'd find himself hanging from a lampost in short order."Either that or slowly worked to death in a gulag.Classic marxist m.o.-eliminate trouble makers.
What were his SAT scores?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.