Skip to comments.
Copycatty Coulter Pilfers Prose: Pro
NY Post ^
| July 2, 2006
| PHILIP RECCHIA
Posted on 07/02/2006 5:26:36 AM PDT by publius1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
I take it that this means she is a bad mad unbelievable person whose main points about anything should never be believed and no one should buy her books and ... and ... and...
Wait--she lifted something from Planned Parenthood?... in her argument on abortion?...
I need to think about this. Coulter, anti-abortion, plagarized something from Planned Parenthood, abortion-advocate and abortion mill...
Ok, I've thought about it: What tripe!
1
posted on
07/02/2006 5:26:37 AM PDT
by
publius1
To: publius1
Coulter did not respond to requests for comment. And she would be wise not to dignify this drivel with a reply.
2
posted on
07/02/2006 5:29:58 AM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: publius1
How can one plagarize their own work?
3
posted on
07/02/2006 5:30:07 AM PDT
by
synbad600
To: publius1
Ah yes, the politics of personal destruction. I can't wait to hear what's in her trash can too. Here's the writer of this hit piece: philip.recchia@nypost.com
4
posted on
07/02/2006 5:30:36 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: publius1
Quotes are not plagiarism.... Duuugh...
5
posted on
07/02/2006 5:32:34 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
To: synbad600
"How can one plagarize their own work?"
I dunno, but the story gets Coulter and plagarize in the same sentence. Thats probably all they really wanted.
To: publius1
"...one 25-word passage from the "Godless" chapter titled "The Holiest Sacrament: Abortion" appears to have been lifted nearly word for word from Planned Parenthood literature..." Yeah, I'm sure Ann needs Planned Parenthood as a major source of her materials. /sarc
More like Ann poked Planned Parentthood in the eye with their own quotes.
7
posted on
07/02/2006 5:33:58 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
(Stop the Nifongery!)
To: publius1
Everyday you can pick up stories from one MSM source and see nearly identical pieces in many other sources.
To: publius1
The Post that one 25-word passage from the "Godless" chapter titled "The Holiest Sacrament: Abortion" appears to have been lifted nearly word for word from Planned Parenthood literature published at least 18 months before Coulter's 281-page book was released. ROTFLMAO!!!!
Rock On, Annie!!!
9
posted on
07/02/2006 5:36:37 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: publius1
John Barrie, the creator of a leading plagiarism-recognition system, claimed he found at least three instances of what he calls "textbook plagiarism" in the leggy blond pundit's "Godless: the Church of Liberalism"Hey Mr. Barrie, tell this to Joe Biden!!
The liberal Modernist quote should read: "Truthless, The Creed of Liberlism."
10
posted on
07/02/2006 5:36:50 AM PDT
by
sirchtruth
(No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
To: publius1
When she is writing word for word what the liberals are saying or have written...that is not plagiarism. The liberals are really upset aren't they? Three cheers for Ann!
11
posted on
07/02/2006 5:37:08 AM PDT
by
Dudoight
To: publius1
Wow.
3 passages of perhaps 60 words in a row. (broken into 3 sections).
BURN HER AT THE STAKE! (Liberal/Jihadi response)
12
posted on
07/02/2006 5:37:26 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(Bullshit doesn't get bridges built.)
To: synbad600
the headline is the important part for the left... throw out an accusation in the headline and hope that no one reads the article
13
posted on
07/02/2006 5:42:03 AM PDT
by
InvisibleChurch
(No.... wire .... hangers!)
To: Dudoight
When she is writing word for word what the liberals are saying or have written...that is not plagiarism. Actually, if it's without attribution then it is plagiarism. I'm sure I'm in the minority on this one, but when you write an attack book you should be extra careful not to leave yourself open to criticism. Plagiarism would be one obvious check.
Not that this changes the overall truth of her book. But if the article is accurate, it leaves her open to charges of hypocrisy.
To: publius1
She didn't use 'smart' quotes.
15
posted on
07/02/2006 5:46:13 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: publius1
Does anyone know what the sentences are?
John just plagraized Ann Couter's work by quoting from her book to illustrate his point. Gasp! How devilish of him.
17
posted on
07/02/2006 5:46:46 AM PDT
by
4rcane
To: InvisibleChurch
the headline is the important part for the left... throw out an accusation in the headline and hope that no one reads the article I was told by someone who worked for a newspaper that that was how most folks read a paper: they read the headlines and maybe a paragraph ot two of the actual article. The longer it is, the less most actually read.
So there's a reason they write them that way.
18
posted on
07/02/2006 5:48:09 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: publius1
If you steal from one it's plagiarism. If you steal from several it's research.
To: NittanyLion
Hmmmmm, I am sure you are not the first to write or call Ann's book an "attack book".......
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson