Hysterical God-haters, many of them.
The real questions are: What other decorations are in that building, what is the procedure for decorating, who is responsible for decorating, and what are the guidelines for decorating?
If there are other types of decorations there, what is wrong with one of them having a religious theme? Is religious expression not permitted while other varieties of expression is permitted?
If so, then that is viewpoint discrimination
INTREP
Maybe they are actually standing for the Ten Commandments!
Something about "Thou shalt not make...a graven image?"
I think the school should make the ACLU prove it is a picture of Christ or a symbol of. Impossible when you think about it. Case dismissed in a perfect world.
Why don't they just leave it up but call it a portrait of "Bill" or "Joe", or anyone not so damn offensive?
The only way to stop this is to seperate state from schools and the way is vouchers. No one thought anything about government funded schools until over decades the leftists changed the law under the USSC and many people do not understand the slippery slope that started. People need to know the history of how the upside down world happened to put a stop to it.
It is not a portrait of Christ. Just a represenative of christian organizations.<p.
ACLU prove otherwise as it is impossible.
God Bless Ann Coulter.. she called them right.
Godless ones
More people need to wake up and realize that this isn't a movement to stand up to religious zealots. These groups are on a mission to destroy God and the fabric of our society.
(The Palestinian terrorist regime is the crisis and Israel's fist is the answer.)
I particularly don't care for any photo of Jesus because personally I believe in the commandment that "thou shalt not make any graven images." And no one knows what Jesus looked like. However, the pic's been on the wall for 30 years and the school administration doesn't care so why should the ACLU & the other communist-run org care? Just another way for these two to butt in where they're not wanted.
This nonsense is so tiresome. Just like we can't call it "B.C." and "A.D." anymore, it's "B.C.E." and "C.E." before common era and common era. What was the historical event that marked the start of the "common era" and the end of the "before common era"...?
But it's not that they're trying to stomp out Christianity, right?
Let 'em f**king sue. Too many school districts and local governments are just rolling over for these a-holes, and I'm sick to death of it.
Time to sue THEM out of existence.
Given the recent attacks upon Christianity the questions arise: what can the Christian do to defend his belief? Should he defend his belief? Why do non-Christians have the "right" to define the rules? Will Christians be happy in their approaching position of inferiority? (Rules are made by superiors for inferiors.
Did I miss something? This IS a public school, right?
So, put up pictures of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan alongside Jesus, name the gallery "Great Men of Vision", and then watch the ACLU's heads explode.