Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Only 483 Guard Working on Mexican Border
Breitbart & AP ^ | Jun 30 2006 | By AARON C. DAVIS

Posted on 06/30/2006 7:15:57 PM PDT by EternalVigilance

Only 483 Guard Working on Mexican Border
Jun 30 9:35 PM US/Eastern

By AARON C. DAVIS

Associated Press Writer

SACRAMENTO, Calif.

On the deadline to have 2,500 troops along the Mexican border, the National Guard said Friday that only 483 were in position and working with the U.S. Border Patrol as the Bush administration had directed.

But Guard officials said more than 2,000 others were somewhere inside the four southwestern border states, training or helping plan the deployment. He and Bush administration officials argued Friday that the presence of troops in those states spelled success in the first stage of the mission.

Lt. Gen. H. Steven Blum, chief of the National Guard Bureau, an arm of the Pentagon, had promised June 1 that by the end of the month 2,500 Guard troops would be working "on the border."

"As defined by the operation, the National Guard has met and exceeded its goal of deploying 2,500 soldiers and airmen to the four Southwest border states," said White House spokesman Blain Rethmeier. "Progress to date is real and the Guard's efforts are making a positive difference in this national effort."

As evidence, he said the early arrival of troops had allowed the Border Patrol to send 125 agents "back to the front lines," and helped the Border Patrol catch nearly 200 illegal immigrants, seize 123 pounds of marijuana, 18 pounds of cocaine and seven vehicles.

Through initial pay requests filed with the Air Guard and orders filed with the Army Guard, the Guard bureau verified 2,547 troops were in the four border states for the mission, said Daniel Donohue, a spokesman for the National Guard Bureau.

Only 483 were physically on the border, he conceded.

The remaining forces _ 1,816 _ are in training somewhere in the four states; 248 are assigned to headquarters and planning roles, Donohue said.

Asked to clarify, Blum spokesman Mark Allen responded by e-mail that the general had never specifically promised to deliver troops to a "geographically defined latitude and longitude."

Still, there were signs the deployment was picking up speed.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry said 1,000 Army and Air National Guardsmen were either on the border or "on their way," adding 500 to totals released Thursday. But his office said the additional troops didn't actually reach the border, but were considered deployed when they left Friday for two weeks of training.

Several states whose Guard leaders and governors had been contacted by the National Guard Bureau in the last 48 hours also made announcements Friday that they would send troops.

Gov. Mike Easley of North Carolina said he would reluctantly deploy 300 troops to the border in mid-July.

"I would prefer not to have any of the North Carolina National Guard deployed to other states at this time," he said. "However, the Guard units in the western states are spread thin as they battle raging wildfires. We must all step up and do our part to keep our country safe."

Kentucky announced it would send up to 650 National Guard troops. Arkansas also said it would send 200. New Jersey also said it would send up to 650 for three-week assignments.

Damon Foreman, senior patrol agent and spokesman for the Border Patrol in San Diego, said agents there eagerly await the Guard's help.

"We would welcome all the help we could get. We could absorb them as fast as we could give them instructions on what to do," Foreman said, adding that the delayed deployment, however, had not affected operations.

"We've been doing a considerably effective job for a long time now, we'll keep doing our job whether the whole number of Guard show up tomorrow, a week from tomorrow, or a month from now."

Bush's plan for stemming illegal immigration by using National Guardsmen in a support role called for 2,500 troops to be on the border by June 30, and 6,000 by the end of July.

Bush had said the mission would free up thousands of officers now on other duties to actively patrol the border. Guardsmen are expected to build fences, conduct routine surveillance and take care of other administrative duties for the border patrol.


Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; borderpatrol; borders; culture; illegalaliens; illegals; immigration; language; mexicans; mexico; nationalguard; wetbacks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-213 next last
To: Old_Mil
Since 9/11, a hundred thousand new legal Muslim immigrants a year have come to America - while grandmothers are frisked at midwestern airports. You might consider this "protecting the nation just fine," but I do not.

Bush is not a xenophobe, as you appear to be. No one is forced to fly, so a bit of inconvenience at the airport is just part of the process.

161 posted on 07/01/2006 7:42:05 AM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
One of my 2 closest friends, Juan hernandez, has a 15 year old daughter, who was brutally raped, and beaten. Juan had just saved up enough money to send her to a private school for gifted children. Now she sits in her bedroom, watching TV ad nauseum, too afraid to even go to her best friends house. The illegal who did it was expelled from the country 3 FRIGGIN TIMES before he did this!

Juan is just going to have to understand that this is the cost of keeping the flow of cheap labor intact so that we can be competitive on the world stage. /sarc
162 posted on 07/01/2006 7:42:56 AM PDT by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

I am looking forward to a political bloodbath in November when these pro illegal whores in DC get their walking papers.


163 posted on 07/01/2006 7:45:58 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (If you got Sowell, you got Soul !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Bush is not a xenophobe, as you appear to be.

A xenophobe? No. An Islamophobe? Yes, and with good reason.
164 posted on 07/01/2006 7:47:06 AM PDT by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
I am looking forward to a political bloodbath in November when these pro illegal whores in DC get their walking papers.

Like who? The Senate is safe, and, the more the Democrats hang themselves in the area of national security, the more it appears that the House will remain in GOP hands as well.

Immigration will not be the decisive factor in the election, as you hope it will. National security and Iraq will be, as it was in 2004.

165 posted on 07/01/2006 7:47:56 AM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

You keep splitting the National Security from illegal immigration, just like Bush does. This is not intelligent.


166 posted on 07/01/2006 7:50:54 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (If you got Sowell, you got Soul !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
[ Nah. I'd rather respond to your extremist nonsense. ]

Ugh Oh.. A democrat cliche snuk out..
i.e. what exactly is wrong with being an extremeist?..

167 posted on 07/01/2006 7:55:29 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
You keep splitting the National Security from illegal immigration, just like Bush does.

As the vast majority of voters do.

You, OTOH, have to link National Security to immigration to get any traction.

Immigration is a separate issue to voters. And immigration is nowhere near as important an issue, to voters, as national security.

168 posted on 07/01/2006 7:57:30 AM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

We shall see who is right in November.


169 posted on 07/01/2006 8:06:07 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (If you got Sowell, you got Soul !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: soccer_maniac
Good morning.
"We have no problems securing the Afghanistan and Iraq borders"

Maybe you meant that we have no problem making the effort to secure the borders of Afghanistan and Iraq?

If they are secure, lets bring a bunch of our troops home and secure our own border(s).

Michael Frazier
170 posted on 07/01/2006 8:11:23 AM PDT by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
Good morning.
"It's a U.N. shade of blue."

Maybe it's Infantry blue even though these are more than likely Engineers.

Michael Frazier
171 posted on 07/01/2006 8:18:45 AM PDT by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; sinkspur

Beautiful post.

And sinkspur's response???.......



*crickets*


172 posted on 07/01/2006 8:22:24 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (The Left created, embraces and feeds "The Culture of Hate." Make it part of the political lexicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: brazzaville

Good morning!

I had never seen our troops sporting hard hats before, nor blue ones.

They resemble the U.N. "blue helmets," although as EV rightly pointed out, they're hard hats, appropriate for Engineers.

Would like to know more about this.

BTW, "The War Tapes" opened in San Francisco yesterday. Don't know when it will come to L.A.


173 posted on 07/01/2006 8:42:12 AM PDT by La Enchiladita (God Bless Our Troops...including U.S. Border Patrol, America's First Line of Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Good morning.
"Do people pay you for your obtuseness and snide ignorant remarks?"

People pay Howard Dean and Al Franken, so it's possible.

Michael Frazier
174 posted on 07/01/2006 8:43:10 AM PDT by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: brazzaville

Good morning : )


175 posted on 07/01/2006 8:45:23 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (If you got Sowell, you got Soul !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003; stephenjohnbanker; brazzaville; sinkspur
Any "dialogue" with aptly named sinkspur is guaranteed to become a quagmire.
176 posted on 07/01/2006 8:57:04 AM PDT by La Enchiladita (God Bless Our Troops...including U.S. Border Patrol, America's First Line of Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

National Guard: Doing The Job That American Presidents Don't Want To Do.


177 posted on 07/01/2006 9:01:55 AM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Good morning.
"I am looking forward to a political bloodbath in November when these pro illegal whores in DC get their walking papers."

This has been a fun thread, but it is becoming less so.

So you are looking forward to the Republicans losing power in November? Who's going to replace them, FRiend, and what do you think the replacement is going to do?

If the Republicans lose control of Congress, the DemocRATs will win it. That is reality. If the DemocRATS win, Nancy Pelosi will likely be Speaker of the house and I don't even want to think about who would lead a DemocRAT controlled Senate.

So, patriot, what do you want?

Michael Frazier
178 posted on 07/01/2006 9:08:32 AM PDT by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
By definition a politician is-among other things-a liar. They cannot help it. Untruth is their very essence, their very being. Lying is an outward manifestation of their inner nature. Politicians are the last great metaphysical problem the West will ever face.
179 posted on 07/01/2006 9:15:23 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Bush is NOT serious about border control. He never has been. The country is about to be destroyed because of illegal immigration, and he could care less! It's HIS 'OPINION' that it's good for us, in spite of what WE THE PEOPLE want. By the time he realizes down the line just how stupid amnesty was, it will be too late and we will be a clone of Mexico!!
180 posted on 07/01/2006 9:15:45 AM PDT by NRA2BFree (NEVER ARGUE WITH IDIOTS!!! THEY*LL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL AND BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-213 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson