[Nateman]

She might as well add a few chapters about how the "Central sun theory" or "Round earth" theory are bogus. She brilliantly slams the left then becomes a fool by blasting evolution. I'm just as surprised as she is that the left is not taking her on over this. I'm embarrassed to have her on my side because of it.

[papertyger]

She brilliantly slams the left then becomes a fool by blasting evolution.

Do you understand what she meant by "being condescended to by a tarot card reader?"

[TomSmedley]

She might as well add a few chapters about how the "Central sun theory" or "Round earth" theory are bogus. She brilliantly slams the left then becomes a fool by blasting evolution

You are not embarassed by the behavior of such consistent evolutionists as Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Sanger? You do not see the connections between their thoughts and their actions? You wish to hallow the thought behind the actions, while disavowing the consequences?

[RaceBannon]

No, Nate, only a fool defends evolution.

[LS]

I thought it was a brilliant expose of Darwinism and evolution. Wonderful.

[trebb]

She might as well add a few chapters about how the "Central sun theory" or "Round earth" theory are bogus. She brilliantly slams the left then becomes a fool by blasting evolution. I'm just as surprised as she is that the left is not taking her on over this. I'm embarrassed to have her on my side because of i

The statement goes a long way towards proving her point on how the Evos are so quick to "Bork" any information that doesn't fit thier belief system...

[saleman]

Real open-minded there. I'm at least willing to look at other opinions on creation. One thing I've never understood. What does it really matter? As an object of debate, maybe. But what point does the debate serve?Why are we here? How was the universe formed? The same "meaning of life" question. My answer: It just is. Simplistic as hell, I know. I'm a simple kind of guy. I've got bills to pay, job to get to, friends and family to love, places to go and things to do. This debate is not a debate at all. Just a bunch of people namecalling and preaching. So all you intellectual types keep it up. It seems like a huge waste of time and energy to me.

[ozzymandus]

I don't think Ann is on your side.

[RobRoy]

I am sure there are others that feel the same way about chapters about "them".

Methinks thou doth protest too much.

Apparently you are one of the "spanked by Ann".

[mathluv]

Have you read what she said about evolution, or do you just support it regardless?

[GreenOgre]

She's brilliant, but when she treads on evolution she is clueless. There is not one shred of proof supporting ID. Not one shred.

The "This couldn't of happened without a Supreme Being's influence." argument is superstition at it's highest.

When you find bear, lion, or any other modern animal fossils mixed in with dinosaur bones let me know.

Since you can't do that, try showing me the mechanism the Supreme Being uses to direct EVOLUTION through the documented changes in species over thousands and millions of years. There is no such mechanism stated in ID theory. Therefore we are back to superstition. Just like every civilization has a diety(s) and a creation story, a moral code, and an end of times story.

[Mom MD]

We all have our straw men we are unwilling to give up. You love her until she lampoons something you hold sacred. Unfortunately, there is a growing body of sound scientific evidence to support her side as well. (I know, I'm about to be tarred and feathered, it has happened before.)
Just pointing out your inconsistency.