Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Says Muzzleloaders are Legally Firearms
Al P ^ | 6/28/06 | staff

Posted on 06/29/2006 10:22:18 AM PDT by Redcloak

Supreme Court Says Muzzleloaders are Legally Firearms
Cheyenne- Posted 6/28/06
Associated Press

The ruling comes in an appeal by a convicted felon who says he thought he was allowed to own a black powder rifle. Such rifles are excluded from the federal definition of firearms.

A spokesman for the Wyoming Game and Fish Department says the ruling will come as a blow to some Wyoming residents who have felony convictions in the past but who are now dedicated black powder hunters.

Governor Freudenthal says he would favor changing the state law to allow convicted felons to continue to hunt with black powder guns.

The court ruling released Wednesday upholds the conviction of Frank Alan Harris in a Casper court on a charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm.

According to the court ruling, Harris was previously convicted of aggravated robbery and robbery.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; blackpowder; felons; firearms; ruling; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
To: Redcloak

Name another right they lose.
Name another Bill Of Rights right they lose.


41 posted on 06/29/2006 12:00:17 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

civil rights are not Constitutionally protected.


42 posted on 06/29/2006 12:05:11 PM PDT by SFC Chromey (We are at war with Islamofascism, now ACT LIKE IT, PRESIDENT BUSH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
They can't serve in elective office. IIRC, their 4th Amendment rights are also impaired; the police can search their persons and property more easily than would otherwise be the case. They can lose their freedom to travel as well as their freedom of association. (i.e. a paroled gangbanger can be told not to "hang wid his homies" and would have to ask permission to visit his dying mom in another state.)

The felonious act is a serious breach of the individual's relationship to the rest of society. Spending a little time getting his three hots and a cot doesn't repair that breach.

43 posted on 06/29/2006 12:09:56 PM PDT by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
How many gang-bangers are packing Springfield muskets?

I'm sure the British Regulars considered the Massachussets Militia to be not much more than "Gang-bangers". ;)

44 posted on 06/29/2006 12:22:44 PM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Felons lose some of their civil rights ...

I know. I don't think the practice is just.

45 posted on 06/29/2006 12:41:50 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
You can order old (Model 1896)Mauser rifles in working condition through the mail, no permit required, so I believe the 100-year rule applies at least to rifles.

Until 1968 you could order any shotgun, rifle or pistol through the mail...

46 posted on 06/29/2006 12:46:02 PM PDT by Max in Utah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
The trick will be FINDING a 1911 over 100 years old, functional, and not being so valuable as to preclude reasonable use.

why would anyone want to own a gun that they wouldn't or couldn't use?
47 posted on 06/29/2006 1:31:51 PM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: flying Elvis

That and needing to purchase from an FFL or go through one if you buy one on the internet.


48 posted on 06/29/2006 2:02:57 PM PDT by looscnnn ("Olestra (Olean) applications causes memory leaks" PC Confusious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

No free man shall be debarred the use of arms.


49 posted on 06/29/2006 2:03:54 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Migraine
It would avoid a lot of hassle if they'd simply amend the law concerning felons and not the laws about firearms. I think many states simply prohibit felons from possessing deadly weapons.

A feel-good and immoral law.

50 posted on 06/29/2006 2:05:50 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bang_list

Ping


51 posted on 06/29/2006 2:08:58 PM PDT by Vision ("America's best days lie ahead. You ain't seen nothing yet"- Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

I wonder if you will no longer be able to mail order blackpower weapons without going through and FFL?


52 posted on 06/29/2006 2:11:13 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog
I don't think we do that here in Californistan, SSR. I can't imagine a sensible State like Wyoming having such a requirement!
53 posted on 06/29/2006 2:16:41 PM PDT by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Burro Driver
Man I wish that were the case. That woud include the -03 Springfield...and...

Sweet Jesus, Ma-Duece!


54 posted on 06/29/2006 2:17:52 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Felons can get illegal guns anytime they want!

It is a myth that the law regulating ( planned evolution toward prohibition) firearms purchases prohibits felons from having firearms. At best , it just makes it more expensive for them to get a firearm.

Meanwhile the rest of us will have to use archery as a defense tool.

I am working on my spear technique as we speak, and have started accumulating swords.

55 posted on 06/29/2006 2:24:40 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
It is a myth that the law regulating... firearms purchases prohibits felons from having firearms.

I don't think that anyone here has made that argument. The only practical use these laws have is to provide an excuse to lock up a felon when he's caught with a gun. The question at hand is: "Should these felons be locked up?"

56 posted on 06/29/2006 2:30:10 PM PDT by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
why would anyone want to own a gun that they wouldn't or couldn't use?

For the historical value. I'd love to have a Martini-Henry rifle from the time of the Zulu Wars. Who knows, it might even be one which saw action at the Battle of Rourke's Drift.

Heck, I'd like to have one of every military small arm used in the past 250 years, working or not.

57 posted on 06/29/2006 2:42:39 PM PDT by Max in Utah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
I definitely don't want the damn Feds having anything to do with muzzle loaders, or any other guns for that matter. I do think that States should be allowed to deny or permit weaponry to convicted felons as they see fit.

My preference would be to forbid them any modern firearms ever, except in the rarest and most worthy cases. Muzzle loaders ought to be permitted after they have served their time and then successfully completed a period of five to seven years without any further run-ins with the law.

This would be fair to minor felons in rural states, most of whom would find it an incentive to stay on the straight and narrow. The gang-bangers would never bother with muzzle loaders, and would be treated even more harshly when they are inevitably convicted for felon-in-posession the next time.

-ccm

58 posted on 06/29/2006 2:59:57 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

One nice thing about muzzleloaders being exempt from federal law is that hobbyists can (and do) make their own from scratch. Muzzleloading cannons fit into the same classification and I've built three (my favorite was turned from 1-5/8" ID x 3-1/4" OD steel machine tubing and it's gotten regular Independence Day usage - with a tomato paste can of black powder). My biggest bore is a mortar that will shoot a 12" long x 9" diameter log to good effect.


59 posted on 06/29/2006 3:06:23 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
If someone is that dang dangerous to "society", then just friggin' keep 'em locked up or EXECUTE them. Once the debt is paid, let 'em get on with life.

Amen. It smacks of the "3/5ths of a citizen" notion to deprive rights from someone who has presumably fulfilled their sentence for breaking the law. Those old notions of subservience to the state/king are hard to shake. The Revolution, Civil War and the Civil Rights Act just haven't quite purified those old-world ideas from our government.

60 posted on 06/29/2006 3:12:03 PM PDT by TigersEye (They hang traitors don't they?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson