Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2006 6:39:41 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AZ_Cowboy; perfect stranger

Where are you guys tonight?????


2 posted on 06/28/2006 6:40:16 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan
When is the New York Times going to get around to uncovering an al-Qaida secret program?

All kidding aside, that kinda says it all, doesn't it?

3 posted on 06/28/2006 6:42:08 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan

Iva Toguri D'Aquino ("Tokyo Rose") is actually still alive.


4 posted on 06/28/2006 6:45:05 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan

She's having fun being serious.


5 posted on 06/28/2006 6:46:36 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan
"In response, the Bush administration is sounding very cross – and doing nothing. Bush wouldn't want to get the press mad at him! Yeah, let's keep the media on our good side like they are now. Otherwise, they might do something crazy – like leak a classified government program monitoring terrorist financing."

I've been saying this for weeks.

I think I know what "W" stands for.

This is the RNC monolith:


8 posted on 06/28/2006 7:05:20 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan
In response, the Bush administration is sounding very cross – and doing nothing.

In response, the Bush Administration should be enforcing this:

18 U.S.C. §798. Disclosure of Classified Information. (a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information— (1) concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government; or (2) concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, or appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or (3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or (4) obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes—Shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. (b) As used in this subsection (a) of this section— The term “classified information” means information which, at the time of a violation of this section, is, for reasons of national security, specifically designated by a United States Government Agency for limited or restricted dissemination or distribution; ......... The term “communication intelligence” means all procedures and methods used in the interception of communications and the obtaining of information from such communications by other than the intended recipients; The term “unauthorized person” means any person who, or agency which, is not authorized to receive information of the categories set forth in subsection (a) of this section, by the President, or by the head of a department or agency of the United States Government which is expressly designated by the President to engage in communication intelligence activities for the United States.

9 posted on 06/28/2006 7:10:09 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan
Don't get me wrong: Rep. Peter King is nuttier than squirrel droppings

ROFL

10 posted on 06/28/2006 7:11:40 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (What you know about that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan

The failure of the administration to punish the Times and others for treason is not just weak, it is a violation of the President's oath of office, to defend this country and enforce its laws.

People in positions of responsibility like President Bush do not have the luxury of shrugging their shoulders and letting things go. It is their duty to enforce the rule of law and to defend our country against deadly enemies, foreign and domestic.

By letting treason go unpunished, after a certain point President Bush becomes complicit in it. That point has long passed. If he had taken the Times to court the first time they committed treason, they might not have done it a second time, and a third time. They might not intend to do it again, the next time they get a chance.


11 posted on 06/28/2006 7:22:16 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan
Indexing RELATED threads:
12 down: Top secret war plans, 36 across: Treason
  Posted by Rummyfan
On News/Activism 06/28/2006 6:39:38 PM PDT · 15 replies · 571+ views


World Net Daily ^ | 28 June 2006 | Ann Coulter
 

Coulter: N.Y. Times Committed 'Treason'
  Posted by wagglebee
On News/Activism 06/28/2006 4:45:03 PM PDT · 68 replies · 1,994+ views


NewsMax ^ | 6/29/06 | Phil Brennan
 

17 posted on 06/28/2006 9:38:37 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan

"What if, instead of passing information from the government's secret nuclear program at Los Alamos directly to Soviet agents, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg had printed those same secrets in a newsletter?"

If the Right continues to bend over and take it from these SOBs, they will continue to screw us. If America continues to let them get away with treason, they will continue to commit it.


18 posted on 06/28/2006 10:23:58 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan
NYT is treasonous?

Rather than let lawyers screw this up, here's a better executive order. It doesn't have to even be "ordered" by the President's lips. Just a shake of the head from several WH staff members and Pentagon brass would start a useful trend.

The POTUS can tell everyone in his branch to not use tax payer's money to purchase the NYT. Beyond just barring NYT reporters and canceling subscriptions to the White House, order that no military post exchange will carry the NYT. If a fed needs to know what traitors are publishing, let the funds to buy NYT come from the FBI budget used to find and track spies and turn coats.

Furthermore, the NYT shouldn't be displayed or even donated to a military library, doctor, or dentist's office. Yes, a military commanding officer can issue such orders since this rag of a newspaper is a weapon against the lives of their subordinates and their families.

Even better, other news agencies that choose to defend the nation that defends their right to life and free press CAN STOP USING THE NEW YORK TIMES AS A LITMUS TO NEWSWORTHY STORIES. That's right media folk, drop the NYT subscription and do what other American's do: get on-line, check several sources, block the extreme and obvious anti-American trash (and there are more publications than the NYT that are treacherous).

If there's still an interest in such publications like the NYT beyond it's own treasonous crowd, then it can be considered a "Barf Alert!" hobby...not just for a quick laugh, but because we can all use a good splash of cold water in the face that reminds us that the devil can exist in the hearts of mankind.
19 posted on 06/28/2006 10:50:16 PM PDT by SaltyJoe (A mother's sorrowful heart and personal sacrifice redeems her lost child's soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan

The best line is the first one - "When is the New York Times going to get around to uncovering an al-Qaida secret program?"

Bingo! Why aren't our "brave" journalists tracking Osama Bin laden or uncovering terrorist plots? All these a--holes do is blow the whistle on the US government. How hard is that?


23 posted on 06/29/2006 9:21:19 PM PDT by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan
Good golly, she's right. And bold enough to say it all. God bless her.
24 posted on 06/29/2006 9:33:36 PM PDT by AnnaZ (I think so, Brain, but if we give peas a chance, won't the lima beans feel left out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan
[ And the greatest threat at home isn't traitorous liberals – it's patriotic Americans, also known as "Republicans," tut-tutting the quaint idea that we should take treason seriously. ]

Exactly..

25 posted on 06/29/2006 9:52:25 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rummyfan

Damn, this is one of the greatest columns she`s ever written, I can`t stop reading it!

"In response, the Bush administration is sounding very cross — and doing nothing. Bush wouldn't want to get the press mad at him! Yeah, let's keep the media on our good side like they are now. Otherwise, they might do something crazy — like leak a classified government program monitoring terrorist financing."

lol freggin` awesome!


27 posted on 07/02/2006 12:37:25 AM PDT by Screamname (Support PETOV... People for the ethical treatment of vegetables...Let us end the carnage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson