Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eisenhower's 'autobahn' at 50
Christian Science Monitor ^ | June 28, 2006 | Editorial

Posted on 06/28/2006 11:04:21 AM PDT by Graybeard58

On June 29, 1956, President Eisenhower signed a bill to build the Interstate Highway System - a dream of his since he crossed the US in 1919 and, later, after he saw Hitler's autobahn. Little did he know what 46,876 miles of expressways would do.

Fifty years on, the nation is still taking stock of the impact of high-speed roads connecting big cities. The system was finished only last year with the completion of Boston's "Big Dig" project. Instead of taking 10 years and $50 billion to build as envisioned, the 62 routes took nearly a halfcentury to finish and, in today's dollars, cost $425 billion.

Just as the "information superhighway" (the Internet) is now taken for granted as essential to daily life, so, too, is the Interstate Highway System. Both require amazing levels of cooperation to build and maintain. Both have helped unify the country. And yet both are bearers of good and bad effects. In fact, lessons from the Interstate are worth applying to the Internet, which is still in relative infancy.

As the world's largest public-works project, the Interstate fully transformed Americans into a car-centric, oil-guzzling, and pollution-spewing people. Soon after the system's first cross-country link (I-80) was completed in 1986, Al Gore declared, hyperbolically, that the automobile's environmental effects is "more deadly than that of any military enemy we are ever again likely to confront." That warning is quite a contrast from an original reason for the Interstate, which was to allow quick movement of military forces and, possibly, mass evacuations of cities during the cold war. (The exodus of 1.5 million people before hurricane Katrina proved the worth of big highways.)

The Internet, too, originated as a useful tool for sharing military research, and while serving the public immensely, it also serves as a vehicle for terrorist communications and forfor other vice from porn to gambling.

Some say it has adversely altered community life, creating new forms of isolation, much the way Interstates tore up cities and helped create sprawling, pedestrian-unfriendly suburbs. More communities now want sound-barriers along Interstates and to limit the highways' impact on downtown life, while many people want to limit the Internet's effects and return to face-to-face talking.

What really pushed both the Interstate and the Internet into full blossom was business. (Both systems greatly boosted economic productivity.) The trucking industry lobbied heavily for new highways, while Internet-dependent businesses today are fighting to expand (or control) the Web.

Both these people-connectors are suffering from congestion and inadequate maintenance. To keep up with repairs of the Interstate, some states are turning to private ownership and mileage fees. To expand the Internet, cable and telephone companies want to charge for high-speed access.

Indeed, both systems allow Americans to speed up their lives. But the Interstate's effects show society must humbly, carefully adopt the Internet.

At the 1939 New York World's Fair, a General Motors exhibit called Futurama predicted fast highways by 1960, with speeds up to 100 m.p.h. A narrator's voice carried both hope and caution: "Who can say what new horizons lie before us?"


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: algore; bridgeto21stcentury; eisenhower; environmentalism; evacuation; highways; interstate; nationaldefense; smartgrowth; socialistutopians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: Terpfen
Transport was one of the only things about war Ike understood.

Little early in the day to have your nose in the slop jar isn't it?? Out of curiosity....just what shortcoming do you find in the General's ability to understand war that you take issue with??

61 posted on 06/28/2006 1:11:35 PM PDT by RVN Airplane Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

post 18 was pretty funny. people would be complaining that people who immigrated from NYC were moving into their communities


62 posted on 06/28/2006 1:15:19 PM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
What they don't tell you is how closely tied in the Interstate system was with "urban renewal." A lot of people lost their homes in the vain hope of cutting commuting times for others. Some form of highway system was necessary and desireable, but it's unfortunate that safeguards weren't in place to protect those who were "in the way" and didn't have the power to fight back. If people really are upset about Kelo and other abuses of eminent domain, we might think twice about celebrating the Interstate system.
63 posted on 06/28/2006 1:19:53 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Is the article citing $50 billion amount as what was projected in 1956, meaning, 1956 dollars?

Because adjusted for inflation, that projection equals $344,900,356,595.71 (roughly $345 billion) which is much closer to that $425 billion amount.


64 posted on 06/28/2006 1:22:53 PM PDT by BaBaStooey (I heart Emma Caulfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: statered
You know the flip side is it makes it easier for an invading army to conquer you.

Conjures up memories of that Patrick Swayze classic "Red Dawn".
65 posted on 06/28/2006 1:25:49 PM PDT by Rep-for-real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RVN Airplane Driver

I already listed three case examples. Falaise, autumn 1944 stalemate, Ardennes.


66 posted on 06/28/2006 1:30:42 PM PDT by Terpfen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
I can see an argument against suburban sprawl
Sometimes even conservatives fall for the idea that "sprawl" is a bad thing, forgetting that it simply represents individuals living as they prefer.

The left objects because dense populations with limited mobility are easier to control.

-Eric

67 posted on 06/28/2006 1:47:59 PM PDT by E Rocc (Myspace "Freepers" group moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I'm not too good at links, but found this:

hell-for-leather adv Also hell-bent for leather [Engl dial; cf EDD (at hell sb.

1. (9))] scattered, but esp West Cf hell-bent for election adv phr 1 At top speed, in great haste.1919 DN 5.76 wMA, Hell bent for leather is the expression to which I am most used. 1939 (1973) FWP Guide MT 414, Hell-for-leather—In great haste. " Ridin ' hell-for-leather " suggests very hard use of leather (i.e., whip). 1939 in 1984 Lambert- Franks Voices 46 OK, Many a time I ' ve seen a bunch of bandits come riding hell-for-leather past the camp, the Regulars (the soldiers) pounding along right behind. 1940 (1942) Clark Ox-Bow 81 NV, I saw that kid Greene, from down to Drew ' s, come by here hell-for-leather half an hour ago. 1950 WELS (To run very fast, especially running away from something) 1 Inf, seWI, Run hell-for-leather. 1954 Forbes Rainbow 181 NEng, " He ' s coming so Hell-for-leather, " says Jude, " he may shoot right by us. 1968 Adams Western Words 145, Hell-for-leather. 1988 DARE File, My Dad, who grew up in Idaho, uses the term " hell-for-leather " ; I was surprised when his cousin, who is from Nebraska, said he knew it as " hell-for-election. "

Source: Dictionary of American Regional English, Harvard University Press

68 posted on 06/28/2006 1:48:21 PM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace

Mr. Inspectorette and I are hoping to take a month-long trip next year from West-East on I-80, then back home East-West on I-10, then I-5 north.


69 posted on 06/28/2006 1:50:40 PM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

This planet would be a paradise if we could only get rid of the imperfect pesky, people.


70 posted on 06/28/2006 1:52:26 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
Transport was one of the only things about war Ike understood.

Are you sure about that? So Ike didn't win the war fast enough for you? Maybe you should examine Field Marshal Montgomery a little closer. Or how about the parts of the Roosevelt administration that feared Allied forces would meet the Russians some where near what is now the western Polish boarder and start slugging it out with each other.

71 posted on 06/28/2006 2:03:26 PM PDT by oyez (Appeasement is insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Soon after the system's first cross-country link (I-80) was completed in 1986, Al Gore declared, hyperbolically, that the automobile's environmental effects is "more deadly than that of any military enemy we are ever again likely to confront."

Well, the Interstate Highway System is 50 years old, and Al Gore's brain-dead environmental hyperbole is at least 20 years old.

72 posted on 06/28/2006 2:06:53 PM PDT by dirtboy (When Bush is on the same side as Ted the Swimmer on an issue, you know he's up to no good...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez

I'm well aware of the political situation of WW2, and Montgomery's legendary aptitude for doing nothing. Problem is, Ike gave him the priority of supply throughout most of the European campaign.


73 posted on 06/28/2006 2:08:21 PM PDT by Terpfen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: statered
You know the flip side is it makes it easier for an invading army to conquer you.

Yeah, but they'll get killed off trying to make it across Pennsylvania, where merge lanes are ten feet long.

74 posted on 06/28/2006 2:08:22 PM PDT by dirtboy (When Bush is on the same side as Ted the Swimmer on an issue, you know he's up to no good...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

AMC was running Anastasia this A.M.; the scenes outside the bedroom window where the jointed, mechanical millipede kept appearing in the dusky twilight, windows aglow, was made real when the long-lost princess boarded the true-life version a few scenes later as though there was only one important place to go on what was then a modern train with aerodynamically-shaped cars and comfortable seats for those who deserved to be transported in such grand style and she was whisked to claim her birthright.

Such memories; fifty years or five hundred, time is always only a bend in the road away.

(Here's comes the well-dressed hare in checkered gilet and flat-brimmed grille-pain chapeau.)


75 posted on 06/28/2006 2:08:51 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
Transport was one of the only things about war Ike understood.

So General Napoleon, why don't you tell us how much more you understand.

76 posted on 06/28/2006 2:14:28 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stan_25
As for the railroads, they did that to themselves. They priced themselves out of the markets years ago. People have found that hauling freight by truck is much cheaper and quicker. With a truck, you can take the load right to the location where it is needed

I believe that the Private railroads in this country are actually profitable, and have been for decades. CSX was bought by private firms after a bidding contest (about 6 years ago if I remember correctly).
What the interstates did was, with the connivance of the Automakers et al, to destroy passenger rail. Where if you are in a hurry take a plane and auto is often just as fast and much more convenient and normally cheaper (especially with a family).

77 posted on 06/28/2006 2:16:42 PM PDT by Fraxinus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
Falaise, autumn 1944 stalemate, Ardennes.

The German Army didn't have anything to do with that I suppose.

78 posted on 06/28/2006 2:18:33 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: futurekentuckylawyer
"Future Home of I-66"

Ahem. I'll take this one. Perhaps there is some confusion? Last year, according to wikipedia, this happened:

"In 2005, as part of the reconstruction of the plaza in front of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, an entrance was opened from 25th Street, N.W., to westbound I-66. However, at least one sign in the vicinity misidentified the route as the unrelated (and no longer existent) U.S. Highway 66.

Harrumph!

79 posted on 06/28/2006 2:34:46 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace

Couldn't have said it better myself!


80 posted on 06/28/2006 2:40:52 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson