Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AngryJawa

The military decision to switch to the 9mm was based more on logistics than kill effectiveness. Too bad our soldiers are using the "minimum" level handgun. Basically the rest of the world was using 9mm. To get .45 ammunition to wars we had to cart the stuff over ourselves. You can get .9mm ammunition everywhere. Another case of Globalization not being the best for the US. I suppose the logistics wonks in the military like the switch. But I'd rather have the bigger gun.


33 posted on 06/28/2006 6:43:25 AM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X = they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Rameumptom
The US military is already in the process of switching back over to the .45 auto. A number of elite units are using M1911's while the powers-that-be are holding a competition for a more modern replacement.

I agree with your disdain for the 9mm in a military setting. That said, there probably would not have been the amount of complaints about the Beretta's stopping power if we weren't restricted by treaty from using modern hollow point rounds.

36 posted on 06/28/2006 6:58:08 AM PDT by AngryJawa ({NRA}{IDPA})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson