Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hey New York Times, YOU Shut the Hell Up!
FGS | 06/28/2006 | FGS

Posted on 06/27/2006 11:23:08 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: bitt; devolve; ForGod'sSake
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

61 posted on 06/28/2006 1:32:31 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

62 posted on 06/28/2006 1:33:56 PM PDT by Beckwith (The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pajamajan; All

Qaeda Relocates to U.S. for Spy-Free Calling

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:KmXkxby63TsJ:www.scrappleface.com/index.php%3Fp%3D2108+tracking+cell+phones+leahy+osama&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=25

2005-12-21) — Al Qaeda announced today it would relocate its international headquarters to an unnamed U.S. city in order to take advantage of espionage-free local, and state-to-state, phone calls.

“Al Qaeda will thrive in the land of liberty,” said an unnamed spokesman on a 30-minute pre-recorded DVD. “We’re still shopping for a primary location with great access to transportation and, Allah be praised, good public schools.”

The al Qaeda source said Democrats in Congress recommended the move after the The New York Times revealed that the National Security Administration listens in on communications between international terrorists and some U.S. residents.

The source said no matter where al Qaeda plants its U.S. headquarters, it will incorporate in tax-free Nevada.



63 posted on 06/28/2006 2:25:57 PM PDT by bitt (NY Times to New York: Drop Dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/21/AR2005122101994_2.html

File the Bin Laden Phone Leak Under 'Urban Myths'
"He communicates by satellite phone, even though Afghanistan in some levels is back in the Middle Ages and a country that barely functions," Bergen said.

Bergen noted that as early as 1997, bin Laden's men were very concerned about electronic surveillance. "They scanned us electronically," he said, because they were worried that anyone meeting with bin Laden "might have some tracking device from some intelligence agency." In 1996, the Chechen insurgent leader Dzhokhar Dudayev was killed by a Russian missile that locked in to his satellite phone signal.



A leak alerted Osama bin Laden to telephone surveillance, according to President Bush and others. (AP)


That same day, CBS reported that bin Laden used a satellite phone to give a television interview. USA Today ran a profile of bin Laden on the same day as the Washington Times's article, quoting a former U.S. official about his "fondness for his cell phone."

It was not until Sept. 7, 1998 -- after bin Laden apparently stopped using his phone -- that a newspaper reported that the United States had intercepted his phone calls and obtained his voiceprint. U.S. authorities "used their communications intercept capacity to pick up calls placed by bin Laden on his Inmarsat satellite phone, despite his apparent use of electronic 'scramblers,' " the Los Angeles Times reported.

Officials could not explain yesterday why they focused on the Washington Times story when other news organizations at the same time reported on the satellite phone -- and that the information was not particularly newsworthy.

"You got me," said Benjamin, who was director for counterterrorism on the National Security Council staff at the time. "That was the understanding in the White House and the intelligence community. The story ran and the lights went out."

Lee H. Hamilton, vice chairman of the Sept. 11 commission, gave a speech in October in which he said the leak "was terribly damaging." Yesterday, he said the commission relied on the testimony of three "very responsible, very senior intelligence officers," who he said "linked the Times story to the cessation of the use of the phone." He said they described it as a very serious leak.

But Hamilton said he did not recall any discussion about other news outlets' reports. "I cannot conceive we would have singled out the Washington Times if we knew about all of the reporting," he said.

A White House official said last night the administration was confident that press reports changed bin Laden's behavior. CIA spokesman Tom Crispell declined to comment, saying the question involves intelligence sources and methods.
..........


64 posted on 06/28/2006 2:30:01 PM PDT by bitt (NY Times to New York: Drop Dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch


Gliding in deadstick with no power!


65 posted on 06/28/2006 2:49:29 PM PDT by devolve (fx 9125_AMERICANS_KILLED_2003_BY_ILLEGALS MEX_ILLEGAL_GOT_911_TERRORISTS_ID NO_NUEVO_TEJAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: devolve

LOL, it's a 'perhaps', a 'wish'!! Better watch out, I can put any words on that I want!!


66 posted on 06/28/2006 2:52:00 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Excellent material...there was a thread floating around here earlier today about a planned protest AT the NYT building; you might want to search around for it and volunteer your work as poster material.


67 posted on 06/28/2006 2:56:25 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (Meep Meep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

Hmmmmm, one down, how many to go??? Looks like the rest of 'em are circling the fearless crusader.


68 posted on 06/28/2006 5:48:29 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Nice!


69 posted on 06/28/2006 5:49:29 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
Hmmmmm, one down, how many to go???

LOL, not down yet but we're hoping!!

70 posted on 06/28/2006 5:56:38 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Thanks for the info. Our faux press has been up to no good for a very long time. With the advent of the internet, word of their shenanigans can go around the world in a matter of seconds. And it does, thanks to forums like FR and others.

Just a guess, but I believe the losers in the MSM are becoming more shrill because that's the way liberals respond to any challenge. Say it long and loud. Makes no difference whether it's fake, accurate, fraudulent or otherwise. Goebbels could learn a thing or two from these people. Still in all, I think we're winning........this battle.

FGS

71 posted on 06/28/2006 5:59:30 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Excellent material...there was a thread floating around here earlier today about a planned protest AT the NYT building; you might want to search around for it and volunteer your work as poster material.

Thanks. I ran across that thread earlier but didn't have time at the time to post anything. I think it was a thread sourcing Michelle Malkin's site. I'll go looking around to see what I can see.

72 posted on 06/28/2006 6:02:52 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
LOL, not down yet but we're hoping!!

Just so; how long before we can administer the coup de gras???

73 posted on 06/28/2006 6:06:34 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Another traitor of the highest order was celebrating the 35th anniversary of his appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which launched his political career.


http://hedgehogcentral.blogspot.com/2006/04/john-kerrys-faneuil-hall-speech.html


74 posted on 06/28/2006 6:14:21 PM PDT by bitt (NY Times to New York: Drop Dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I shudder to think how close we came to having doofus for a president. I pray Americans are waking up to the dangers the Dims and their media cheerleaders pose for our republic.


75 posted on 06/28/2006 6:27:21 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Good question, I don't have the answer.


76 posted on 06/28/2006 6:48:13 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Excellent.


77 posted on 06/28/2006 6:49:06 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

Stop it, yer makin' me blush! So, howya been and whaddaya hear from Mud?


78 posted on 06/28/2006 6:54:25 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

I don't remember hearing a peep from the NYT when Clinton sold trade secrets to the North Koreans.


79 posted on 06/28/2006 6:59:33 PM PDT by 3catsanadog (When anything goes, everything does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Somewhere around here (I think at the office) I've got Mud's email. He's gone into business for himself. Doin' pretty good I think.


80 posted on 06/28/2006 7:00:01 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson