Hey New York Times, YOU Shut the Hell Up!

FGS | 06/28/2006 | FGS

[reagan_fanatic]

Very nice - too bad we can't put this on a billboard directly across from the Times building.

[ForGod'sSake]

Obviously, the people inside government with top security clearances shopped the story to anyone who would listen.

And there would likely be another one right behind 'em to take their place. Which means "W" and company have got to crack some skulls if they hope to have a prayer of keeping anything from our enemies and would be enemies. Jail time!

The upshot of this particular round of leaks is that it is essentially a non story. One has to wonder if the "Pinch and Bill" show is designed to protect other players in the money moving world. Who knows what other ties our domestic faux press may have here and around the globe they wouldn't want exposed?

Also, it becomes obvious that these "news" agencies have spies in each other's organizations.

Probably, and what are the chances the muckity mucks get together and compare notes regularly. They might even draw straws to see who gets to "break" a story. God luv 'em, I can live without 'em.

FGS

[ForGod'sSake]

Should we make one up for the uncharacteristically complicit WSJ?

The WSJ is a tough call. Question is, would they have gone to press with it if no one else did? I don't think so but based on nothing more than a hunch.

[shezza]

This new poster needs to find its way to Belly Girl.

[maica]

Ditto to everything you said!

[ForGod'sSake]

Har! Beary good Doug!

[ForGod'sSake]

Excellent!

[presently no screen name]

BTTT!

[ForGod'sSake]

Very nice - too bad we can't put this on a billboard directly across from the Times building.

Ooooohhhhh, now you've done it! Planting the seeds to rub Pinch's nose in it. Maybe some of our DC Freepers could make a new MOAB to send north???

[Grampa Dave]

Actually the WSJ is not a tough call.

The newspaper side of the WSJ was rated more liberal than the NY Slimes last year by a UCLA study.

The editorial side is started to turn liberal with their immigration stances and some other left bs.

Miss Marple and I cancelled our subscriptions to the WSJ for the rants of Al Hunt and his outrageous poll years ago.

Later we found out that Al Hunt was the key hirer of so called journalists for the WSJ for years. It is a safe bet that no one recommended by him would be conservative or fair balanced.

[doug from upland]

I need more questions. :)

[ForGod'sSake]

This new poster needs to find its way to Belly Girl.

Oops, I've been found out. Her poster is actually where I got the idea to do this. Nice catch.

[presently no screen name]

They need to get tough with the media, and continue to call attention to the damage they are doing

Long overdue! Let's see if it happens.

(Personally, I like the idea of taking away the NY T's White House press credentials).

I agree. Anything less would be an insult to those who love America - and, moreso, to our Armed Forces. To me, the NYT prolonged the war - which puts more of them at risk.

[Gone GF]

You forgot the Wall Street Journal and the LA Times.

[ForGod'sSake]

Thanks for the info; point(s) taken.

[ForGod'sSake]

I need more questions. :)

I'll try to come with one or two more to fan the fire a little.

[melancholy]

Wonderful effort to publicize a wonderful picture, thank you both.

A picture of a WANTED WMD called Abu John al-Murthawi would make him our troops' laughing stock!

[Grampa Dave]

[ForGod'sSake]

Heh, thanks; did someone say Murtha. Here's one that's not finished yet. He and his komrades seem to have "stepped in it".

Got Traction?

FGS

[ForGod'sSake]

Ain't it the truth!