Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Return of the Non-Aligned Movement
The American Spectator ^ | 6/27/2006 | Robert T. McLean

Posted on 06/27/2006 10:21:49 PM PDT by neverdem

Set against the backdrop of decolonization and an international environment split between Cold War superpowers, both weak and newly independent states formed a bloc that became known as the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). While essentially contradictory from its inception, it was not until the collapse of the U.S.S.R. and the Warsaw Pact that NAM became largely irrelevant in a seemingly tranquil and unipolar world. However, contemporary attempts to challenge America's global leadership have caused the organization to drastically improve its standing.

Between the 27th and 30th of May, the foreign ministers of the Non-Aligned countries met in Putrajaya, Malaysia. A 60-page "Final Document" produced at the recent meeting in Malaysia is worth exploring as it plainly illustrates both the ideology and goals of this increasingly influential organization. "Terrorism," the document notes in a statement likely aimed at the United States and Israel, "should not be equated with the legitimate struggle of people's under colonial or alien domination and foreign occupation." Palpably referring to the Bush administration, the NAM document affirms that among their objectives is to "oppose and condemn the categorization of countries as good and evil based on unilateral and unjustified criteria, and the adoption of the doctrine of pre-emptive attack."

The document also denounces the "politically motivated" promotion of democracy and the imposition of "unilateral economic sanctions," while defending such member nations as Cuba, Iran, Sudan, Syria, and Venezuela. Perhaps most egregious of the stated methods of NAM is the call for solidarity with member states that have come under international pressure. Clearly a central subject of this pronouncement is the Islamic Republic of Iran. In fact, Tehran's influence was largely on display with the following call to:

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Cuba; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antiamericanaxis; china; geopolitics; iran; iraq; malaysia; nam; nonalignedmovement; outpostsoftyranny; russia; sudan; syria; venezuela

1 posted on 06/27/2006 10:21:54 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yup, "non-aligned," all right.


2 posted on 06/27/2006 10:27:48 PM PDT by Lonely Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull
Yup, "non-aligned," all right.

Does this mean that the NAM countries will not be coming to America with begging bowls in hand?

3 posted on 06/27/2006 10:39:44 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The Non-aligned movement arose because all the world's evil dictators and theocrats wanted to join together to throw parties where nobody would pick on them for being evil.


4 posted on 06/27/2006 10:42:34 PM PDT by Blackyce (President Jacques Chirac: "As far as I'm concerned, war always means failure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The Non-Aligned Movement was always anything but. When I refer occasionally to an internationalist class of ruling elites it is they who provide the model.

"...the aforementioned NAM document stated that the group agreed to request that "the colonialist countries pay full compensation for the economic, social and political consequences of their occupation."

And here is the key to it all - a moral claim that any country that is rich is so only by virtue of theft and that international social justice consists of a transfer of wealth and a subordination of those who have earned to those who demand.

This is, in fact, folklore turned into dogma and even its most earnest proponents do not dare to look too closely at its premises. It is no accident that the movement has decided to embark upon a media venture, although it needn't - most of the Western media have been carrying water for it for the last forty years.

5 posted on 06/27/2006 10:47:55 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Well,I suppose it'll be OK to give them Buffet's, Gate's and Tiger Wood's money. Huh??


6 posted on 06/27/2006 10:52:32 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull
Sounds like every "wanna be" on the block has membership in this gang of non-starters. All the dictators on the planet have found their mouthpiece.

I loved the statements regarding the media and its perceived prejudice in favor of the West. It seems the NYSlimes just can't seem to please anybody---even when they bend-over to try to please these people!! :^)
7 posted on 06/27/2006 10:54:26 PM PDT by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Non-aligned" is a really a euphemism for Third World dictatorships of a socialist bent opposed to Western values, democracy and free markets. Don't be fooled; they really are aligned against us.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

8 posted on 06/27/2006 10:58:38 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
They're socialists. No wonder their countries remain poor decades after they won their independence from the West. Its that same ideology that has sent Russia falling head-long into oblivion. The NAM is not the wave of the future; its the reactionary voice of a discredited past.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

9 posted on 06/27/2006 11:18:45 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

How can anyone call Cuba "non-aligned"? They were clearly on the Soviet side for 30 years.


10 posted on 06/27/2006 11:34:29 PM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Court Grants New Hearing In Case of Taped Phone Call (McDermott - Boehner case)

CU moves to fire Churchill

Iraqi Leader Says No Pardons for Attacks on Americans

From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

11 posted on 06/28/2006 12:00:00 AM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains
How can anyone call Cuba "non-aligned"? They were clearly on the Soviet side for 30 years.

Uhhhhhh, that's what non-aligned really means. Words mean nothing.

12 posted on 06/28/2006 4:37:24 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Without a monkey, "You are nothing, absolutely zero. Absolutely nothing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"Non-aligned" my Aunt Fanny! Most of them were (and many still are) Marxist and Soviet fellow travellers.


13 posted on 06/28/2006 5:53:32 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (Mexico: America's Palestine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blackyce

"The Non-aligned movement arose because all the world's evil dictators and theocrats wanted to join together to throw parties where nobody would pick on them for being evil."

What's the matter -- did the UN stop hosting parties for them?
;-)


14 posted on 06/28/2006 7:37:37 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


15 posted on 06/28/2006 8:31:46 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

These nations are so convenient... saving those State Department workers all that time drawing up proposals for who belongs on the axis of evil...


16 posted on 06/28/2006 10:25:01 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The thing is that Russia and China also spout anti-Americanism off in their respective bodies, but it is not published in US media sources.


17 posted on 07/02/2006 4:06:21 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

Non aligned=In bed with Russian and Chinese weapons and Russia and China themselves.


18 posted on 07/02/2006 4:07:06 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The document also denounces the "politically motivated" promotion of democracy and the imposition of "unilateral economic sanctions," while defending such member nations as Cuba, Iran, Sudan, Syria, and Venezuela.

Seldom does a single sentence reveal so much about a group's true motives as this one has done here.

19 posted on 07/02/2006 4:08:32 PM PDT by dirtboy (When Bush is on the same side as Ted the Swimmer on an issue, you know he's up to no good...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson