Skip to comments.
"Revoke Their Creds" Gains Steam (Hayworth circulating letter to revoke NYTimes creds)
NRO Corner ^
| 6/27/2006
Posted on 06/27/2006 1:31:33 PM PDT by Uncledave
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: Berosus
21
posted on
06/27/2006 2:34:22 PM PDT
by
syriacus
(Superfunds aren't needed, since ONE WORD from Dems neutralizes lethal chemicals -- "RUST")
To: newcthem
"At least J.D. has balls enough to stand up to the MSM......that is a lot more than can be said for Jorge and the congress-citters."
Jorge is a little reluctant to take on the CIA/MSM axis. Cheney tried it and we got the Wilson/Plame frameup. Porter Goss tried and he wound up getting fired. Congressman King said he has a hunch that this leak came from the CIA and that seems to fit.
See article "The New McCarthyism: What the media aren't telling you about CIA leaker Mary McCarthy" by Stephen Hayes at http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Protected/Articles/000/000/012/165kjveg.asp?pg=1
The NY Times feels they can do what they want because they know they have the dissidents at the CIA running interference for them and giving them choice secrets which can destabilize the Administration.
22
posted on
06/27/2006 2:36:54 PM PDT
by
RAldrich
To: God luvs America
does anyone have a link to the original Slimes article? thanks Your question reminds me...I think The Times ran the article because they were hoping to tempt people to buy their hardcopy rag.
23
posted on
06/27/2006 2:37:00 PM PDT
by
syriacus
(Superfunds aren't needed, since ONE WORD from Dems neutralizes lethal chemicals -- "RUST")
To: Uncledave
24
posted on
06/27/2006 2:42:28 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Uncledave
Why doesn't he introduce a resolution condemning the NYT for giving aid and comfort to the enemy. That would seem to be a much stronger rebuke then taking away their credentials.
25
posted on
06/27/2006 2:43:30 PM PDT
by
TXKATE
To: Uncledave
Never happen. Sorry, but don't get hopes up. Wish it would.
26
posted on
06/27/2006 5:27:09 PM PDT
by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: Uncledave
OT: O'REeilly just had Michael Scheuer on (as a CBS analyst), to talk about the leaks & the NYT. Scheuer thinks Bush's political appointees are the leakers. Fox did show the book he wrote. VERY bizarre & disturbing.
27
posted on
06/27/2006 5:32:13 PM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(Yeah! I love President Bush. What a gutsy guy. God Bless America.)
To: kellynla; Berosus
28
posted on
06/27/2006 8:47:29 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006.)
To: tobyhill
call a committee hearing with Keller, Risen and Lickemballs as witnesses, put them under oath and then make them disclose their sources or go to jail.
29
posted on
06/27/2006 8:57:53 PM PDT
by
kcvl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
