Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh's Attorney Roy Black Responds to Media Inquiries
Yahoo news ^

Posted on 06/26/2006 7:04:47 PM PDT by Retired Chemist

MIAMI, June 26 /PRNewswire/ -- Roy Black, Rush Limbaugh's attorney, issued the following statement today in response to several inquiries by the media:

While going through routine Customs inspection of luggage at Palm Beach International Airport upon his return from an international trip, Rush Limbaugh was detained by customs agents after they noticed a non-narcotic prescription drug, which had been prescribed by Mr. Limbaugh's treating physician but labeled as being issued to the physician rather than Mr. Limbaugh for privacy purposes. After a brief interview, Mr. Limbaugh was permitted to continue on his journey.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: adulterer; fornicator; frbigots; libertarians; medicalprivacy; pervert; privacyviolation; royblack; rush; rushlimbaugh; sextourist; sinner; viagra; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 721-731 next last
To: Postal Worker with a gun
So you are saying it is OK to break some laws as they are about something minor.

Law enforcement officers have the ability to show discretion. Cops give out warning instead of tickets all the time for speeding. They also give out warnings in other situations such as a family party getting too loud. It's just good police work.

Do you think that cops arrest or ticket someone every time they engage a member of the public? Have you never seen a cop tell someone to move along rather than arresting them him for loitering?

Using discretion is not the same as ignoring laws.

521 posted on 06/27/2006 12:28:52 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
Using discretion is not the same as ignoring laws.

Rush ignored laws.

522 posted on 06/27/2006 12:31:10 AM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: Postal Worker with a gun
Having Law Enforcement selectively apply laws based on who the violator is is also wrong

Nice strawman. No one has asserted that Limbaugh should have been given a pass because he is rich or famous.

523 posted on 06/27/2006 12:32:19 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
You've got mail!

Thanks! That clears up a lot.

524 posted on 06/27/2006 12:34:27 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

Your welcome and good night!


525 posted on 06/27/2006 12:34:49 AM PDT by Marine Inspector (Government is not the solution to our problem; Government is the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: paulat
Rush ignored laws.

It's not clear that he did.

526 posted on 06/27/2006 12:35:31 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
No one has asserted that Limbaugh should have been given a pass because he is rich or famous.

Yes, they have...please read the thread before you post. Thanks!

527 posted on 06/27/2006 12:36:04 AM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

That is the basis of this whole thread, HOW could they do this to someone like OUR IDOL Rush. Its not like he is Joe Blow.


528 posted on 06/27/2006 12:37:16 AM PDT by Postal Worker with a gun (I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: paulat
Yes, they have...please read the thread before you post. Thanks!

I have and have not seen one post that claims that Limbaugh should be treated differently because he is rich or famous.

Please cite the post number.

529 posted on 06/27/2006 12:37:21 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies]

To: Postal Worker with a gun
That is the basis of this whole thread, HOW could they do this to someone like OUR IDOL Rush. Its not like he is Joe Blow.

The basis of the thread is that it a minor incident was made into big deal. No one has called for special rules for the rich and famous. In fact, most have asserted that this only happened because of Limbaugh's position.

530 posted on 06/27/2006 12:39:35 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: Postal Worker with a gun; JeffAtlanta
That is the basis of this whole thread, HOW could they do this to someone like OUR IDOL Rush. Its not like he is Joe Blow.

It is very clear that you haven't read this thread. Nor has JeffAtlanta.

There are many Rush apologists...and there are many of us who think he was completely stupid about the scrutiny he is under and didn't even take the simplest, common-sense steps to protect himself.

I must emphasize, however, that you have not read the threads.

531 posted on 06/27/2006 12:56:30 AM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn
The issue is that the drug was perscribed to a doctor by another doctor for privacy reasons. I think that's where the misdemeanor comes in.
532 posted on 06/27/2006 1:06:28 AM PDT by N. Beaujon (http://www.nbeaujon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: deport

"I wonder what the ethics say about a physican that would issue a script for someone and use a false name in place of the person for whom the script is for?.."


In what way is protecting a persons identity unethical?


533 posted on 06/27/2006 1:11:02 AM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Retired Chemist
What an accommodating doctor. Issue a prescription for a man being monitored by the Court, in a name other than his own.

Sounds about the same as Ann Coulter registering to vote using the address of her realtor instead of her own.....for privacy reasons.

Is there something in the water in Florida, or in the heads of celebrities who think minor little laws don't apply to them.

534 posted on 06/27/2006 1:16:27 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
Your post #173 has made the most sense so far. It would seem the doctor is the one who erred.

Under the circumstances I can't imagine why he would risk Rush having a complication in his monitoring.

535 posted on 06/27/2006 1:24:23 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

It is not illegal for a doctor to provided Prescription. This is going now wear. This is harassment plan and sample.


536 posted on 06/27/2006 1:25:28 AM PDT by man from mars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Retired Chemist

Let me get this straight. If I get a prescription and the twit behind the counter types it wrong, I've committed a crime?

Have you seen the idiots working in Doctor's offices and pharmacies?

And, if I get stopped at the airport, they broadcast what kind of ass cream I use?

Why the hell are we wasting air on liberals? Is there a reason to even consider negotiating with these little ass wipes?

(who cares, move on, we all get old and if this gives him pleasure, whatever.)


537 posted on 06/27/2006 1:32:59 AM PDT by Joe_October (Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulat

Anyone that has read my posts over time knows I have little use for the egotistical Rush. Go back to my first post in this thread, he broke the law, no matter how minor a law does not matter. Too many that post here feel he was singled out or should have been given a bye. I do not think that way. He should be glad they only delayed him 3 hours, if I was the cop, he would be in jail on probation violation.


538 posted on 06/27/2006 2:45:11 AM PDT by Postal Worker with a gun (I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: AprilfromTexas

Thanks for info.

And you're right about Rush! Great line!


539 posted on 06/27/2006 2:47:16 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: shempy

Agreed on the backfire! This will mobilize the Republican/conservative base.

People talk about police abuse and "driving while black." This sounds like Rush's offense was "flying while conservative."

Next time someone talks about Watergate and "dirty tricks," I will remind them of this - as well as the National Guard memo.

If these things had been done to a liberal we'd have an outcry like you wouldn't believe.


540 posted on 06/27/2006 2:50:27 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 721-731 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson