Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat Down Cycle (On the defensive in key Senate races/Lieberman looks good/Mineta's successor)
The American Prowler ^ | 6/26/2006 | The Prowler

Posted on 06/25/2006 9:13:37 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: nickcarraway

It's the same thing that happened in 1896. Aldai Stevenson I was seen as too much of an Establishment candidate by delegates who wanted "Fresh voices," so they went with William Jennings Bryan for the next three elections. The result was that they lost the Presidential election for the next twenty years. Those who don't remeber their history, etc.


21 posted on 06/25/2006 10:55:59 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator

It bemusing to see Dems being deluded on the basis of polls, they think they got a nation so vast and so diverse like America covered on the basis of polling a few thousand people.

However the Republicans are pleased to have their Dems as their opponents.


22 posted on 06/25/2006 10:56:46 PM PDT by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
The reason Dean has held his job is sort of stated but not fully in the story. First Dean ran on the platform that he would take the money that the DNC collected and return it to the states for get out the vote efforts. Since most DNC members are state officers from Blue States, Dean promised to return the money to the states. He promised not to return money to just a few states with contested races but to return money in nearly equal amounts to all states. The state officials ate that up. Consider than in very Demoratic states the local parties never got any DNC money at all. It all went to the battleground states. Very competitive states got nearly all the RNC money. States where demorats were certain winners or losers got no money. Ypu have seen stories were the RNC has next to no money on hand. That is not because Dean has failed to raise the money, He has raised the money. But he has returned it to the states on a nearly equal basis.

The national party is angry as heck. They think the money going to Mass. for example should all be spent in PA to defeat Santorum. But the national party does not have enough votes in the RNC to defeat Dean. And the state officials that are getting money for the first time are not about to let them replace Dean and take the money away.

Dean is conserned about getting himself reelected. He is not concerned about needy races getting needed money.

Dean also says outrageous things that please the hard core base. They don't think he is out of line. They think he sould be more outspoken. Since hard core base members are a majority of the members of the RNC, Dean is secure.

It is true in both parties. What pleases the base offends the moderate and centrist voters. The base does not understand that fact. So the Democratic base is happy but the party loses races.

23 posted on 06/25/2006 11:03:47 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Not only are we going to New Hampshire, Tom Harkin, we're going to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico! We're going to California and Texas and New York! And we're going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan! And then we're going to Washington, D.C. to... ah, screw it. We're getting our butts kicked again, Yeeeeeaaaaaargggggh!
24 posted on 06/25/2006 11:08:55 PM PDT by Reform4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: appeal2

Dems hanging Leiberman out to dry, for doing nothing more than recognizing the War on Terror for what it is.. shows you just how irrellevant and nutjob that party has become.


25 posted on 06/25/2006 11:13:17 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Publius

I say Isaac Yeffet, former El Al security chief. How about appointing a replacement for Mineta that would be worth a damn?


26 posted on 06/26/2006 12:58:43 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

I would rather have Lieberman continue as Senator than a New England RINO Republican in his seat. If only to further the Left's drive to blatant anti-semitism.


27 posted on 06/26/2006 3:34:53 AM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; doug from upland; Peach; Alamo-Girl; b4its2late; retrokitten; cripplecreek; daybreakcoming; ...

ping a ling :-)

So goes the big Dem "advantage". Woo


28 posted on 06/26/2006 3:59:48 AM PDT by saveliberty (Dessert Cart Democrats - they ate their advantage. Now they are in trouble LOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

Thanks for ping, SL:) Undoubtedly- Howard Dean is a dream come true!


29 posted on 06/26/2006 4:12:28 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

BTTT


30 posted on 06/26/2006 4:20:11 AM PDT by tiredoflaundry (The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

You're welcome, Mom! :-)

Let's hope that DrDean can keep his job for a couple more election cycles. Woo hoo! And Nancy Pelosi too

Bwhahahahahahahha


31 posted on 06/26/2006 4:21:04 AM PDT by saveliberty (Dessert Cart Democrats - they ate their advantage. Now they are in trouble LOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; dighton; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; LdSentinal

Stay the course. Full speed ahead!


32 posted on 06/26/2006 4:27:22 AM PDT by Coop (No, there are no @!%$&#*! polls on Irey vs. Murtha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry

Woo hoo! :-)

Never fear! The Dems are experts at tossing away any advantage :-)

Or rolling along on the Dessert Cart ;-)


33 posted on 06/26/2006 4:28:43 AM PDT by saveliberty (Dessert Cart Democrats - they ate their advantage. Now they are in trouble LOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: shteebo

W even supported snarlin' arlen.


34 posted on 06/26/2006 4:29:25 AM PDT by mathluv (Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GregH

I am not convinced they are deluded. That is why they are trying to get around the Electoal College.


35 posted on 06/26/2006 4:33:05 AM PDT by mathluv (Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

At least in Michigan, Stabenaw & Granholm are nearly killing the State. Unemployment is rampant and schools are in trouble (which used to be a shoe-in for Dems). At this point, they are beginning to lose the support of even Democrats. Interestingly, Granholm came into office blaming Engler for the State's problems even though Clinton had been President for eight years and other states were also feeling the pinch. Now that other states are pulling out and Michigan is trailing in recovery, she is blaming President Bush - since the only other alternative would be to look in the mirror. However, I suspect most of the papers and most of the Dems won't see the double standard (or at least will claim not to).


36 posted on 06/26/2006 4:37:36 AM PDT by onevoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
In her profound ignorance, her heinous wanted Dean in that spot. She thought he would be marginalized and she'd be in charge.

Perhaps she thought he'd shut his mouth. LOLOL

37 posted on 06/26/2006 4:42:35 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

38 posted on 06/26/2006 5:22:07 AM PDT by Gritty (What's at issue in the Iraq war is not the future of Iraq but the future of America - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

BTTT


39 posted on 06/26/2006 5:25:23 AM PDT by MattinNJ (The paleocon's paleocon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
Morning, Save. Thanks for the ping. Always nice to read something encouraging to start the week.
40 posted on 06/26/2006 6:04:15 AM PDT by FOXFANVOX (God Bless Our Military!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson