Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush Job Approval (44%)
Rasmussen Reports ^ | 6-23-06 | Staff

Posted on 06/23/2006 9:03:57 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182

Forty-four percent (44%) of Americans approve of the way that George W. Bush is performing his role as President. That’s the highest rating he has received since April 14. This update is based upon nightly telephone interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. With a three-percentage point margin of sampling error, this spike may be little more than statistical noise.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; jobapproval; polls; rasmussen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Job approval is trending up. I hope that continues for it will help the midterm elections.
1 posted on 06/23/2006 9:04:00 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Caution: this spike may be little more than statistical noise. The poll has a plus or minus 3% margin of error.


2 posted on 06/23/2006 9:05:51 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

47 or 41. The media will spin this, give them 24 hours to contact the dnc and get on the same page with a story.


3 posted on 06/23/2006 9:09:10 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

The DMB has already noticed and the all out effort to drive these numbers down is underway. Polls now exist to shape opinion, not to find out what people think or care about.


4 posted on 06/23/2006 9:09:42 PM PDT by Bahbah (Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

I never believe that when these polls do everything they can to make Bush numbers suck. Anyway, that is how I will spin it.


5 posted on 06/23/2006 9:10:27 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

exactly why the NYT and LAT wrote that story.


6 posted on 06/23/2006 9:10:53 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
The media will spin this, give them 24 hours to contact the dnc and get on the same page with a story.

There's a dedicated fax machine in every MSM copy room marked "DNC Only". They usually have to replace the paper several times a day.

7 posted on 06/23/2006 9:11:12 PM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Why even poll a Democrat on this subject? I think they should take the poll again, remove any obvious left leaning answers and find out what the real numbers are. I would bet it would be much closer to 55 or 60%, even among conservative Democrats.


8 posted on 06/23/2006 9:13:25 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Briefly off topic...anyone else noticing slowing at FR? We have storms not far away, so it could be local. Just wondering.


9 posted on 06/23/2006 9:14:49 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Disaffection of the Republican base is still the reason for his low approval. If he had championed nullification of the Supreme Court's odious Eminent Domain decision, protection of the nation's borders, and ending the invasion of illegal immigrants, his approval would be in the 70-80% range.

What a wasted opportunity--to do what's right, to come to the aid of his country and its citizens, to protect the rights of Americans, and to gain a strong political advantage!

What a silly waste of opportunity.

10 posted on 06/23/2006 9:15:05 PM PDT by Savage Beast (9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President George Bush and his supurb leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
How could he "nullify" a USSC decision?
11 posted on 06/23/2006 9:16:50 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Executive Order: Protecting the Property Rights of the American People
12 posted on 06/23/2006 9:16:56 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

... and if Dems win in Nov, he'll be impeached.


13 posted on 06/23/2006 9:20:35 PM PDT by nikola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

who gives a sheeeeet about this worthless stat..?


14 posted on 06/23/2006 9:21:23 PM PDT by nikos1121 (There's only two kinds of music.....Good music and Bad music--Louis Armstrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
With a three-percentage point margin of sampling error, this spike may be little more than statistical noise.

When it was declining I don't recall any such explanation of maybe the decline was just statistical noise; just an oversight I am sure.

15 posted on 06/23/2006 9:22:12 PM PDT by Joe Miner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
How could he "nullify" a USSC decision?

First step would be to get out the big stick: federal dollars. Remove federal funding from any project - maybe even any governmental body - that uses eminent domain to transfer property from one private citizen to another. How much federal money is used for New Haven's big project? What if they didn't get any of that? What if New Haven lost all federal funding for every project for stealing Kelo's house?

Next, push for a Constitutional amendment and lean on the states to pass their own state constitutional amendments to prohibit this. The bully pulpit is powerful, but only if it is used.

16 posted on 06/23/2006 9:31:39 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Never ask a Kennedy if he'll have another drink. It's nobody's business how much he's had already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
He could have led the charge--and should have. He and the Republican Congressional leadership should immediately have called for Congress to inact legislation to nullify that decision even if it required a Constitutional Amendment.
17 posted on 06/23/2006 9:46:48 PM PDT by Savage Beast (9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President George Bush and his supurb leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Man you are really pissed. Why?


18 posted on 06/23/2006 9:48:21 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

And see Post #12.


19 posted on 06/23/2006 9:48:32 PM PDT by Savage Beast (9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President George Bush and his supurb leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

So I guess we can expect a 20 point bounce? The other 20 points coming when he solves immigration?


20 posted on 06/23/2006 9:50:25 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson