Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/22/2006 6:29:23 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NormsRevenge

wonder why the Supremes declined the case in 2003?


2 posted on 06/22/2006 6:32:31 PM PDT by rface ("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I love that cross. Whenever I see it a feeling of great peace washes over me. This is so sad. I will pray.


3 posted on 06/22/2006 6:32:45 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

For 52 years people survived living with that cross. It isn't hurting anybody, lots of people probably like it. So why should it come down now? If people don't like looking at it they can turn their eyes elsewhere.


4 posted on 06/22/2006 6:33:18 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
One stinking atheist brought this about. May he rot with tookie.
5 posted on 06/22/2006 6:34:04 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Anyone think that the Roberts court is in favor of removing all the crosses from Arlington National Cemetary?


6 posted on 06/22/2006 6:34:57 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
U.S. District Court Judge Gordon Thompson Jr. found in May that the city was demonstrating an unconstitutional endorsement of one religion over others by maintaining the 29-foot cross in a municipal hilltop park.

It's only un-Constitutional for the FEDERAL government to ESTABLISH a religion. If these folks are lawyers, why can't they read?

7 posted on 06/22/2006 6:35:36 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Why not sell the small plot of land where the cross is to a private not-for-profit set up for the sole purpose of holding possession of that land for "conservation" purposes? Since the cross would then be on private property it would be outside of the purview of the First Amendment's restrictions. I'm sure enough donations could be had to maintain it privately.

While it is an end run around the Court's rulings I don't see how it would be illegal unless California law would prohibit it.


9 posted on 06/22/2006 6:37:04 PM PDT by slykens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

They should bury a vet right at the base and deed it to his family. Problemo solved.


10 posted on 06/22/2006 6:37:52 PM PDT by Mercat (Looks like all the Dummies got for Fitzmas was a beat-up scooter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Can't wait for this one.



13 posted on 06/22/2006 6:45:11 PM PDT by AnnaZ (Victory at all costs-in spite of all terror-however long and hard the road may be-for survival)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I cant think of a vile enough name to call anyone who is opposed to this cross, and I am pretty good at vile names.


14 posted on 06/22/2006 6:59:29 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Is this the cross at a cemetery? If so,what religion(s) were those buried there? If they were Christians,case closed as far as I'm concerned.Ditto with a Star of David in a case where it was Jews buried there.
15 posted on 06/22/2006 7:01:02 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
*This* cross has been there 52 years but *a* cross has been there since 1913. This concrete one replaced the old wooden cross which was knocked down in a windstorm.


18 posted on 06/22/2006 7:28:03 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace higher taxes with Angelides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Some years ago, the Ninth Circus ordered the cross removed, unless the land were sold to private owners. So the land was auctioned off, subject to the restriction that it would be maintained as a "War Memorial" The group that submitted the highest bid, as I recall, was the Ancient Order of Hibernians, aka Irish Catholics, who absolutely would have kept the cross.

A partisan Democrat group, excuse me, an atheist group, sued in the Ninth Circus, alleging that the sale was "unfair" in that the Ancient Order would have had fewer expenses. They were only going to maintain the cross; the atheists were going to demolish it and erect Something Else (no comment), and that would have cost more money. Again, their complaint was that the auction was "unfair". The Ninth Circus found in favor of the atheists.

Were I to comment I'd probably be arrested.

In case anyone neede further explication as to what has happened here.

19 posted on 06/22/2006 7:29:33 PM PDT by Chairman Fred (@mousiedung.commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

20 posted on 06/22/2006 7:33:34 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Don't worry. In Cuba, in Santa Clara they erected in 1957 a statue of Our Lady of the Road (transliteration) at the entrance to the city. Castro ordered it destroyed. It was found 40 years later, after it had come up from the ground were it was buried, and once again stands in the city. Its a shame that this situation is analagous though.


22 posted on 06/22/2006 7:45:55 PM PDT by The Cuban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

To think that the spilled blood of war veterans was shed to give us freedoms and that a few twisted reprobate minds would remove that symbol like a Nazi or Communist. Puke on them who do this.

The USSR repressed Poland from building churches yet the most solid faith in Europe today resides in Poland.
God will never be removed from His people by evil men.
Lets join and fight these evil intentions foisted on us by wicked forces.


24 posted on 06/22/2006 8:04:50 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
I have heard that the city wants the site designated a federal landmark giving it a protected status but Bush is keeping his head in the sand over this one.

If I was president,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

28 posted on 06/26/2006 5:38:21 PM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson