Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge

wonder why the Supremes declined the case in 2003?


2 posted on 06/22/2006 6:32:31 PM PDT by rface ("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rface
wonder why the Supremes declined the case in 2003?

SDO is the reason. Thomas, Rehnquist, Scalia, and maybe Kennedy would have been the only justices on the right side of the case. They would not have chosen to get involved knowing full well where the other 5 goons stood on the issue.

Not surprisingly, Kennedy has taken a nuanced position on these matters. He is way more open to religious displays than the liberals on the court. But he won't go as far as the conservatives. How he will come out on this one is really a coin flip. If I had to guess I would say he will come out on the right side. I am sure that Roberts and Alito will be rock solid on this issue.

26 posted on 06/23/2006 10:43:46 AM PDT by Clump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson