Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2003 UN Report: Iraq Sulfur Mustard Gas Chemical Weapons Have High Quality After 12 years of Storage
March 2003 UN Iraq WMD Report ^ | June 22 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 06/22/2006 11:38:34 AM PDT by jveritas

Since the story broke yesterday about finding 500 Shells of Chemical Weapons in Iraq, shells that contain Sulfur Mustard Gas or Sarin Gas, the Left and their media were quick to dismiss this extremely important find by using the lame excuse that these Chemical weapons Shells were produced before 1991 and hence its not effective anymore because it has much lower quality”. However in March 2003 UN report about Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction there is the following on page 77 (Page 79 of the pdf file), paragraph 1 of the report http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/documents/6mar.pdf :

“ The Sulfur Mustard contained in artillery shells that had been stored for over 12 years, had been found by UNMOVIC to be still of high purity. It is possible that viable filled artillery shells and aerial bombs still remain in Iraq.

The above form the United Nations inspectors and the darling of the Left Hans Blix totally destroy the stupid lies that the Left and their media has been spewing since the breakings new of yesterday. First the UN clearly state in March 2003 that the Mustard gas shells they found are of HIGH QUALITY even it had been STORED FOR OVER 12 YEARS. Second the UN admit that there may still VIABLE i.e. EFFECTIVE Mustrad filled artillery shell hidden in Iraq, and yesterday we learned for a fact that there were indeed 500 Mustard gas artillery shells that were found in Iraq since the removal of Saddam. Also it is safe to conclude that the Mustard Gas shells found after the war are still in high quality and highly effective Chemical weapons.

Another very important fact to add is that Saddam had LIED to the UN inspectors and the world when he said that he had destroyed ALL his Chemical Weapons and other WMD. It does not matter whether these weapons were produced before or after 1991, his job was to destroy it ALL and not hide anything not a one ounce of these WMD, he DID NOT.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: bttt; bushtoldthetruth; chemicalweapons; cnnignores; disarm; iraq; iraqiwmds; jveritas; lied; nuketheleft; onfreep; prewardocs; prewarintelligence; saddam; sarinmustard; scud; scuds; stockpiles; unesco; unscom; wm; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-211 next last
To: pissant

Robinson :)


81 posted on 06/22/2006 12:37:39 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Great job Mo1


82 posted on 06/22/2006 12:38:18 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Liberalism really is a mental disorder. it's fixable, but it requires the acknowledgment of the disorder as the first step. Kind of like the friends of Bill W., crowd.


83 posted on 06/22/2006 12:38:39 PM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

'Bush Lied" screamed the DUmmy.

But we found over 500 shells filled with WMD!

"Yeah, well....Bush stinks and we have the Dixie Chicks on our side...You red staters must be fuming. HAW! One of your great country band has left you to nuance with us on the (all rise) ***LEFT***!! Nobody I know listens to thier music, but we bought the CD just to pi** you all off.

So you found the WMD, we can come up with a new slogan!
"Bush Tried...." er no.. "Bush Cried" no. Shows him as being human.

Let us on the (all rise) ***LEFT** get back with you" the DUmmy speaks with the most connect words he has ever said at one time.


You keep coming up with stuff and we will keep knocking them out of the park Dummy!


84 posted on 06/22/2006 12:39:02 PM PDT by truemiester (If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; jveritas; All

Casey/Rumsfeld pentagon news briefing. (ON NOW - FOX)


85 posted on 06/22/2006 12:39:18 PM PDT by Gucho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ravenspears
any reason why saddam chose not to use these weapons against us during the 2003 incursion in iraq.

Because he expected us to stop short of actually invading Baghdad, and there's no way we would do so if he gassed us.

86 posted on 06/22/2006 12:45:38 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Just an awesome find. Thanks!!


87 posted on 06/22/2006 12:49:41 PM PDT by CheezyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Rumsfeld talking on FNC in response to a question right now about this WMD find.


88 posted on 06/22/2006 12:49:59 PM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dynoman
It is very likely the 155mm sarin shells are binary since the one used in the IED a few years ago was.

I thought the binary ones were post-1991 production. I know we found a bunch of empty binary warheads that were produced after 1991.

89 posted on 06/22/2006 12:50:08 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

bump


90 posted on 06/22/2006 12:50:30 PM PDT by swmobuffalo (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

When it comes to mustard gas, I think they are wrong.


91 posted on 06/22/2006 12:50:32 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes

Thank you Irish


92 posted on 06/22/2006 12:51:08 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Rummy says what was reported was accurate!
93 posted on 06/22/2006 12:51:21 PM PDT by tiredoflaundry (The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
What kind of threat were they if they wouldn't even use these weapons in the most obvious moments?

Archived. ...And the last few days, we owned the roads, not them.

94 posted on 06/22/2006 12:52:01 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry

I hope that Rummy addresses this:


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1653882/posts


95 posted on 06/22/2006 12:52:16 PM PDT by Enchante (General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: ravenspears
"any reason why saddam chose not to use these weapons against us during the 2003 incursion in iraq."

Saddam was saving them for use on DUck Trolls, even terrorist dictators don't want them around.
96 posted on 06/22/2006 12:52:59 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Liberals get up every morning and eat a big box of STUPID for breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
I like to get a hold of all these "unnamed officials"!
97 posted on 06/22/2006 12:54:19 PM PDT by tiredoflaundry (The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Did she really say this?!

Absolutely. Brit questioned the 'panel' as to why the administration didn't release this information earlier. Everyone started piping in(mostly Mort) and the conversation drifted to what TYPE of WMD's Bush was referring to back in 2003... and how the Dem's would frame it. That's when Mara chimed in with “Bush probably came to the conclusion... so what?!”

Mort was of the opinion that it would also be the Dem's reaction to this new revelation... he was dead-on-balls.

98 posted on 06/22/2006 12:55:06 PM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes

Should send this to Alan Colmes. He just kept repeating last night on their show but it's old and is not viable - it's pre '91 WMD blah blah blah.........


99 posted on 06/22/2006 12:55:09 PM PDT by LYSandra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dynoman
As I understand it he shell used in the IED did not produce much sarin because the binary components did not mix properly.

Normally, the binary components mix prior to the dispersal detonation of the shell. There is normally an inner cavity where the components get sloshed together and mixed, with the resultant agent ready to be dispersed - also, the dispersion charge is small in order to not denature the agent. This design requirement is one of the reasons that binary rounds are so obviously different from conventional ones, even when empty.

100 posted on 06/22/2006 12:56:13 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson