Posted on 06/22/2006 7:35:47 AM PDT by drypowder
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50736
My uncle was the lead night shift mechanic for TWA in 1996. That evening he was off. When I asked him what he thought of the fuel tank theory he said "no way".
My daughter and I were home in less than 10 minutes from the first announcement. We, too, saw that clip, and the folks in shock.
At that time, too, there were (?) hopes for survivors. I remember a lot of shots of stuff in the water, and many, many people on the beach.
They were all over the news telling what they saw. All of them pretty much telling the same story. I always wondered if any of them had any "accidents".
I used to think so too, but not anymore. He was definitely ordered to sell the ridiculous fuel tank explosion theory. Who knows though, since the Clintons were in charge and anyone who has ever crossed them takes dirt naps, maybe he had no choice.
I don't know and you have a point. Supposedly 270 people saw a streak and then an explosion. Scores of people witness something coming from the surface to hit the plane but many more did not see anything come from the surface. I don't know what to make of it. Were there any boats in the area that are unexplained?
If they are covering up what happened, you expect them to say otherwise?!
This is why I am skeptical of the missile theory.
Yeah. It was heartbreaking. People going out in boats looking for survivors. Camera shots of debris everywhere. And local newsies stating openly that it was a missile attack.
If I remember right, didn't the news switch gears and start stating that all these witnesses were at parties and could have been drunk etc?
An egg sized incendiary device dropped into the fuel tank by a fuel loader could explain the lack of evidence. The fuel acted as a solvent that slowly dissolved a barrier in the incediary device. Once dissolved, the device would ignite.
I remember it as well, being familiar with Long Island, people from different parts of the south shore were giving the same descriptions even though they were miles apart.
---------------------------------
I personally know two eye-witnesses who saw a rocket trail arc up from the horizon then saw the explosion and the fall. They are both mature, stable people with no axe to grind. I doubt that any CGI illustrated theory would convince them otherwise.
"I always thot James Kalstrum(?) , the lead FBI investigator , was an honest person. Hard to resolve
I used to think so too, but not anymore. He was definitely ordered to sell the ridiculous fuel tank explosion theory. Who knows though, since the Clintons were in charge and anyone who has ever crossed them takes dirt naps, maybe he had no choice."
I believe there is substantial validity to what you guys are saying.
I remember distinctly, in the immediate aftermath of the crash that Kallstrom was adamant, to the point of being righteously PO'ed that this was an act of terror. Then after a few weeks like a dimmer switch, he backed off that stridency considerably and later became an advocate for the center tank explosion theory.
Quite disgusting actually, if this is indeed how the thing went down.
How does an FAA air traffic control radar pick up a surface object? If that radar picked up every metal object on land or sea - ships, buildings, water towers, trucks, trains, what have you - then how can they distinguish air planes from all the ground clutter?
By rights both members of the Dynamic Duo should be wearing orange jump suits, but they're allowed to flit around free as birds with Billy-Goat collecting fat fees for his hillbilly, trailer trash speeches and the voters of New Yarkansas giving the infamous Hillary the privilege to join their other illustrious senator in the hallowed halls of the U. S. Senate.
Amazing.
AP: Washington. The 1,437th 747 exploded today over Los Angeles due to a center fuel tank explosion. The FAA seaid they this will continue until they figure out how to prevent it. Another 747 is expected to explode in the same manner tomorrow.
If they are trying to cover something up, why would they give you info that would prove a coverup? I have an advantage over you in that I was in the NYcity area when it happened and got news BEFORE the newsies and witnesses were shushed.
Yeah, I think we watched the coverage until it was announced around 3 am or so that there would be no survivors.
It was very sad.
I prayed that the initial blast (decompression?) killed everyone, but I understand that later it was found that some pour souls survived initially.
Until the impact with the ocean, and maybe a bit afterwards.
There was a photo of the "streak". Several witnesses in a military helicopter had flown in Viet Nam, had seen and been under missile attack and identified the streak as a missile!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.