Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hundreds of chemical weapons found in Iraq: US intelligence
AFP ^

Posted on 06/22/2006 5:47:51 AM PDT by Freeport

US-led coalition forces in Iraq have found some 500 chemical weapons since the March 2003 invasion, Republican lawmakers said, citing an intelligence report.

"Since 2003, Coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent," said an overview of the report unveiled by Senator Rick Santorum and Peter Hoekstra, head of the intelligence committee of the House of Representatives.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; iraq; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: Freeport

Neither ABC, CBS, NBC nor CNN have reported on this story yet.

CNN: (404) 827-2600
ABC: (212) 456-4040
CBS: (212) 975-3691
NBC: (212) 664-4971


61 posted on 06/22/2006 7:05:12 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Formula1 Fan

How about if you store those harmless weapons in your fridge, you friggin troll


62 posted on 06/22/2006 7:05:25 AM PDT by MJY1288 (THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Freeport

WHY has the Administration waited so long to release and publicize this material?

There was NO DOUBT whatsoever in my mind, the minds of most intelligent services of prior administrations, the minds of intelligence services of other nations, all of Saddam's neighbors, most of his military and the Iraqi people themselves that Saddam had WMD.

ONLY the Democrats and the Leftist Media - AFTER our invasion - seemed to feel that we were chasing a ghost.

There were SO MANY valid reasons for invading IRAQ. WMDs being merely ONE of them.

The Administration has failed to clearly and concisely elucidate them, publicize them, and demolish the imbecilic posture of the Dems on this subject.

These facts should be hammered at again and again whenever the Dems bring up our invasion of Iraq.


63 posted on 06/22/2006 7:06:54 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freeport

Nevertheless, "the impression that the Iraqi Survey Group left with the American people was they didn't find anything," Hoekstra said.






We knew back in October of 2003 that some "WMD-related program activities" were found. Here is a brief summary of the Kay Report of what was found despite efforts to conceal:

We have discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002. The discovery of these deliberate concealment efforts have come about both through the admissions of Iraqi scientists and officials concerning information they deliberately withheld and through physical evidence of equipment and activities that ISG has discovered that should have been declared to the U.N.

Examples of concealment
Let me just give you a few examples of these concealment efforts, some of which I will elaborate on later:

– A clandestine network of laboratories and safehouses within the Iraqi Intelligence Service that contained equipment subject to U.N. monitoring and suitable for continuing CBW (chemical biological weapons) research.

– A prison laboratory complex, possibly used in human testing of BW (bioweapons) agents, that Iraqi officials working to prepare for U.N. inspections were explicitly ordered not to declare to the U.N.

– Reference strains of biological organisms concealed in a scientist's home, one of which can be used to produce biological weapons.

– New research on BW-applicable agents, brucella and Congo Crimean hemorrhagic fever, and continuing work on ricin and aflatoxin were not declared to the U.N.

– Documents and equipment, hidden in scientists' homes, that would have been useful in resuming uranium enrichment by centrifuge and electromagnetic isotope separation.

– A line of UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) not fully declared at an undeclared production facility and an admission that they had tested one of their declared UAVs out to a range of 500 km, 350 km beyond the permissible limit.

– Continuing covert capability to manufacture fuel propellant useful only for prohibited SCUD-variant missiles, a capability that was maintained at least until the end of 2001 and that cooperating Iraqi scientists have said they were told to conceal from the U.N.

– Plans and advanced design work for new long-range missiles with ranges up to at least 1,000 km – well beyond the 150-km range limit imposed by the U.N. Missiles of a 1000 km range would have allowed Iraq to threaten targets throughout the Middle East, including Ankara, Cairo, and Abu Dhabi.

– Clandestine attempts between late-1999 and 2002 to obtain from North Korea technology related to 1,300-km range ballistic missiles – probably the No Dong – 300-km range anti-ship cruise missiles and other prohibited military equipment.

In addition to the discovery of extensive concealment efforts, we have been faced with a systematic sanitization of documentary and computer evidence in a wide range of offices, laboratories and companies suspected of WMD work. The pattern of these efforts to erase evidence – hard drives destroyed, specific files burned, equipment cleaned of all traces of use – are ones of deliberate, rather than random, acts.


64 posted on 06/22/2006 7:07:23 AM PDT by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Ah, thank you for the article. It gives the most important fact: Saddam did NOT destroy all of his WMD as he claimed.


65 posted on 06/22/2006 7:07:41 AM PDT by cake_crumb (One presidential visit to Baghdad is worth 1000 pathetic declarations of defeat from the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Formula1 Fan

Adios trioll! IBTZ!


66 posted on 06/22/2006 7:08:23 AM PDT by 31R1O ("Science is organized knowledge. Wisdom is organized life."- Immanuel Kant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Formula1 Fan

I like how he got Clinton, Gore and Kerry to lie too.


67 posted on 06/22/2006 7:09:01 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 31R1O

trioll=troll ugh.


68 posted on 06/22/2006 7:09:07 AM PDT by 31R1O ("Science is organized knowledge. Wisdom is organized life."- Immanuel Kant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
The MSM has been doing that for a few years now... anytime you hear them say “The buzz on the Internet... ” they start quoting directly from Kos.
69 posted on 06/22/2006 7:11:12 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Formula1 Fan

My goodness, how long before you finally accept the TRUTH??!



An opinion of yours at this stage, in my opinion.

The TRUTH..... Well what is the truth at this time?... I have my doubts the entire truth is known one way or the other and may not or never be known. Time will tell whether you are willing to wait or not is another matter.


70 posted on 06/22/2006 7:12:27 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Formula1 Fan; Darksheare; MikefromOhio; darkwing104
Thanks for playing. Bob, let's show our contestant the wonderful consolation prize:

Image Hosted by The Image Hosting

71 posted on 06/22/2006 7:12:54 AM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever (Political troglodyte with a partisan axe to grind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Only ONE individual mentioned yellowcake out of 65 posts pertinent to the WMD issues as a whole and the FACT that their existence PROVES Saddam broke the cease fire agreement by LYING, NOT DESTROYING WMD HE CLAIMED TOP HAVE DESTROYED and that is the one post you latch onto and rant about. That's amazingly narrow minded, especially since you ignored the facts in his regime's own paperwork that Saddam was actively seeking a nuke program.
72 posted on 06/22/2006 7:13:31 AM PDT by cake_crumb (One presidential visit to Baghdad is worth 1000 pathetic declarations of defeat from the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Formula1 Fan

Sorry troll boy, but the truth is that Saddam still had WMD.
500 chemical shells are proof.
Even ONE shell is proof.


73 posted on 06/22/2006 7:14:07 AM PDT by Darksheare (This is a test of the emergency tagline system. Had there been an emergency, you would have heard...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: liberty_lvr

Troll gone; bad taste remains.


74 posted on 06/22/2006 7:15:15 AM PDT by CedarDave (When a soldier dies, a protester gloats, a family cries, an Iraqi votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: liberty_lvr

Thank you.


75 posted on 06/22/2006 7:16:07 AM PDT by cake_crumb (One presidential visit to Baghdad is worth 1000 pathetic declarations of defeat from the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I was flipping thru the cable news channels around 9:00 am EST and watched Olbermann on MSLSD actually accuse Sen. Santorum of being delusional regarding this discovery. His guest of course was agreeing with him and accused Santorum of being desperate because he is down in the polls in PA. It was disgusting.


76 posted on 06/22/2006 7:19:18 AM PDT by capydick (Not to know is bad; not to wish to know is worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

What does it say on his teeth?


77 posted on 06/22/2006 7:20:05 AM PDT by cake_crumb (One presidential visit to Baghdad is worth 1000 pathetic declarations of defeat from the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb; liberty_lvr

It's post was to me. It's fun to actually catch one myself. Better than physically stomping cockroaches, which I was also doing this morning. :>)


78 posted on 06/22/2006 7:20:39 AM PDT by CedarDave (When a soldier dies, a protester gloats, a family cries, an Iraqi votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
 

First off, I never thought that the WMDs needed to be the reason to go to war.

I agree with you. Below are the actual reasons for going to war. They are lifted directly from President Bush's speech to the United Nations. WMDs are listed as Number-4.

President Bush's reasons for invading Iraq:

Twelve years ago, Iraq invaded Kuwait without provocation. And the regime's forces were poised to continue their march to seize other countries and their resources. Had Saddam Hussein been appeased instead of stopped, he would have endangered the peace and stability of the world. Yet this aggression was stopped -- by the might of coalition forces and the will of the United Nations.

To suspend hostilities, to spare himself, Iraq's dictator accepted a series of commitments. The terms were clear, to him and to all. And he agreed to prove he is complying with every one of those obligations.

He has proven instead only his contempt for the United Nations, and for all his pledges. By breaking every pledge -- by his deceptions, and by his cruelties -- Saddam Hussein has made the case against himself.

Reason Number 1: In 1991, Security Council Resolution 688 demanded that the Iraqi regime cease at once the repression of its own people, including the systematic repression of minorities -- which the Council said, threatened international peace and security in the region. This demand goes ignored. Last year, the U.N. Commission on Human Rights found that Iraq continues to commit extremely grave violations of human rights, and that the regime's repression is all pervasive. Tens of thousands of political opponents and ordinary citizens have been subjected to arbitrary arrest and imprisonment, summary execution, and torture by beating and burning, electric shock, starvation, mutilation, and rape. Wives are tortured in front of their husbands, children in the presence of their parents -- and all of these horrors concealed from the world by the apparatus of a totalitarian state.

Reason Number 2:  In 1991, the U.N. Security Council, through Resolutions 686 and 687, demanded that Iraq return all prisoners from Kuwait and other lands. Iraq's regime agreed. It broke its promise. Last year the Secretary General's high-level coordinator for this issue reported that Kuwait, Saudi, Indian, Syrian, Lebanese, Iranian, Egyptian, Bahraini, and Omani nationals remain unaccounted for -- more than 600 people. One American pilot is among them.

Reason Number 3: In 1991, the U.N. Security Council, through Resolution 687, demanded that Iraq renounce all involvement with terrorism, and permit no terrorist organizations to operate in Iraq. Iraq's regime agreed. It broke this promise. In violation of Security Council Resolution 1373, Iraq continues to shelter and support terrorist organizations that direct violence against Iran, Israel, and Western governments. Iraqi dissidents abroad are targeted for murder. In 1993, Iraq attempted to assassinate the Emir of Kuwait and a former American President. Iraq's government openly praised the attacks of September the 11th. And al Qaeda terrorists escaped from Afghanistan and are known to be in Iraq.

Reason Number 4: In 1991, the Iraqi regime agreed to destroy and stop developing all weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles, and to prove to the world it has done so by complying with rigorous inspections. Iraq has broken every aspect of this fundamental pledge.

Reason Number 5: From 1991 to 1995, the Iraqi regime said it had no biological weapons. After a senior official in its weapons program defected and exposed this lie, the regime admitted to producing tens of thousands of liters of anthrax and other deadly biological agents for use with Scud warheads, aerial bombs, and aircraft spray tanks. U.N. inspectors believe Iraq has produced two to four times the amount of biological agents it declared, and has failed to account for more than three metric tons of material that could be used to produce biological weapons. Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons. United Nations' inspections also revealed that Iraq likely maintains stockpiles of VX, mustard and other chemical agents, and that the regime is rebuilding and expanding facilities capable of producing chemical weapons. And in 1995, after four years of deception, Iraq finally admitted it had a crash nuclear weapons program prior to the Gulf War. We know now, were it not for that war, the regime in Iraq would likely have possessed a nuclear weapon no later than 1993. Today, Iraq continues to withhold important information about its nuclear program -- weapons design, procurement logs, experiment data, an accounting of nuclear materials and documentation of foreign assistance. Iraq employs capable nuclear scientists and technicians. It retains physical infrastructure needed to build a nuclear weapon. Iraq has made several attempts to buy high-strength aluminum tubes used to enrich uranium for a nuclear weapon. Should Iraq acquire fissile material, it would be able to build a nuclear weapon within a year. And Iraq's state-controlled media has reported numerous meetings between Saddam Hussein and his nuclear scientists, leaving little doubt about his continued appetite for these weapons.

Reason Number 6:  Iraq also possesses a force of Scud-type missiles with ranges beyond the 150 kilometers permitted by the U.N. Work at testing and production facilities shows that Iraq is building more long-range missiles that it can inflict mass death throughout the region.

Reason Number 7:  In 1990, after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, the world imposed economic sanctions on Iraq. Those sanctions were maintained after the war to compel the regime's compliance with Security Council resolutions. In time, Iraq was allowed to use oil revenues to buy food. Saddam Hussein has subverted this program, working around the sanctions to buy missile technology and military materials. He blames the suffering of Iraq's people on the United Nations, even as he uses his oil wealth to build lavish palaces for himself, and to buy arms for his country. By refusing to comply with his own agreements, he bears full guilt for the hunger and misery of innocent Iraqi citizens.

Reason Number 8: In 1991, Iraq promised U.N. inspectors immediate and unrestricted access to verify Iraq's commitment to rid itself of weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles. Iraq broke this promise, spending seven years deceiving, evading, and harassing U.N. inspectors before ceasing cooperation entirely. Just months after the 1991 cease-fire, the Security Council twice renewed its demand that the Iraqi regime cooperate fully with inspectors, condemning Iraq's serious violations of its obligations. The Security Council again renewed that demand in 1994, and twice more in 1996, deploring Iraq's clear violations of its obligations. The Security Council renewed its demand three more times in 1997, citing flagrant violations; and three more times in 1998, calling Iraq's behavior totally unacceptable. And in 1999, the demand was renewed yet again. As we meet today, it's been almost four years since the last U.N. inspectors set foot in Iraq, four years for the Iraqi regime to plan, and to build, and to test behind the cloak of secrecy.

We know that Saddam Hussein pursued weapons of mass murder even when inspectors were in his country. Are we to assume that he stopped when they left? The history, the logic, and the facts lead to one conclusion: Saddam Hussein's regime is a grave and gathering danger. To suggest otherwise is to hope against the evidence. To assume this regime's good faith is to bet the lives of millions and the peace of the world in a reckless gamble. And this is a risk we must not take.

Delegates to the General Assembly, we have been more than patient. We've tried sanctions. We've tried the carrot of oil for food, and the stick of coalition military strikes. But Saddam Hussein has defied all these efforts and continues to develop weapons of mass destruction. The first time we may be completely certain he has a -- nuclear weapons is when, God forbids, he uses one. We owe it to all our citizens to do everything in our power to prevent that day from coming.

The conduct of the Iraqi regime is a threat to the authority of the United Nations, and a threat to peace. Iraq has answered a decade of U.N. demands with a decade of defiance. All the world now faces a test, and the United Nations a difficult and defining moment. Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced, or cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?

This is a list of eight reasons to invade Iraq. Only one of them concerns weapons of mass destruction and even it doesn't say he has them.

Also, if this sounds a bit like President Bush's speech to the United Nations on September 12th 2002, that's because it is his speech. (or at least the parts concerning Iraq)

Below is a list of recommended demands from the President to the Iraqi regime found in this speech. None of them seem unreasonable even today.

If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will immediately and unconditionally forswear, disclose, and remove or destroy all weapons of mass destruction, long-range missiles, and all related material.

If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will immediately end all support for terrorism and act to suppress it, as all states are required to do by U.N. Security Council resolutions.

If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will cease persecution of its civilian population, including Shi'a, Sunnis, Kurds, Turkomans, and others, again as required by Security Council resolutions.

If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will release or account for all Gulf War personnel whose fate is still unknown. It will return the remains of any who are deceased, return stolen property, accept liability for losses resulting from the invasion of Kuwait, and fully cooperate with international efforts to resolve these issues, as required by Security Council resolutions.

If the Iraqi regime wishes peace, it will immediately end all illicit trade outside the oil-for-food program. It will accept U.N. administration of funds from that program, to ensure that the money is used fairly and promptly for the benefit of the Iraqi people.

If all these steps are taken, it will signal a new openness and accountability in Iraq. And it could open the prospect of the United Nations helping to build a government that represents all Iraqis -- a government based on respect for human rights, economic liberty, and internationally supervised elections.

The United States has no quarrel with the Iraqi people; they've suffered too long in silent captivity. Liberty for the Iraqi people is a great moral cause, and a great strategic goal. The people of Iraq deserve it; the security of all nations requires it. Free societies do not intimidate through cruelty and conquest, and open societies do not threaten the world with mass murder. The United States supports political and economic liberty in a unified Iraq.

 

!

 

79 posted on 06/22/2006 7:25:13 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
One theory I heard that came from another freeper suggested that Bush is downplaying this because he doesn't want to alert the terrorist to the WMD existence because if they get hold of some and find that they are still viable, the terrorists can do great harm to our troops and country. Bush would rather take the political hit from the Dems than put our troops and nation at risk because that's the kind of outstanding President we have in the Whitehouse. I agree. This fits, and is the only plausible reason I can think of for not totally obliterating the Dems lies. After all, I heard that Bush fought to keep this information classified.
80 posted on 06/22/2006 7:25:24 AM PDT by DEM-SPOILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson