Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking? WMD report?

Posted on 06/21/2006 2:38:38 PM PDT by Scarchin

I just got a phonecall saying something big was about to break RE: WMD but I can't get to a TV. Anyone?


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: demnightmare; first; iraq; iraqiwmds; prewarintelligence; santorum; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501 next last
To: tobyhill

Nope, no stockpile ... it has to be 525 or more to be considered a stockpile ...

nothing to see here ... move on ...

</sarcasm>


41 posted on 06/21/2006 2:45:35 PM PDT by dartuser ("In 100 years the Bible will be forgotten and eliminated." - Voltaire (1694 - 1778))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

Proves saddam did NOT destroy them.


42 posted on 06/21/2006 2:45:59 PM PDT by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

Drudge is yesterday. FR is what is happening


43 posted on 06/21/2006 2:46:04 PM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Chena

Amen :)


44 posted on 06/21/2006 2:46:23 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Mrs. Klintoon, what did you know, and when did you know it?


45 posted on 06/21/2006 2:46:31 PM PDT by HeadOn (Life is hard. It's harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill
Karl Rove had them made, used laundered money from Tom Delay to do it, and had them stored in Iraq so they could be conveniently found.
46 posted on 06/21/2006 2:46:44 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
Ignored why? Bush claimed Iraq was not forthcoming in its claim they destroyed their chemical weapons. He didn't say the WMD that were there were date spefic as to manufacture time frame.

Why would it matter anyway when they were built?
47 posted on 06/21/2006 2:46:53 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

Last I heard one shell holds 9-12 lbs of raw chemicals. Enough to kill a few hundred thousand.


48 posted on 06/21/2006 2:46:57 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: america-rules

great news!


49 posted on 06/21/2006 2:47:16 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Ye ole "tell a big lie often enough."

Dims learned something from the national socialist party.


50 posted on 06/21/2006 2:47:39 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

"yeah, but it's ooooonnnnlllleeeeeeeeeee five hundred"


51 posted on 06/21/2006 2:47:51 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

25 short of a stockpile, just darn!


52 posted on 06/21/2006 2:47:58 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

yep...

Big time stuff....


53 posted on 06/21/2006 2:48:14 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - Foreman of the NAU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

Call Santorum's office!!!!


54 posted on 06/21/2006 2:48:17 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

They can't say "No WMDs" anymore!

Yippeeeee!


55 posted on 06/21/2006 2:48:31 PM PDT by sazerac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

Anyone monitoring Daily Kos for suicidal tendencies?


56 posted on 06/21/2006 2:48:38 PM PDT by Ben Mugged (If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank a soldier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV

Because the argument was that Saddam had a bunch of chemical shells prior to the first Gulf War that were buried and lost...no one knew where they were.

It's not my arguement.


57 posted on 06/21/2006 2:48:53 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Islamic Terrorists, the Mainstream Media and the Democrat Party Have the Same Goals in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: dartuser

250, no 501, no, 502, no 1000 shells is a stockpipe

And they have to be "new" shells.

And radioactive, not just WMD

and spiders, there has to be spiders.


59 posted on 06/21/2006 2:49:22 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sazerac

Now they will say "not enough WMDs" or "Bush didn't lie, but people died anyway"


60 posted on 06/21/2006 2:49:43 PM PDT by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson