Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indian troops being deployed in Myanmar
India Defence ^ | 17/5/2006

Posted on 06/21/2006 8:09:46 AM PDT by Gengis Khan

The Myanmarese news website 'Mizzima News' reported that Indian troops have moved into the Indo-Burmese border region of Moreh. India and Myanmar have had a very good military relationship with Myanmar helping India with tackling border insurgencies.

About 50 Indian military trucks believed to be carrying weapons crossed the border into Burma last Thursday, according to eyewitnesses.

"Five trucks full of soldiers followed the 50 trucks," a resident in Moreh said. The backs of the trucks were reportedly covered with plastic sheets. The Burmese embassy in India refused to comment on what the trucks were carrying.

Security was tightened in Moreh, an Indo-Burma border town, from April 24 to 26 in the lead up to a border-trade meeting in Dimapur, Nagaland on April 26.

Analysts suggest that this could be the precursor of Indian military operations against Anti-India insurgents who take refuge on the Burmese side of the border.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: burma; geopolitics; india; junta; seasia; southasia

1 posted on 06/21/2006 8:09:48 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

in the United States, technically the Southeast Asian eastern land neighbor to india is Burma. Myanmar was declared by the military junta that the United States doesn't recognize as being the legitimate government of Burma.


2 posted on 06/21/2006 8:19:51 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What's the common m.o. when encountering a troll?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

Expect a turnaround on this issue. The Chinese overlords of the Junta will not like this if this is true and the junta will do a volte-face on this. I have a bad feeling about working with such military regimes.

Having been educated in India, Aungsan SuuKyi is our best bet for this Country.


3 posted on 06/21/2006 8:23:29 AM PDT by MimirsWell (SCO: Slimy Commies and Organ harvesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MimirsWell

Agree. 100%.

We are supporting the wrong side.


4 posted on 06/21/2006 8:31:00 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; Cronos; CarrotAndStick; razoroccam; Arjun; samsonite; Bombay Bloke; mindfever; ...

Ping!


5 posted on 06/21/2006 8:36:48 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

I too felt that way ,the autocratic rule of the junta must end and democracy should be restored if that is what the people wants.The plight of suu kyi is very sad and a concrete action must be taken soon to free her.


6 posted on 06/21/2006 9:18:12 AM PDT by voice of india (Lord is my light and my salvation whom shall i fear ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: voice of india

The "peoples" voice, such as in Nepal? Maoism is not the answer to autocracy. I hope that some day Burma has a proper government... but democracies are unpredictable!

Whats sauce for the goose is not always so for the gander!


7 posted on 06/21/2006 6:05:27 PM PDT by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ketelone

News flash: Suu Kyi is not a Maoist.


8 posted on 06/21/2006 6:10:33 PM PDT by denydenydeny ("Osama... made the mistake of confusing media conventional wisdom with reality" (Mark Steyn))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ketelone

& what exactly is predictable???A mass murdering or suave wacko (both are much the same).Bangladesh,while increasingly a quagmire has been a far managable proposition for India & the rest of the world than Paki-land.


9 posted on 06/21/2006 7:06:26 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ketelone

One can't selectively promote Democracy where one fancies that the people are on one's side. I believe that if the actions of India or the USA hurt the interests of the majority of the people in a particular country, then they have every right to be angry with the perpetrator.

This is the reason we need democracies, not just to ensure that the democratic country's majority prosper, but also to ensure that we periodically check our behaviour and correct ourselves.

We may however pursue our nation's self interest at the end overriding concerns of such countries as is the case in Palestine. If a majority of the people want terrorists for leaders, then the rest of the world can shun them.


10 posted on 06/22/2006 1:04:13 AM PDT by MimirsWell (SCO: Slimy Commies and Organ harvesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

yes, it is the wrong side, but at times you have to make a deal with the devil. Let's face facts -- India was against the junta for a long time and there was (and is) no sign that the military junta regime is even weakening. also -- the junta was cosying up to China. Instead of letting the Chinese set up ports in Burma, India decides to dance with the devil. Not nice, but necessary.


11 posted on 06/23/2006 11:42:58 AM PDT by Cronos (Remember 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia! Sola Scriptura leads to solo scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson