Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Father Can't Raise Child Despite Mother's Deception
ClickonDetroit ^ | June 21, 2006 | AP

Posted on 06/21/2006 6:55:07 AM PDT by ShadowDancer

Court: Father Can't Raise Child Despite Mother's Deception

Woman Lied, Saying Baby Died

POSTED: 7:06 am EDT June 21, 2006

RALEIGH, N.C. -- A biological father should lose his parental rights because he did not establish himself as a caregiver, even though the mother deceived the man by claiming she had a miscarriage, the state Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.

Pernell Ingram argued that he had provided sufficient care to the mother to qualify as the legal father of a child born out of wedlock. The Newton Grove man said he had provided "consistent care" by frequently caring for the mother's other two children while she was pregnant and joining his former girlfriend at prenatal medical appointments. While he did not provide financial support, Ingram pursued a new job and bought a larger car to prepare for a child.

Ingram also testified that he and the mother planned to marry and even discussed names for their prospective child. But after deciding against marriage, the two separated, although Ingram kept contact and insisted he would like to care for the baby.

Later, the mother informed Ingram that the child had died. Suspicious, Ingram sought confirmation, but was unable to find official word until an adoption agency served him with a petition to end his parental rights.

But while the judges were "sympathetic" to Ingram, Chief Judge John Martin wrote that there were no findings of fact that would indicate the father had "assumed some of the burdens of parenthood." Judge Eric Levinson agreed.

The judges ruled that under state law Ingram had to gain paternal rights by either marrying the mother, providing substantial financial support or consistent care to the mother and child, or immediately filing a petition to the courts or to the Department of Health and Human Services.

Judge Barbara Jackson wrote a dissenting opinion, reasoning that Ingram could not have pursued his status as a father with the woman's lies.

"To argue, as the majority does, that (Ingram) should have filed an affidavit to legitimate an illusory child seems beyond the bounds of what we reasonably may expect of any man," Jackson wrote. "It is undisputed that (Ingram) made drastic changes in his life upon learning of the pregnancy."

The appeals court ruling reverses the 2004 decision of Wake County District Court Judge Michael Morgan, which sided with Ingram.

Attorneys from both sides did not return phone calls seeking comment Tuesday.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: adoption; childabduction; cps; deception; dss; fathersrights; incentive; incentiveprograms; mensrights; nc; program; raleigh; services; social
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: JamesP81
Question: does this guy also qualify as a deadbeat in your opinion?

No, but the mother is a lying slut.

21 posted on 06/21/2006 8:51:40 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

Yes, that's true. Perhaps she nixed the idea? The article isn't clear on why they didn't get married.


22 posted on 06/21/2006 9:18:37 AM PDT by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: caver
He got screwed.

I agree.

23 posted on 06/21/2006 2:18:57 PM PDT by ShadowDancer (No autopsy, no foul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
There is a difference between failing and being a failure. If he did everything and failed, he can hold his head up because he and God know the truth and someday so will the child. If, on the other hand, he didn't give the last full measure for the benefit of your child, if he at any time put his own comfort, happiness and well being ahead of that you the child, if he left anything on the table, he is a failure and won't get any sympathy from me.
24 posted on 06/21/2006 6:02:07 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

That's well said.


25 posted on 06/22/2006 4:33:09 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
Judge Barbara Jackson wrote a dissenting opinion,

Good; that means it goes to the Supreme Court automatically.

The opinion is here.

26 posted on 06/22/2006 12:22:03 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson