Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: linda_22003
Just showing you how silly your statement looked. ;)

Very kind of you dear. What you don't realize is the background.

When investigating the mysterious death of a priest who was involved with exposing homosexual sex abuse in the Albany Catholic diocese a couple years ago, it came to my attention that many of the reporters spinning the story in favor of the extremely gay-friendly Bishop Hubbard--who was himself accused of sex abuse with boys--were *deeply* involved in the "gay" community themselves. It would be like having secret members of The Christian Coalition writing puff stories about Pat Robertson during one of his many mini-scandals.

Get it now?
97 posted on 06/21/2006 12:42:07 PM PDT by Antoninus (I don't vote for liberals -- regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: Antoninus

I can understand that, yes. A reporter's background can matter when it comes to the reporting of a story, and I concede the point in your example.

What I "get", mostly, is the urge for a very hot shower with a great deal of soap and a scrub brush, when you call me "dear" (shuddering).


98 posted on 06/21/2006 12:53:50 PM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson