Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greely missile site may be locked on North Korea
Fairbanks Daily News-Miner ^ | Tuesday, June 20, 2006 | Sam Bishop

Posted on 06/20/2006 4:53:29 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon

WASHINGTON — Those in charge of the nation’s missile defense system have often said the interceptors based at Fort Greely could be used in a pinch. Today, amid reports that North Korea is about to launch a missile capable of reaching the United States, officials wouldn’t say whether that pinch has arrived.

“There are many options available, and we are simply not going to tip our hand as to what the possible response would be,” White House spokesman Tony Snow told reporters on a flight to Vienna with President Bush earlier today. Snow’s comments were made to pool reporters traveling with the president and made available by the White House.

North Korea is reportedly in the process of fueling one of its Taepodong-2 missiles, which experts say have a range that put Alaska and the western U.S. within their reach.

Military spokesmen also declined to speculate about media reports quoting unnamed officials who say the missile defense system has been placed in “operational” status in response to North Korea’s threatened missile launch.

“The Department of Defense does not comment on the operational status of any weapons system,” said Pentagon spokesman Brian Maka.

Missile Defense Agency spokesman Rick Lehner said his agency is in charge of developing the system, not operating it, so he had no comment on whether it is now operational. Not that he could say anything anyway, he added.

“Anytime it’s ever been brought to operational status, it’s been classified,” he said.

If the interceptors are in an “operational” mode, as opposed to a “test” mode, it would mean several things, according to those who have studied and debated the system from outside the government.

Sensor systems such as radars and satellites will “essentially focus on the fairly well-known launch point of this missile,” said Baker Spring, a defense expert at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C.

Also, he said, “it means having the interceptor missiles in a position where they can be launched in accordance with what the sensors are telling them would be some kind of substantial threat to the United States.”

John Isaacs, executive director of the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, said the most noticeable difference would be that military personnel would start covering essential posts around the clock.

When the system is not in operational status, “they don’t have soldiers staffing it at all times, especially at the interceptor sites in Alaska and California,” Isaacs said.

Leslie Ozawa, public affairs officer at Fort Greely, said today that “we’re not doing anything different.” He said he could not discuss the status of the interceptors, nine of which, at last report, rest in silos at the post 100 miles southeast of Fairbanks. Two more interceptors are located at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: afraid; alaska; avianflee; fortgreely; greely; hysterical; kimilchicken; kimilscared; missile; missiledefense; northkorea; panic; proliferation; scared
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: familyop
Our military won't miss.

They can. What counts is how many missiles get through. Some will, some won't. That is what should prevent an enemy from even trying: he won't know which missiles will get through, so his military plans will be useless and what comes back will make his military plans irrelevant anyway. A further complication is that the missile defense would have to be neutralized before the main attack and that will provide enough time to make the necessary response and put an end to the threat. There will be some successful strikes; that is impossible to stop completely.

21 posted on 06/20/2006 5:10:15 PM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I wasn't aware that NK is prepared to launch more than one.


22 posted on 06/20/2006 5:13:11 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon; RightWhale; traumer; abb

I've got a dumb question.

If this is just a test launch -- why shoot it down?

If we are going to shoot it down -- is it really aimed at us?


23 posted on 06/20/2006 5:14:25 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

If they wish to jump the shark they need launch only one. They have several if they wish to go for it, and they have 30,000 artillery tubes a day's drive from Seoul.


24 posted on 06/20/2006 5:18:00 PM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

There is something else going on related to the conditions of ceasefire obtained in the early fifties. Nobody is worried about the missile itself but the fact of its launch in violation of the ceasefire.


25 posted on 06/20/2006 5:20:07 PM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
When it is launched, it goes over Japan. (They have done this at least twice before.)

Japan really doesn't like to have errant missiles with (who knows what) payload going over or crashing into their country.

Nor do the U.S. Forces appreciate a missile flying at them or over them. (Case in point, Misawa AB. 1998)
26 posted on 06/20/2006 5:20:20 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
If we are going to shoot it down -- is it really aimed at us?

When civilized countries are going to test they notify the world as to trajectory and target. NK is not telling anyone anything. We are well within our rights to practice due diligence.

27 posted on 06/20/2006 5:20:33 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Make them go home!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
LOL Good one!

Splash one incoming kimchee crockpot duct-taped onto the nose of a Hooflungdong II.

28 posted on 06/20/2006 5:22:48 PM PDT by Dumpster Baby ("Hope somebody finds me before the rats do .....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette; RightWhale; Jet Jaguar

Those answers help. Thanks!


29 posted on 06/20/2006 5:22:51 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I think you are talking about more of a Russian / Chinese
scenario. Korea just can't launch multiple missiles, I have no worries about Mr. Ruh Roh.
30 posted on 06/20/2006 5:24:16 PM PDT by DAC22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DAC22

N Kor can launch multiple missiles against S Kor and Japan. The N Kor ICBM capability is limited to some kind of automatic suicide-by-cop system.


31 posted on 06/20/2006 5:26:55 PM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: abb
I would like to think we have several cruise missles locked on to the launch site prepared to take the thing out BEFORE it lauches. A ounce of prevention and all that...

Remember the post from a day or so ago, showing the 3 aircraft carriers?

A poster asked, "Aren't they suppossed to have submarines with the fleet? Where are the submarines?"

Now you know! :)

32 posted on 06/20/2006 5:29:41 PM PDT by LasVegasMac (Islam........not fit for human consumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Mrs. Submareener says:"We should be very diplomatic and meet them half way! .... Somewhere over the Pacific!"


33 posted on 06/20/2006 5:33:00 PM PDT by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
Thanks for posting the link to the NK photos.

IS it just me? All the statues seem to be wearing Western clothes......
34 posted on 06/20/2006 5:36:33 PM PDT by ASOC (Choose between the lesser of two evils and in the end, you still have, well, evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
I don't think we want to say too much in advance of this, as a lot of our stuff is still experimental, and might not necessarily work. However, wouldn't it be great if this thing was lased into smoking lumps of metal, ten feet off the launch pad? We wouldn't confirm or deny anything, of course.

-ccm

35 posted on 06/20/2006 5:40:32 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

N.Korea will either implode or explode within the next 10 years unless they are bailed out by S.Korea or China. The hope is they will implode rather than strike out at the US or its allies.


36 posted on 06/20/2006 5:44:03 PM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
100-story hotel in Pyongyang that could not be finished because the construction was so horribly shoddy...

Perhaps we can help with its demolition.

37 posted on 06/20/2006 5:47:34 PM PDT by Salvey (ancest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
100-story hotel in Pyongyang that could not be finished because the construction was so horribly shoddy...

Perhaps we can help with its demolition.

38 posted on 06/20/2006 5:47:35 PM PDT by Salvey (ancest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LasVegasMac

nope....he dont know.....very few do......they were prolly already there laying on the ocean floor in silence....


39 posted on 06/20/2006 5:47:56 PM PDT by halfright (--------------------------------------------Bolton/Coulter 08'--------------------------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

A moment of thanks for the great Ronaldo Maximus and his refusal to submit that all we could do in the face of a rogue launch was "ride it out." President Reagan, I miss you so much.


40 posted on 06/20/2006 5:53:14 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("So to hell with that twerp at the [WaPo]. I've got no time for him on a day like this." Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson