[ccmay]

I don't think we want to say too much in advance of this, as a lot of our stuff is still experimental, and might not necessarily work. However, wouldn't it be great if this thing was lased into smoking lumps of metal, ten feet off the launch pad? We wouldn't confirm or deny anything, of course.

-ccm

[Nickey]

"However, wouldn't it be great if this thing was lased into smoking lumps of metal, ten feet off the launch pad? We wouldn't confirm or deny anything, of course."

500 kt groundburst at launch site, with a lighter followup after the rubble lands at assembly site - with some EMR bombs to destroy the milcom connection with Pyongyang, and we might be able to show the world that tac nuclear weapons aren't just for show.

Nonnuclear is reasonable to just target launch site, but problem is with disrupting counterattack. Few small NW's with strategic placement and DPNK collapses.

[KoRn]

"However, wouldn't it be great if this thing was lased into smoking lumps of metal, ten feet off the launch pad?"

We could do that with a single conventional cruise missile right now before it even launches.