To: Momaw Nadon
I don't think we want to say too much in advance of this, as a lot of our stuff is still experimental, and might not necessarily work. However, wouldn't it be great if this thing was lased into smoking lumps of metal, ten feet off the launch pad? We wouldn't confirm or deny anything, of course.
-ccm
35 posted on
06/20/2006 5:40:32 PM PDT by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order)
To: ccmay
"However, wouldn't it be great if this thing was lased into smoking lumps of metal, ten feet off the launch pad? We wouldn't confirm or deny anything, of course."
500 kt groundburst at launch site, with a lighter followup after the rubble lands at assembly site - with some EMR bombs to destroy the milcom connection with Pyongyang, and we might be able to show the world that tac nuclear weapons aren't just for show.
Nonnuclear is reasonable to just target launch site, but problem is with disrupting counterattack. Few small NW's with strategic placement and DPNK collapses.
78 posted on
06/20/2006 8:53:13 PM PDT by
Nickey
(Loose Lips Sink Ships.)
To: ccmay
"However, wouldn't it be great if this thing was lased into smoking lumps of metal, ten feet off the launch pad?" We could do that with a single conventional cruise missile right now before it even launches.
89 posted on
06/20/2006 9:58:40 PM PDT by
KoRn
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson